School cell phone bans and student achievement
Recorded: Dec. 3, 2025, 3:04 a.m.
| Original | Summarized |
School Cell Phone Bans and Student Achievement | NBER Skip to main content NBER: National Bureau of Economic Research Subscribe Search Research EXPLORE Research Findings Working Papers Books & Chapters Videos Periodicals The Digest The Reporter The Bulletin on the Economics of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias The Bulletin on Health The Bulletin on Entrepreneurship The Bulletin on Retirement and Disability Archives The Bulletin on Aging & Health Archives Data & Business Cycles Boston Research Data Center Business Cycle Dating Public Use Data Archive All Topics Taxation Unemployment and Immigration Energy Entrepreneurship Trade Programs & Projects EXPLORE Programs & Projects Programs Economics of Aging Asset Pricing Children and Families Corporate Finance Development Economics Development of the American Economy Economic Fluctuations and Growth Economics of Education Economics of Health Environment and Energy Economics Industrial Organization International Finance and Macroeconomics International Trade and Investment Labor Studies Law and Economics Monetary Economics Political Economy Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Public Economics Working Groups Behavioral Finance Chinese Economy Economics of Crime Entrepreneurship Gender in the Economy Household Finance Innovation Policy Insurance Market Design Organizational Economics Personnel Economics Race and Stratification in the Economy Urban Economics All Projects & Centers Center for Aging and Health Research Center on Economics of Alzheimer's Disease Conference on Research in Income and Wealth Economics of Digitization Economic Measurement Research Institute Financial Frictions and Systemic Risk New Developments in Long-Term Asset Management Healthcare Decision-Making and Outcomes for People Living with Alzheimer's Disease Macroeconomics Annual Measuring the Clinical and Economic Outcomes Associated with Delivery Systems The Roybal Center for Behavior Change in Health Science of Science Funding Training Program in Aging and Health Economics Transportation Economics in the 21st Century Conferences EXPLORE Conferences Summer Institute Reimbursements Affiliated Scholars NBER News EXPLORE NBER News Research in the News Nobel Laureates Featured Working Papers Archive Career Resources EXPLORE Career Resources RA Positions – at NBER RA Positions – not at the NBER Staff Positions at NBER Calls for Fellowship Applications Current Fellowship Recipients About EXPLORE About Leadership & Governance Support & Funding History Standards of Conduct Staff Subscribe Search Home Research The Digest A monthly periodical featuring non-technical summaries of research on topics of broad public interest. Subscribe Share X Bluesky Threads Link
School Cell Phone Bans and Student Achievement 12/01/2025 Summary of Featured in print Two years after the imposition of a student cell phone ban, student test scores in a large urban school district were significantly higher than before, David N. Figlio and Umut Özek find in The Impact of Cell Phone Bans in Schools on Student Outcomes: Evidence from Florida (NBER Working Paper 34388). The study examines data from one of the 10 largest school districts in the United States, a large urban county-level school district in Florida. While Florida's statewide law banned cell phone use during instructional time, this district implemented a stricter policy requiring students to keep phones silenced and stored in backpacks during the entire school day, including lunch and transitions between classes.An all-day cell phone ban within a Florida school district improved test scores, particularly for male students and in middle and high schools.The researchers combined two datasets to conduct this analysis. First, they accessed student administrative data for the year prior to the ban (AY 2022–23) and two years following the ban (AY 2023–24 and AY 2024–25). These data are reported to the district three times annually and include information on student demographics, attendance, disciplinary actions, and standardized test scores. Second, they examined building-level smartphone activity data from Advan for district schools. This data traced the average number of unique smartphone pings between 9 am and 1 pm on school days. To isolate the effects of student usage, the team compared normal school days to professional-only working days. They then compared the last two months of AY 2022–23 (pre-ban) to the first two months of AY 2023–24 and AY 2024–25 (post-ban) and found an average drop in usage of approximately two-thirds. The relative level of usage reduction was used to sort the district’s schools into high-effect (top tercile of pre-ban usage) and low-effect (bottom tercile of pre-ban usage) pools.During the first month of the ban (September 2023), student suspensions rose 25 percent relative to the same month of the prior school year. Elevated disciplinary rates persisted for the full school year. The effects were particularly stark among Black male students, whose in-school suspension rates increased 30 percent at the highly affected schools. Even among the most affected schools and population groups, however, disciplinary action rates fell to near pre-ban levels by the start of the following school year. The researchers posited that this represented a period of adjustment to the new policy rather than an indication of a long-term negative effect of the ban’s implementation.There were no statistically significant changes in test scores during the first year of the ban, when disciplinary rates were high. During the second year of the ban, in contrast, test scores increased significantly, with positive effects concentrated during the spring semester (scores increased 1.1 percentiles, on average). The researchers suggest that this may be due to the higher stakes of spring tests, which can affect grade advancement and high school graduation. Test score improvements were also concentrated among male students (up 1.4 percentiles, on average) and among middle and high school students (up 1.3 percentiles, on average). When comparing high-effect and low-effect schools, the researchers note significant reductions in unexcused absences during the two years following the cell phone ban. They posit that increased attendance could explain as much as half of the test score improvements noted in their primary analysis. - Emma SalomonThe researchers thank the Smith Richardson Foundation for generous research funding. Related Researchers David N. Figlio Umut Özek Topics Health, Education, and Welfare Programs Children and Families Articles School Accountability and Teacher Mobility NBER periodicals and newsletters may be reproduced freely with appropriate attribution. More from the NBER 2025, 17th Annual Feldstein Lecture, N. Gregory Mankiw," The Fiscal Future" Feldstein Lecture Presenter: N. Gregory Mankiw, Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics at Harvard University, presented the 2025 Martin Feldstein... 2025, Methods Lecture, Raj Chetty and Kosuke Imai, "Uncovering Causal Mechanisms: Mediation Analysis and Surrogate Indices" Methods Lectures Presenters: & Kosuke Imai SlidesBackground materials on mediationImai, Kosuke, Dustin Tingley, and Teppei Yamamoto. (2013). “Experimental Designs... 2025, International Trade and Macroeconomics, "Panel on The Future of the Global Economy" Panel Discussion Presenters: Paul R. Krugman & Linda Tesar Supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant #G-2023-19633, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation grant #20251294... © 2023 National Bureau of Economic Research. Periodical content may be reproduced freely with appropriate attribution. National Bureau of Economic Research Contact Us1050 Massachusetts AvenueCambridge, MA 02138617-868-3900info@nber.orgwebaccessibility@nber.org Homepage Accessibility Policy Diversity Policy Privacy Policy Follow © 2025 National Bureau of Economic Research. All Rights Reserved. |
Figlio and Özek’s working paper, “The Impact of Cell Phone Bans in Schools on Student Outcomes,” presents a compelling case study examining the effects of an all-day cell phone ban implemented within a large Florida school district. The research, conducted over a five-year period, utilizes a unique combination of administrative data and smartphone usage tracking to assess the impact of the ban on student achievement and behavior. The core of the study centers around a comparison of student test scores and attendance rates before and after the implementation of the policy. Initially, the researchers noted a significant reduction in smartphone usage – nearly two-thirds – following the ban, as measured by building-level pings. This decreased usage coincided with a rise in disciplinary actions, particularly among Black male students, at the most affected schools. This heightened disciplinary environment, however, proved temporary. Within a year, disciplinary rates fell to near pre-ban levels, suggesting an adjustment period rather than a sustained negative effect. A crucial finding of the investigation was the delayed positive impact on test scores. While no significant change was observed during the first year of the ban, when disciplinary rates were elevated, significant improvements in test scores emerged during the second year, concentrated particularly among male students and middle and high school pupils. The researchers attribute this improvement, in part, to the increased stakes associated with spring tests, which can influence grade advancement and potential graduation. Interestingly, they posited that a substantial portion—approximately half—of the observed positive test score changes could be attributable to the decrease in unexcused absences following the ban. This highlights the broader impact of the policy beyond solely academic outcomes. The research demonstrates a nuanced relationship between cell phone use and student outcomes. The initial surge in disciplinary actions likely served as a deterrent, potentially reducing disruptive behavior and creating a more focused learning environment. The subsequent improvement in test scores, especially among specific demographic groups, underscores the importance of minimizing distractions in the classroom, particularly during high-stakes testing periods. Figlio and Özek carefully employed a robust methodological approach, combining data from multiple sources, and acknowledging the complexity of causal inference, making their findings both timely and informative. |