A Jury Orders EDO To Pay $18.3 Million To iSpot Over Data Misuse | AdExchanger

image/svg+xml:

Topics
Latest
Marketers
Agencies
Publishers
Technology
Platforms
Identity
Measurement
Data Privacy
Artificial Intelligence
CTV
Commerce
AdExplainer
Exclusive Report
Daily News Roundup

Opinion
All Columns
Data-Driven Thinking
On TV & Video
The Sell Sider
Content Studio
Comic
Contributor Guidelines

About Us
Advertise
Newsletter
AdExchanger Advisory Board
About Us
Contact Us

Events
Programmatic AI Las Vegas
AdExchanger Awards
Webinars
All Events
Network Events

Podcasts
AdExchanger Talks
The Big Story
Inside the Stack

NEW! Programmatic AI 2026

Become an AdHero

Subscribe

Sign In

Sign In

Topics
Latest
Marketers
Agencies
Publishers
Technology
Platforms
Identity
Measurement
Data Privacy
Artificial Intelligence
CTV
Commerce
AdExplainer
Exclusive Report
Daily News Roundup

Opinion
All Columns
Data-Driven Thinking
On TV & Video
The Sell Sider
Content Studio
Comic
Contributor Guidelines

Events & Awards
Programmatic AI Las Vegas
AdExchanger Awards
Webinars
All Events
Network Events

Podcasts
AdExchanger Talks
The Big Story
Inside the Stack

Subscribe Free
Sign Up

About Us
Advertise
Newsletter
AdExchanger Advisory Board
About Us
Contact Us

CONNECT

Home Measurement A Jury Orders EDO To Pay $18.3 Million To iSpot Over Data Misuse

Measurement
A Jury Orders EDO To Pay $18.3 Million To iSpot Over Data Misuse By Alyssa Boyle

Tuesday, January 20th, 2026 – 10:00 am
SHARE:

Video ad measurement rivalry is so fierce, it’s spilling from the boardroom to the courtroom.
Last week, a jury in California awarded $18.3 million to video measurement firm iSpot to resolve its lawsuit against EDO, a measurement company co-founded by actor Ed Norton.
The suit, first filed in 2022, alleges that EDO breached its contract with iSpot by misusing the latter’s TV ad data to build a competing product.
ISpot had sought $47 million in damages based on its calculations of the harm EDO allegedly caused through its actions. Although the jury awarded iSpot less than half of that number, it agreed that EDO had violated multiple contract provisions, including exceeding data access limits beyond contractual terms and using that data to develop rival tech.

“Measurement is the business of trust, transparency and accountability, and EDO proved they have zero regard for any of that through a pattern of data theft, obfuscation, evidence deletion and lying,” iSpot said in a statement shared with AdExchanger.
EDO plans to appeal the decision, dismissing iSpot’s accusation as a “desperate attempt to slow down a smaller, smarter competitor,” according to EDO’s statement.
However, an internal email viewed by AdExchanger suggests EDO did intend to use iSpot’s data to build a competing product. In a September 2017 message, sent by EDO CEO Kevin Krim to Norton, he mentions the company’s intention to “transition away from iSpot and steal their business.”
A behind-the-scenes peek
According to the complaint, EDO, which was founded in 2015, allegedly began misusing iSpot’s data shortly after becoming a client in 2014, back when EDO still went by the name “Big Data Box Office.” (It later changed its name to EDO, which stands for “Entertainment Data Oracle.”)
At the time, the Norton-backed company was looking to build a business helping studios predict box office sales.
ISpot’s client contracts explicitly prohibit the use of its data to “build any services that compete with iSpot or give the impression that they compete.” But, in 2016, Sony alerted iSpot that EDO had pitched it a product that appeared very similar to iSpot’s. Krim has denied this.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily
Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Daily Roundup

Daily News Roundup
OpenAI Opens The Box; And BBC Opens Up To YouTube Ads

While iSpot threatened to remove EDO’s access to its data after Sony’s tip, the two companies maintained a contractual relationship until 2018.
In 2017, EDO gained expanded access to iSpot’s dashboard through a mutual client for whom EDO was conducting a project. Although EDO’s contract was restricted to the movie category, it was able to access viewing data across all verticals through this mutual client, which iSpot identified as Disney.
EDO did not renew its iSpot contract when it lapsed in early 2018.
But a 2017 internal email between EDO executives with the subject line “iSpot API” indicates that the company was considering a plan to maintain access covertly. The email, which was also viewed by AdExchanger, read: “We should access this API through some proxy to hide who we are.”
After EDO’s contractual relationship with iSpot ended in 2018, its access to iSpot’s data continued when it hired Nadya Teyfukova from Horizon Media, who had access to iSpot’s dashboard via her prior employer. According to court filings, Ed Rugoff, then EDO’s EVP of studio analytics and Teyfukova’s supervisor, directed her to download iSpot’s data upon discovery that her credentials still worked.
ISpot sued Teyfukova in 2021 after discovering she downloaded hundreds of reports over the course of 18 months. At that point, Rugoff directed her to delete any files with iSpot data from her EDO laptop, which she did.
In 2022, iSpot amended its suit against Teyfukova to also include EDO as a defendant.
What now?
As EDO prepares its appeal, the verdict underscores how difficult – and cutthroat – the advertising measurement business has become.
Although EDO never competed in the measurement currency space, a key distinction from iSpot, it has carved out a niche with outcomes-based measurement. ISpot, the elder of the two companies – it was founded in 2012, three years before EDO – has a long-standing reputation for providing cross-screen attribution, as highlighted by NBCU’s marketer-backed currency vendor comparison in 2022.
Video ad measurement has long been one of the TV industry’s top pain points. The need for standardization leaves little room for innovative differentiation. (There are only so many ways to count a video ad.)
Still, “measurement is supposed to be about providing truth, transparency, accountability and trust for the marketplace,” according to the media advisory iSpot released on Friday regarding the ruling.
But it may be hard for media buyers and sellers to maintain their confidence in measurement providers when those same providers apparently can’t seem to stay out of court.

Next In Measurement

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

Must Read

Publishers
Gamera Raises $1.6 Million To Protect The Open Web’s Media Quality

Gamera, a media quality measurement startup for publishers, announced on Tuesday it raised $1.6 million to promote its service that combines data about a site’s ad experience with data about how its ads perform.

AI
CES 2026: What’s Real – And What’s BS – When It Comes To AI

Ad industry experts call out trends to watch in 2026 and separate the real AI use cases having an impact today from the AI hype they heard at CES.

Commerce
New Startup Pinch AI Tackles The Growing Problem Of Ecommerce Return Scams

Fraud is eating into retail profits. A new startup called Pinch AI just launched with $5 million in funding to fight back.

Commerce
CPG Data Seller SPINS Moves Into Media With MikMak Acquisition

On Wednesday, retail and CPG data company SPINS added a new piece with its acquisition of MikMak, a click-to-buy ad tech and analytics startup that helps optimize their commerce media.

Marketers
How Valvoline Shifted Marketing Gears When It Became A Pure-Play Retail Brand

Believe it or not, car oil change service company Valvoline is in the midst of a fascinating retail marketing transformation.

PODCAST: The Big Story
The Big Story: Live From CES 2026

Agents, streamers and robots, oh my! Live from the C-Space campus at the Aria Casino in Las Vegas, our team breaks down the most interesting ad tech trends we saw at CES this year.

Popular

AI
CES 2026: What’s Real – And What’s BS – When It Comes To AI

Ad industry experts call out trends to watch in 2026 and separate the real AI use cases having an impact today from the AI hype they heard at CES.

Commerce
Getting Lost In The Protocols At NRF’s Big Show 2026

Retail’s Big Show, the annual NRF event in New York City, was big on agentic commerce, unsurprisingly, as well as influencer and creator marketing, which was an eye-opener.

CTV Roundup
CTV Is Stuck In Its Growing Pains. Can AI Save the Day?

Returning to the news desk after a year away from CTV beat reporting is like discovering a time capsule with the industry’s core dilemmas. One thing that has changed, however, is the CTV industry’s infatuation with agentic AI.

Marketers
Linkby Raises $15 Million For its Hybrid PR And Affiliate Marketing Network

Linkby, which connects brands with publisher content that advertisers pay for based on reader engagement, announced its $15 million Series B on Tuesday.

Publishers
Partnerize Wants To Reimagine Affiliate Attribution – And It Doesn’t Involve Clicks

Traffic is down, but publisher content is still driving purchases. Partnerize’s new attribution model lets publishers see what’s working and strike fair compensation deals.

Join the AdExchanger Community
Join Now

Your trusted source for in-depth programmatic news, views, education and events.
AdExchanger is where marketers, agencies, publishers and tech companies go for the latest information on the trends that are transforming digital media and marketing, from data, privacy, identity and AI to commerce, CTV, measurement and mobile.

NEXT EVENT
Convergent TV World
March 5-6, 2026The Times CenterNew York, NY
Learn More

ABOUT ADEXCHANGER
About Us
Advertise
Contact Us
Events
Subscribe
RSS
Cookie Settings
Privacy & Terms
Accessibility
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging

CONNECT

© 2026 Access Intelligence, LLC - All Rights Reserved

A jury has ordered EDO to pay iSpot $18.3 million, highlighting a contentious legal battle over data misuse and competitive practices within the video measurement industry. The lawsuit, initiated by iSpot in 2022, stemmed from allegations that EDO, co-founded by actor Ed Norton, breached its contract by leveraging iSpot’s data to develop competing measurement technology.

The jury's verdict, while less than the $47 million initially sought by iSpot, affirmed multiple contract violations, including exceeding data access limits and using the information to build a rival product. iSpot’s statement underscored a critical stance – that trust, transparency, and accountability are paramount in the measurement business, a claim undermined by EDO's alleged actions.

The case offers an inside look at the competitive fervor surrounding video ad measurement. Founded in 2015, EDO initially targeted predicting box office sales, but drew accusations of using iSpot data, established in 2012, to gain a competitive advantage. Internal communications, including a September 2017 email from EDO CEO Kevin Krim to Norton, explicitly detailed the company's intention to "transition away from iSpot and steal their business."

Key events leading to the lawsuit unfolded over several years. EDO gained expanded access through a client project with Disney in 2017, despite contractual restrictions. Subsequent attempts to maintain covert access, as evidenced by the “iSpot API” email, further fueled iSpot’s concerns.

Notably, EDO employee Nadya Teyfukova, under the supervision of EVP of studio analytics Ed Rugoff, downloaded hundreds of iSpot reports from her EDO laptop before deleting them upon discovery. This series of events culminated in a 2022 amendment of iSpot’s lawsuit to include EDO as a defendant.

The verdict reflects the intense and sometimes cutthroat nature of the measurement industry. As iSpot argued, this case underscores the importance of establishing trust and accountability within a field where data is the core currency. However, the dispute also reveals a greater challenge for media buyers and sellers – maintaining confidence in measurement providers when instances of alleged misuse occur.