Our collective obsession with boredom: Interview with a boredom lab researcher

Recorded: Jan. 23, 2026, noon

Original

Summarized

Why the Do Nothing Challenge Doesn’t Do Much for You

Search for:

Channels

Topics

About

Newsletter

Become a member

Shop

Channels

Art+Science

Biology + Beyond

Catalysts of Discovery

Cosmos

Culture

Currents

Earth

Life

Mind

Ocean

One Question

Quanta Abstractions

Rewilding

Science at the Ballot Box

Science Philanthropy Alliance

Spark of Science

The Animal Issue

The Climates Issue

The Food Issue

The Kinship Issue

The Porthole

The Reality Issue

The Rebel Issue

Women in Science & Engineering

Topics

Anthropology

Arts

Astronomy

Communication

Economics

Environment

Evolution

General

Genetics

Geoscience

Health

History

Math

Microbiology

Neuroscience

Paleontology

Philosophy

Physics

Psychology

Sociology

Technology

Zoology

Already a member? Log in

Geoscience

Tiny Evidence Upends a Controversial Stonehenge Theory

Astronomy

Space Dust Could Contain Building Blocks of Life

Anthropology

The First Person to Get Hit by Space Junk

History

A Closer Look at an Elusive Ancient Plague

Psychology

Motivation Can Profoundly Shape Your Memories

Zoology

How Giant Kangaroos Moved Across Ancient Australia

Technology

When Passenger Planes Surpassed the Speed of Sound

Neuroscience

The Brain Might Not Function Like We Thought It Did

Astronomy

Detailed View of Solar Flare Birth Caught for the First Time

Zoology

The Promiscuous Lives of Beluga Whales

Health

How Being a Good Dad Makes for Healthier Children

Microbiology

Heartworms Might Be Much More Ancient Than We Thought

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

Psychology

Why the Do Nothing Challenge Doesn’t Do Much for You

Boredom lab researcher James Danckert says our collective obsession is misplaced

By Kristen French

January 17, 2026

Add a comment

Facebook

Twitter

Pocket

Unravel the biggest ideas in science today. Become a more curious you.

The full Nautilus archive
•
eBooks & Special Editions
•
Ad-free reading

The full Nautilus archive
eBooks & Special Editions
Ad-free reading

Subscribe to Nautilus

Explore

They sit alone in a room, expressionless, doing absolutely nothing, giant timers clocking down the hours and minutes. No books, no devices, no food, no distractions, no sleep. It’s a challenge some Gen-Zers are setting for themselves on TikTok—the “Do Nothing” challenge. The idea is to deliberately court boredom to restore depleted attention spans, a salve for the frantic overstimulation of our distracted age. Some of these videos accumulate millions of views.

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

It’s a new twist on an old idea. Over a decade ago, South Korean artist Woopsyang started the “Space-Out Competition” to combat burnout. Since then, the urge for stillness has evolved in many forms, including the recent mania for rawdogging, a term that’s come to mean enduring any mundane activity without aids, particularly long flights. That trend became such a sensation that the American Dialect Society chose rawdog as its Word of the Year in 2024.
@sspencerevans What a productive day! #fypシ #challenge #worldrecord #meme #brainrot #sigmagrindset #sigma #antipiracy #vexbolts #unemployment #unemployed #challenges ♬ Montagem Lunar Diamante – Slowed – DJ DYLANFK & WXCHSXN & MC SILLVEER

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

But the Do Nothing challenge and the rawdogging trend suggest a fundamental misunderstanding of how boredom and disconnection work, says James Danckert, a researcher in the Boredom Lab at the University of Waterloo. Boredom is closer to hunger than to holiness, he argues, and forcing it on yourself for hours on end doesn’t by itself have restorative power. Instead, the feeling suggests something about your attention, agency, or meaning is out of alignment.I spoke with Danckert about why we’re so fascinated with boredom in this cultural moment, why some people have more trouble with boredom than others, and his frustration with the stubborn idea that boredom is fertile territory for creativity.Why do you think we’re so fascinated by boredom of late?In the early 2000s, we’d start all of our scientific papers with “boredom is an understudied phenomena,” but we can’t do that anymore because in the last 20 years, a lot more people have begun researching it. Some of the recent work aims to understand the relationship between social media and boredom. You might think that there’s so much at our fingertips now, surely boredom is gonna go away. But what we’re finding is that it’s actually increasing. So one speculation is that our capacity to connect well is diminishing, and as that’s happening, we’re getting more bored.

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

Read more: “What Boredom Does to You”It seems like boredom means a lot of different things to different people. Is there a good standard scientific definition of boredom?There’s a distinction to be made here that’s important. State boredom is the in-the-moment feeling of “I am bored right now.” Functionally what is it doing? It is meant to signal to you that what you’re doing right now isn’t working. You need to do something else. And then there’s trait boredom, or boredom proneness. These are individuals who experience boredom frequently and intensely, and it makes them feel like their lives are just lacking in meaning.

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

Are there any real downsides to forced boredom? These TikTokers who are filming themselves doing nothing for hours and hours and hours. Is that actually restorative?The ultimate goal of in-the-moment feelings of boredom is to eliminate itself. Boredom wants to not exist, right? And so, to embrace boredom and say, “Oh, I’m gonna try and rawdog it on this flight for 12 hours.” It’s just a stunt. And it’s not listening well to what boredom is actually telling you, which is to find something meaningful to do.
@kareemrahma Just rawdogged my longest flight yet. #bareback #rawdog #airplanes #flights #travel ♬ Motivational – Vioo Sound

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

But the other thing is that they’re misconceiving their own needs. They don’t want boredom. They want disconnection. And that’s perfectly fine. We used to talk about this in other ways: vegging out, or just relaxation for Christ’s sake. So anything that takes you out of the normal everyday stresses that we all experience. But I think we ought to intentionally choose those times and activities that are our disconnection times—and rawdogging boredom ain’t it. That’s just a fundamentally dumb idea. In the one or two examples that I’ve looked at, what I saw is that they’re uncomfortable, right? So they’re at least experiencing one of the key features of boredom. But when you want to disconnect from the hustle and bustle of your life, why would you intentionally engage in a thing that feels bad? It doesn’t make sense to me.People claim that boredom is like a form of mindfulness, or it helps them address feelings and thoughts that maybe they were too afraid to confront. And both of these things can certainly be uncomfortable. How do you know the difference between the discomfort of boredom and say the discomfort of mindfulness or meditation?Mindfulness practice, as I understand it, isn’t typically described as uncomfortable. It might allow you to deal with thoughts and experiences in your life that themselves are uncomfortable. But the practice of being mindful is generally considered to be quite positive, I would think. Mindfulness is also a practice. It’s a thing that takes time to get good at. So you can’t hope to just do a one-hour session of mindfulness and solve all of your problems. You need to practice this over a number of months and years.In 2014, Timothy Wilson and his group published a research paper titled “Just Think.” They put people in a room for 15 minutes with nothing but their thoughts. They took away their cell phones. There was nothing to look at in the room. You couldn’t do anything. You just had to sit in a chair, you and your thoughts. Then they asked you how it felt. And one thing that got lost in the media frenzy around this particular paper was that actually one-third of the participants rated the experience to be quite pleasant. One-third were ambivalent, and one-third hated it. They just thought it was boring and terrible. Again, the paper included nine experiments, but the one that got the media attention was this one that involved either sitting in a room for 15 minutes with nothing but your thoughts—or you could self-administer an electric shock.

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

@zoewrrld yes ♬ IS THIS LOVE (Instrumental) – XG
And people had experienced these electric shocks before the 15 minutes began. They’d rated them to feel negative and bad. They’d said that they would pay certain amounts of money to not experience them again. And then when you put them in there for the 15 minutes, still some significant percentage—more men than women—administered these electric shocks, rather than sit there and do nothing. One guy administered 196 electric shocks in 15 minutes to himself. To me, what that says is that we evolved for action, not for thought. Thought is a great and wonderful thing. Language is a great and wonderful thing. But we evolved to control our bodies and interact with the environment around us.Boredom is also common where we feel constrained—when we have no autonomy and no agency. So we don’t feel like we can act in ways that we want to act. So these are examples and data that suggest that rawdogging boredom on a flight is just a silly idea. It’s going against what we’re actually evolved to do. Instead, what you might want to do is to say, “Okay, I’ve got a boring flight ahead of me. What would be a meaningful thing that I can do?” It could be something as simple as trying to complete the hardest Sudoku you’ve ever done. It doesn’t have to be meaningful in the sense of curing cancer, but something that matters to you is a better thing to attempt on a long flight than just trying to sit with it and do nothing.

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

You mentioned earlier that some people are more prone to boredom, and in other talks I’ve heard you say that this is connected to problems with self-control and self-esteem. Why?We’re actually still working on that. But self-control seems to be a cluster of processes that allows you to effectively pursue your goals. It allows you to marshal your thoughts, actions, and emotions in the pursuit of what matters to you. Often what you see in the literature is that people talk about self-control primarily as a challenge of inhibition. But for boredom proneness, I actually think that it’s a different kind of self-control that they struggle with—what we call a struggle to launch into action. When a young 5-year-old child comes to you and says, “I’m bored,” you, as a parent, tend to have this sort of knee-jerk reaction to say, “Why don’t you do this? Why don’t you go play with your Legos? Why don’t you go play outside? Why don’t you go and do a drawing? Why don’t you read a book?” The child knows all of those options are available. They just don’t want those things at this time. That’s the problem of boredom proneness. You don’t want what’s available right now, and you don’t know what you do want.That’s so interesting because a study just came out about motivation in macaques, specifically related to getting started on a task, even one that’s expected to be rewarding. They found basically that there’s this one circuit in the basal ganglia of the brain that when it’s inhibited, the monkeys could get started, even if the reward came with an unpleasant punishment. Whereas if the circuit was active, they couldn’t. As far as you know, is there a signature of boredom in the brain?

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

So the answer to that would be no. There’s really great work from Lisa Feldman Barrett talking about this notion of signatures of any kinds of affective experiences. And I think we’ve been hunting for that for decades. You know, what’s the signature of happiness? What’s the signature of anger? The answer is, there just really isn’t one physiological or neurological signature. We have these large-scale networks that are important for interacting with the world. And there’s just a ton of overlap.But one part of the brain that seems to be very interesting for boredom is the insular cortex, which is very important for representing what we call interoceptive sensations, or internal body sensations. So feelings of hunger and thirst, butterflies in the stomach, a racing heart. And what Feldman Barrett suggests—she focuses a lot on depression and a little bit on anxiety—is that we use these internal body states to predict how we’re going to feel later on. So the boredom-prone person might just have faulty anticipation of reward. They might not know what’s going to feel good. They might not know what’s going to be engaging or might not be using these internal signals accurately. We’ve published some work on that that shows that people who are boredom-prone pay a lot more attention to their internal body states, but they’re kind of confused by them. They don’t make sense of them as well. There’s a concept known as alexithymia, which is the difficulty of labeling and discriminating your affective states, and people who are boredom-prone tend to have higher levels of alexithymia, as well.Some researchers suggest there’s a relationship between boredom and creativity. Do you think there is any merit there?The creativity idea has been a bit of a bugbear of mine, and a number of my colleagues who do boredom research feel this way, too. I think there’s this great desire in people to want to believe that boredom will somehow make you creative. But if you think about it, the logic just doesn’t work. So I start thinking about, “Where does the desire come from?” Famous people will often say, “I was bored, so I did X.” And because we look up to famous artists, we think, “Oh wow, boredom must be a really helpful tool in making you creative.”

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

The story I’ve used in the past a lot is from Jimi Hendrix. Somebody sees Jimi Hendrix play for the first time, and is just blown away and corners him backstage and says, “Man, where have you been hiding?” And Hendrix replies, “I’ve been playing the Chitlin’ Circuit, and I was bored shitless.” A Chitlin’ Circuit was something in the ’50s and ’60s in America that was a sort of safe circuit of venues for Black Americans to perform anything from stand-up comedy to music to whatever. But the kind of music that was expected in the Chitlin’ Circuit was old and not to Hendrix’s liking. So he did something else and became the guitar virtuoso that we know. But the logic there is all wrong. Boredom didn’t make Hendrix a genius. Practice made Hendrix a genius. Trying to do different things made Hendrix a genius.Creativity is a wonderful solution to boredom, but you can’t hope that it works the other way around. So the paper from 2014 that everybody cites that says boredom makes you creative: There’s loads and loads of problems with that paper. We tried to replicate it and found the opposite: The more bored we made people, the less creative they were.
@themichaelbarrymore Not even any music on, did this in silence 😶‍🌫️ #timepass ♬ Lullaby for Erik – Evgeny Grinko

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

I would think that people who get bored easily tend to seek out novelty more.That’s a reasonable conclusion to come to, but we have actually struggled to find that. People who are prone to boredom want novelty, but they fail to launch into action. Now, the temporary state itself might work exactly in the way that you suggested—that it pushes you toward novelty seeking. But novelty seeking alone isn’t gonna make you creative either. It’s what you do with that novelty, what you do with the new thing that you find and come back to practice.You have mentioned elsewhere that animals feel boredom. How do we know?

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

I don’t know if you’ve ever seen a mink in the wild. They scamper around. They look like they’re mischievous little creatures. And we still farm them for their fur, which is disgusting. But what Georgia Mason and Rebecca Meagher did is they had two groups of mink housed in different types of cages. One group is in cages that we normally keep them in on our fur farms, where there’s just nothing for them to do. Very boring. The other one was a cage that had lots of little things for the mink to play with. They housed these two groups for two weeks in the different types of cages. At the end of the two weeks, they exposed the animals to different kinds of items. They exposed them first to items that the animal would normally approach—apparently for mink, a toothbrush is like a laser pointer for a cat. They just go crazy for it. They love toothbrushes. So they expose ‘em to something like that, that they would normally approach. Then they’d expose them to things that they’d normally avoid—the silhouette of a predator or the smell of urine of a predator. Things that they would shy away from. And then the third group of things was neutral stuff. Stuff the animals had seen before—just a bottle of water or something like that.The logic was this: If the animals in the cage with nothing to do were depressed, they’d show less interest in the toothbrush stuff they normally liked ‘cause they were depressed. If they were apathetic after the two weeks in the cages, they’d show no interest in anything. They wouldn’t show approach or avoidance behavior. They wouldn’t care about any of the items. If they were bored, they’d approach everything—and they’d approach even things that they’d normally avoid, like the silhouette of the predator. And that’s exactly what they found. The minks in the cage with nothing to do for two weeks rapidly—more rapidly than the other group—and indiscriminately approached all kinds of items as if they were desperate for stimulation and just wanted something to do.What made you want to study boredom?Two things motivated me to get into boredom research. One was that, as a late teen, early 20-something young person, I started to experience boredom a lot and hated it. I wanted to find ways to eliminate it from my life. I no longer think that that’s either possible or desirable. But around about the same time, my brother had a motor vehicle crash where he suffered a fairly serious brain injury. Months later, after serious rehabilitation, he’d report that he was bored a lot. And to me, that suggested that something organic had changed in his brain. Some consequence of that brain injury made things that were once pleasurable seem boring. And so, I wanted to understand what had happened in the brain to make that the case for him.Has studying boredom helped you feel less bored?

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

I don’t think studying it has made me feel less bored. I think time has made me feel less bored. That’s one of the things that the data shows: Boredom rises in our teenage years and then starts to drop off in the late teens and early 20s. There’s a great study from Alycia Chin and colleagues called “Bored in the USA.” In our middle decades, when we’re busy with our careers, our children and all that kinda stuff, boredom drops off, because you don’t have time for it. Then it starts to rise again in the 60s and 70s. And what we’re starting to pursue a little bit more is that that’s probably about loneliness as much as anything. And so, in those later decades, people who are more socially connected experience boredom less. There’s some great work from my colleague Mark Fenske, who’s shown recently that hearing loss in the elderly is predictive of boredom.So studying boredom hasn’t made me less bored, but over time and with all of the pressures of life, I don’t feel bored nearly as much as I used to. I’m hopeful that in my later decades I’ll pay attention to social connection—and avoid boredom. Lead image: Master1305 / Shutterstock

Nautilus Members enjoy an ad-free experience.

Log in

or

Join now
.

Kristen French

Posted on January 17, 2026

Kristen French is an associate editor at Nautilus. She has worked in science journalism since 2013, reporting and writing features and news for publications such as Wired, Backchannel, The Verge, and New York Magazine. She has a masters degree in science journalism from Columbia University.

Geoscience
Tiny Evidence Upends a Controversial Stonehenge Theory

Astronomy
Space Dust Could Contain Building Blocks of Life

Anthropology
The First Person to Get Hit by Space Junk

View / Add Comments

Fuel your wonder. Feed your curiosity. Expand your mind.

Access the entire Nautilus archive, ad-free on any device.

Explore Subscriptions

Explore

Tiny Evidence Upends a Controversial Stonehenge Theory

By Molly Glick

January 22, 2026

Geoscience

Researchers curious about the monument’s origins stuck their heads in the sand—for good reason

Explore

Space Dust Could Contain Building Blocks of Life

By Jake Currie

January 22, 2026

Astronomy

Protein precursors can form in cosmic dust clouds

Explore

The First Person to Get Hit by Space Junk

By Molly Glick

January 22, 2026

Anthropology

Decades later, extraterrestrial rubbish is quickly piling up

Explore

A Closer Look at an Elusive Ancient Plague

By Molly Glick

January 22, 2026

History

Teeth have revealed that victims traveled from far-off homelands

Explore

Motivation Can Profoundly Shape Your Memories

By Kristen French

January 22, 2026

Psychology

Different moods may determine what details you remember and how you recall them later

NAUTILUS: SCIENCE CONNECTED
Nautilus is a different kind of science magazine. Our stories take you into the depths of
science and spotlight its ripples in our lives and cultures.

Get the Nautilus newsletter
Cutting-edge science, unraveled by the very brightest living thinkers.

NL – Footer

Email:
*

Captcha

If you are human, leave this field blank.

Quick links

Home
About Us
Contact
FAQ
Prime
Ebook
Shop

Donate
Awards and Press
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
RSS
Jobs
Newsletter
Ethics Policy

Social

1/2FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTHBecome a Nautilus member for unlimited, ad-free access.Subscribe now×

2/2FREE ARTICLES THIS MONTHThis is your last free article. Get full access, without ads.Subscribe now×

Literary and always interesting.
To read this story, sign up for the free Nautilus newsletter: science and culture for people who love beautiful writing.

NL – Emailgate

Captcha

If you are human, leave this field blank.

The “Do Nothing” challenge, as popularized by a range of online trends from TikTok to more academic explorations, reveals a surprisingly complex and potentially misplaced cultural fascination with boredom. James Danckert, a researcher at the University of Waterloo’s Boredom Lab, argues that our collective obsession with intentionally inducing boredom is fundamentally misguided. He posits that boredom isn’t a state to be actively sought, but rather a signal – a communication from the brain that something about your situation is out of alignment. It’s closer to hunger, he suggests, a demand for change, rather than a desirable or restorative experience.

Danckert’s research, and that of others – including the intriguing “Space-Out Competition” initiated by Woopsyang – highlights a growing awareness of how modern life, saturated with stimuli and constant connectivity, is actually *increasing* boredom. The simple fact that we’re bombarded with information and the pressure to be constantly engaged seems to have created an environment where meaningful disconnection—and, consequently, genuine boredom—is becoming rarer. This isn't to say that boredom is inherently good; it can be uncomfortable and unpleasant. However, Danckert emphasizes that the core issue isn’t the feeling itself, but our reaction to it.

The allure of the “Do Nothing” challenge stems from a desire to reclaim agency and control in a world increasingly driven by external forces. Individuals attempting to force boredom, as seen in the TikTok videos, are essentially misinterpreting the signal. They’re trying to actively *make* themselves bored when what they actually need is a shift in activity or perspective. The very act of attempting to “rawdog” it—as it’s popularly termed—amplifies the discomfort and reinforces the unwelcome state.

Crucially, Danckert’s research highlights a distinction between “in-the-moment” boredom and trait boredom. The former is a transient signal, a demand for change. The latter represents a more persistent condition, potentially linked to deeper issues like a lack of self-control, diminished self-esteem, or difficulties with “alexithymia”—the inability to articulate or understand one’s emotions. The research on the infamous Jimi Hendrix and the “Space-Out Competition” further illustrates this point, showing the crucial distinction between actively seeking a state of boredom and experiencing boredom as a consequence of a fundamental imbalance.

The widespread fascination with boredom challenges assumptions about creativity and human fulfillment. While the idea of boredom as a catalyst for artistic inspiration has been widely circulated, Danckert’s work suggests that this is often a misconception. True creativity arises from engagement, experimentation, and the willingness to grapple with challenging ideas and situations—not from passively enduring an uncomfortable state. Moreover, his research has revealed the vital role of social connection, and the impact of loneliness, in triggering states of boredom.

Ultimately, Danckert’s work calls for a fundamental shift in our understanding of boredom. Instead of viewing it as a state to be eliminated or harnessed, we should approach it as a valuable signal—a call for attention, reflection, and ultimately, a more meaningful engagement with our lives.