China’s Renewable Energy Revolution Is a Huge Mess That Might Save the World | WIREDSkip to main contentMenuSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuAccountAccountNewslettersSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoMerchSearchSearchSign InSign InJeremy Wallace The Big StoryJan 20, 2026 6:00 AMChina’s Renewable Energy Revolution Is a Huge Mess That Might Save the WorldA global onslaught of cheap Chinese green power is upending everything in its path. No one is ready for its repercussions.ILLUSTRATION: PINGNAN LUCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyThere’s a particular kind of sci-fi nerd who equates fusion tech with utopia. If we could only harness the engine of the stars, it would uncork near limitless energy and neatly sweep away a whole mess of humanity’s problems. But how would that work exactly? What would the transition look like?You don’t have to wonder. It’s happening now. Solar panels and wind turbines capture the fusion of the sun and convert it to electricity. And at the scale and pace that China is producing them, plenty of things stand to be swept away—including, quite possibly, the once seemingly intractable problems of energy poverty and fossil-fuel dependence. In 2024, the total installed electricity capacity of the planet—every coal, gas, hydro, and nuclear plant and all of the renewables—was about 10 terawatts. The Chinese solar supply chain can now pump out 1 terawatt of panels every year.In China itself, vast energy megabases combining solar and wind stretch for miles in the country’s western deserts and Tibetan highlands, each producing the power of multiple nuclear plants and connecting to population centers in the country’s east via ultrahigh-voltage power lines. At the smaller end of the scale, panels have sprouted on rooftops all over the more populated eastern half of the country, thanks to policies that standardize the process and paperwork required to install and tie them into the grid. Huge factories, urban apartment buildings, and humble village homes are plastered with panels. In Europe, Chinese-made photovoltaic panels are so cheap that they cost less than fencing materials. Globally, the glut of solar has lowered the average cost of generating electricity to 4 cents a kilowatt hour—perhaps the cheapest form of energy ever.By now, major headlines have begun to catch on to the reality that China’s renewable energy revolution is one of the biggest stories in the world, while Donald Trump’s anti-renewable vision of American energy dominance is a backward sideshow by comparison. But chroniclers of this green tech revolution almost always understate its chaos. At this point, it is far less a tightly managed, top-down creation of state subsidies than a runaway train of competition. The resulting, onrushing utopia is anything but neat. It is a panorama of coal communities decimated, price wars sweeping across one market after another, and electrical grids destabilizing as they become more central to the energy system. And absolutely no one—least of all some monolithic “China” at the control switch—knows how to deal with its repercussions.In the United States, 2024 was a record-breaking year for solar. Across the entire country, those 12 months saw some 50 gigawatts of new solar capacity added. (Solar projects are typically measured by their power output, not their square footage.)The China IssuePHOTOGRAPH: ANDRIA LOHere are 23 ways China is rewiring the future.Now consider some different numbers, for scale and contrast. In China, the first three months of 2025 alone saw 60 gigawatts of new solar capacity added to the national grid. Then April packed in 45 more gigawatts. Finally, May added an eye-watering 92 gigawatts of new capacity, or 3 gigawatts every day.The reason for this brain-warping mad dash of solar development? At the start of 2025—in an attempt to rein in the renewables sector—Beijing announced that it would discontinue a long-standing policy that had effectively propped up renewable energy prices, pegging them to that of the “baseline” coal power in each province. Any solar capacity that went in after May 2025, Beijing declared, would no longer get this deal. So the all-out solar installation frenzy was simply a mass attempt to get in under the old terms.After May, sure enough, new solar deployments plummeted. The ensuing four months each added just 10 gigawatts of new solar on average, half of the prior year’s pace—but that’s still considerably faster than America at its peak.In China, one problem with all this burgeoning, majestic new solar is that it’s completely overwhelming the national electrical grid, technically and economically. For electricity markets to work, grid managers must constantly balance supply and demand—but the former can’t always be throttled back when it exceeds the latter. Nuclear power plants can’t just be switched on and off whenever solar power floods the grid. And some Chinese coal plants provide heat to communities through steam—so they need to run even if the electricity they generate is superfluous.One perverse result of all this energetic over-supply is that a lot of solar power simply gets wasted, or “curtailed,” to make way for dirty forms of energy that are harder to turn off. Another is that the inherently intermittent power of renewables simply makes it more challenging for managers to keep the grid stable. In August 2024, in China’s far western region of Xinjiang—where the renewables build-out is at its most grandiose—poorly handled voltage fluctuations from solar and wind caused a regional blackout and even threatened the national electrical system, according to the South China Morning Post.As challenging as the glut is to manage at the technical level, its economics are even more vexing. As Econ 101 teaches, prices go down when supply rises faster than demand. But in most markets, there’s an end point to this process: free. Electricity markets are different. Some power-generating entities (like the aforementioned coal and nuclear plants) are so loath to ramp down their production that they offer to pay for the privilege of continuing to generate power. This, combined with the absolute imperative to keep the grid balanced, can create negative prices, which have become common in China’s heavily populated Shandong Province. It’s an untenable situation, but energy-hungry industrial firms are happy to milk it. Decades ago, the metals giant Weiqiao Aluminum left the Shandong grid in favor of running its own captive coal fleet to power its smelters; this past year it plugged back into the grid to take advantage of cheaper rates coming from green tech.What’s more, Chinese solar manufacturers—who, if you’ll remember, might just be saving the world—are not even making money for their troubles. They’re struggling to survive a gauntlet of competition. At the root of the solar supply chain are makers of polysilicon, the purified silicon substrate base of panels. Oversupply of this product has caused prices and profits to collapse. The Chinese government has tried to get supply under control by pushing the strongest polysilicon firms to form a cartel and squeeze out lesser players who refuse to exit the market. But so far, this seems to be a long shot.Workers in Zhejiang Province manufacture solar infrastructure to be exported to Southeast Asia.
Getty ImagesThe story is similar higher up the supply chain: Manufacturing capacity to produce solar ingots, wafers, and panels exceeds demand, sparking profit-killing price wars as firms try to keep their market share. Meanwhile, rapid technological innovation keeps forcing firms to invest in expansion with the latest and greatest designs, lest they get left behind by their competitors. When a completely new breed of solar panels yields a 10 percent difference in generation capacity, manufacturers who fail to quickly set up new production lines do so at their own peril. For the consumer, this added capacity means more energy with less real estate, perhaps a smaller parcel of land to purchase for your solar farm. For the manufacturer, it means the difference between commanding a viable price versus being dumped in the remainder bin.As the oversupply of Chinese panels has spilled into the international market, the bizarre dynamics have spread with them. Just as in Shandong Province, negative prices for electricity have also become common in Germany, thanks to Chinese panels. Or take Pakistan. Around 2022, a global spike in natural gas prices made the Pakistani electrical grid even more expensive and less reliable than usual. But instead of just suffering or firing up diesel generators, millions of Pakistanis installed solar panels to free themselves from the grid. The country imported so many Chinese solar panels that the grid as a whole began to fall into what is called a death spiral. Customers started opting out, leaving the grid to charge ever higher prices, which led even more people to flee, and so on.Who benefits, aside from the environment? It’s actually hard to say. The Chinese government is one of the Pakistani grid’s major creditors. So Chinese firms are undermining the economics of major development projects funded by state-owned banks.If only there was more electrical storage—technology that holds solar power generated during the day and releases it in the evening—then a lot of the issues that torture China’s renewables market would be resolved. Solar panels would become more valuable to the grid, their generation wouldn’t have to be curtailed, and the producers would be able to sell more of their products at better prices. Of course, China has come to dominate this fast-growing sector as well: It is by far the world’s largest battery maker. But China’s electrical system hasn’t figured out the rules and pricing to push battery capacity onto the grid fast enough to keep up. And besides, the vast majority of the batteries that China is churning out do not end up in grid storage. They’re revolutionizing another increasingly Chinese-dominated green industry that is going fast, cheap, and out of control: automobiles.In 2018, the city of Shanghai lured Tesla in to build a gigafactory with what seemed like an especially attractive offer. For years, foreign automakers like Ford, GM, Volkswagen, and Toyota had dominated the Chinese car market—the world’s largest—but were required to form joint ventures with Chinese firms for the privilege of doing business in the country. Shanghai told Tesla it could fully own its Chinese operations. Subsidies for land and cheap loans were proffered as well.A major solar farm in Shandong Province.
Getty ImagesTesla’s Shanghai gigafactory was completed in 168 days. It quickly became Tesla’s largest in the world. And it was fed by a network of local component suppliers that cropped up around it. The only problem—for Tesla, anyway—was that those local firms eventually became the basis for a Chinese supply chain that supercharged the nascent electric vehicle sector in the country. Nearly overnight, firms like Nio and BYD were producing plug-in cars that could rival Tesla in cost and quality. As with solar, a wave of entrants battled for market share, causing profits to evaporate but giving consumers great choices at excellent prices.By 2024, nearly half of all cars sold in China had plugs. Internal combustion automakers in China are suffering or shuttering. And the reverberations are perhaps even stronger abroad. China shifted from an also-ran to the world’s dominant auto exporter over the past five years, displacing Japan, South Korea, and Germany. It shipped more than 5.5 million cars overseas in 2024. Other countries have begun to panic that their own auto sectors could be eviscerated by the competition of cheaper, cleaner vehicles from China. The United States has effectively banned imports from China, while Europe has imposed serious tariffs.Yet just like in the solar sector, where thin profits and high debts have turned some firms into sprinting zombies, the Chinese EV space is full of failed and failing enterprises. Even BYD, the biggest player globally, seems to be dangerously close to spinning out of control. Its sales over the past few months have faltered badly compared with the previous year, and murmurs about its debt burden lead some to wonder if it too might collapse—even as people around the world are still dying to get their hands on these cars, and other automakers strain to compete.Indeed, the greatest beneficiaries of China’s renewables revolution may, in fact, be consumers, both inside and outside of China. In sun-blessed Australia, where rooftop solar panels sit atop nearly a third of all households, the country’s energy minister, Chris Bowen, proposed a “solar sharer program” to offer three hours of free electricity on sunny days. Solar and battery systems have allowed Hawaii to close its final coal power plant, and such systems are similarly helping other islands like Jamaica to reduce their need for imported fossil fuels.One country—one leader, especially—is trying to buck this trend. Donald Trump hates many people and things, but wind turbines and solar panels seem to hold a special place of contempt in his heart. His administration has attempted to cancel major offshore and onshore wind projects, along with plans for Esmerelda 7, a solar megabase slotted for the Nevada desert that would have been worthy of Western China. Trump and his energy secretary, Chris Wright, often speak of American energy dominance, but they are crippling American firms’ ability to deploy and build the cheapest sources of electricity in the history of this planet, in favor of a combination of long-in-the-tooth arguments about fossil inevitability and long-shot bets on small modular nuclear reactors and, yes, fusion.Even among billionaires who don’t share Trump’s belief that climate change is a hoax, this latter affinity for far-out, breakthrough technologies has long been a hallmark of American climate investment and philanthropy. This attitude is epitomized by Bill Gates, who once dismissed existing green technologies like solar and wind power as “cute.” Instead, Gates has always preferred a lordly, capital-intensive variety of decarbonization, plowing dollars into sci-fi technologies that remain in a perpetual state of being just five years away—not the rapid, messy approach involving solar panels sprouting on every rooftop and recalibrating electricity pricing schemes. (Recently, just as it was becoming clear that the transition to renewables was spiraling from success to success, Gates wrote a memo saying he was pulling back from climate funding altogether.)Mao Zedong famously declared that a revolution is not a dinner party. It is an insurrection, an act of violence by which one class overthrows another. The green tech revolution—whose violence is principally financial, a withering assault on the value of fossil firms’ assets—is not a dinner party. Nor is it inevitable. It could still be held back or slowed down. Yes, it is the result of the conscious choices made by people, firms, and governments, many of the most critical ones made in China. But it is happening now, and faster than our systems—electricity grids, industrial sectors, labor, geopolitics, and more—are ready for.And it’s a good thing, too, because there is another force powered by the sun’s fusion that is also arriving at a force and scale that we are not prepared for: climate change. When the Category 5 Hurricane Melissa tore through Jamaica, Haiti, Cuba, and the Dominican Republic in late October, killing more than 90 and leaving tens of thousands homeless, most government investments in protecting people from the storm were not up to the challenge. What did provide some refuge were rooftop solar panels, which kept the lights on when the sun rose the next morning. A global energy system undergirds modern life. Through all the chaos, that system is getting a major upgrade.Let us know what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor at mail@wired.com.CommentsBack to topTriangleMore From the China IssueHere are 23 ways China is rewiring the futureWhy your next robot coworker will probably be from ChinaHow a Western obsession made eastern China the crystal capital of the worldTrump declared a moon race with China. The US is losingChina’s Gen Z women are driving an AI boyfriend boomInside the Chinese government’s algorithm registryYou’ve never heard of China’s greatest sci-fi novelIn your inbox: The biggest tech news coming out of ChinaJeremy Wallace is a professor of China Studies at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. He is writing a book about China and the green tech revolution. ... Read MoreTopicslongreadsChinaSolarEnergyThe China Issueclimate changeRead MoreHow China’s ‘Crystal Capital’ Cornered the Market on a Western ObsessionDecades ago, Donghai was a backwater county. Today, thanks to an army of 24/7 livestreamers, it orchestrates a multibillion-dollar global industry.You’ve Never Heard of China’s Greatest Sci-Fi NovelMillions of words. Thousands of authors. The Morning Star of Lingao is barely known outside China—but it contains the secret to the country’s modernization and malaise.China’s AI Boyfriend Business Is Taking On a Life of Its OwnGen Z women in China are all in on digital companionship—even setting up dates with real-world versions of their AI boyfriends.Thousands of Companies Are Driving China’s AI Boom. A Government Registry Tracks Them AllHow the Cyberspace Administration of China inadvertently made a guide to the country’s homegrown AI revolution.She Was Given Up by Her Chinese Parents—and Spent 14 Years Trying to Find a Way BackMore and more Chinese adoptees in the US are trying to reunite with their birth parents. For Youxue, it took more than a decade, and a remarkable coincidence.He Went to Prison for Gene-Editing Babies. Now He’s Planning to Do It AgainChinese scientist He Jiankui wants to end Alzheimer’s and thinks Silicon Valley is conducting a “Nazi eugenic experiment.”Discovering the Dimensions of a New Cold WarThe United States’ plan for dealing with Putin’s Russia and Xi’s China remains ill-defined among a shifting global order. That must change.What to Consider Before Importing Smartphones From ChinaThe top Chinese smartphones are innovation-packed spec beasts, but it’s not always a good idea to import from the East.The Justice Department Released More Epstein Files—but Not the Ones Survivors WantThe DOJ says it still has “hundreds of thousands” of pages to review, as the latest Epstein files release spurred more pushback from Democratic lawmakers and other critics of the administration.US Trade Dominance Will Soon Begin to CrackSavvy countries will discover there’s a way to mitigate the harm incurred by Trump’s tariffs—and it’ll boost their own economies while making goods cheaper too.New Proposed Legislation Would Let Self-Driving Cars Operate in New York StateNew York governor Kathy Hochul says she will propose a new law allowing limited autonomous vehicle pilots in smaller cities. Full-blown services could be next.People Who Drink Bottled Water on a Daily Basis Ingest 90,000 More Microplastic Particles Each YearDrinking water in plastic bottles contains countless particles too small to see. New research finds that people who drink water from them on a daily basis ingest far more microplastics than those who don’t.WIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.SubscribeNewslettersTravelFAQWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesWearablesCouponsGift GuidesAdvertiseContact UsManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

China’s Renewable Energy Revolution Is a Huge Mess That Might Save the World

The global surge in cheap Chinese renewable energy power is reshaping the world, creating a chaotic transformation with far-reaching consequences. No one is properly prepared for the scale of this shift, and the situation is far from a neatly managed, top-down project. Instead, it’s a runaway train of competition, marked by decimated coal communities, price wars, destabilizing electrical grids, and a complete lack of direction. By 2024, China's solar supply chain was pumping out a staggering 1 terawatt of panels annually – more than the entire planet’s capacity.

Within China itself, vast renewable energy megabases stretch across Western deserts and the Tibetan highlands, generating power equivalent to multiple nuclear plants and feeding it into Eastern population centers via ultrahigh-voltage power lines. Even at smaller scales, solar panels have proliferated across rooftops throughout densely populated areas. In Europe, Chinese-made photovoltaic panels were so inexpensive that they cost less than fencing materials—a critical turning point. Globally, the glut of solar has driven the average cost of electricity to an unprecedented 4 cents per kilowatt hour, arguably the cheapest form of energy ever produced.

However, this seemingly positive trend is marred by significant disruption. By 2024, the United States had added a record-breaking 50 gigawatts of solar capacity, largely due to China’s influence. Yet, the emergence of this massive renewable sector has created a complex web of challenges. China’s relentless pace in deploying solar capacity has resulted in an overwhelming surge, fundamentally destabilizing national electrical grids, both technically and economically. Managing electricity markets requires balancing supply and demand—a task complicated by the intermittent nature of solar power and the inability of nuclear plants to be readily switched on and off. Paradoxically, the oversupply led to substantial amounts of solar power being “curtailed” to accommodate more easily controlled, dirtier energy sources.

The immense quantities of solar-generated energy have triggered negative electricity prices in regions like Shandong Province, where energy-intensive industrial firms profited by continually drawing electricity from the grid—a phenomenon that reflects a fundamental flaw in the established pricing models. Moreover, China’s dominance in solar manufacturing has led to severe losses for the companies involved, as they struggle to compete in a market flooded with cheap panels. The polysilicon supply chain, a crucial component of solar panel production, has been decimated by oversupply, causing prices to plummet and profits to vanish. While the Chinese government has attempted to control supply through cartel formation, its efforts have been largely unsuccessful.

The ripple effects of China’s transformative energy revolution extend globally. Pakistan, facing high natural gas prices, relied heavily on imported Chinese solar panels, which led to a catastrophic “death spiral” in its electrical grid—customers fled, leaving the grid decaying further, escalating prices, and ultimately creating a vicious cycle. Ultimately, the oversupply of Chinese panels has impacted electric markets, driving negative prices into existence across the globe – including Germany.

Despite the challenges, there's a potential for benefits. China's efforts are helping to restructure global energy markets and potentially transitioning towards a greener future. However, the situation is far from resolved. The speed at which China is deploying solar technology poses significant risks, and the lack of proactive adjustments to grid management structures and price controls create substantial uncertainty.