Get ready for the AI ad-pocalypse | The VergeSkip to main contentThe homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.The VergeThe Verge logo.TechReviewsScienceEntertainmentAIPolicyHamburger Navigation ButtonThe homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.Hamburger Navigation ButtonNavigation DrawerThe VergeThe Verge logo.Login / Sign UpcloseCloseSearchTechExpandAmazonAppleFacebookGoogleMicrosoftSamsungBusinessSee all techGadgetsExpandLaptopsPhonesTVsHeadphonesSpeakersWearablesSee all gadgetsReviewsExpandSmart Home ReviewsPhone ReviewsTablet ReviewsHeadphone ReviewsSee all reviewsAIExpandOpenAIAnthropicSee all AIVerge ShoppingExpandBuying GuidesDealsGift GuidesSee all shoppingPolicyExpandAntitrustPoliticsLawSecuritySee all policyScienceExpandSpaceEnergyEnvironmentHealthSee all scienceEntertainmentExpandTV ShowsMoviesAudioSee all entertainmentGamingExpandXboxPlayStationNintendoSee all gamingStreamingExpandDisneyHBONetflixYouTubeCreatorsSee all streamingTransportationExpandElectric CarsAutonomous CarsRide-sharingScootersSee all transportationFeaturesVerge VideoExpandTikTokYouTubeInstagramPodcastsExpandDecoderThe VergecastVersion HistoryNewslettersExpandThe Verge DailyInstallerVerge DealsNotepadOptimizerRegulatorThe StepbackArchivesStoreSubscribeFacebookThreadsInstagramYoutubeRSSThe VergeThe Verge logo.Get ready for the AI ad-pocalypseComments DrawerCommentsLoading commentsGetting the conversation ready...ReportCloseReportPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ReportAICloseAIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All AITechCloseTechPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All TechGet ready for the AI ad-pocalypse2026 will be the year that we really start to see AI-generated commercials and marketing content everywhere.2026 will be the year that we really start to see AI-generated commercials and marketing content everywhere.by Jess WeatherbedCloseJess WeatherbedNews ReporterPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Jess WeatherbedJan 24, 2026, 3:00 PM UTCLinkShareGiftOf course ad agencies love AI commercials, this Kalshi ad only cost $2,000 to make. Image: KalshiJess WeatherbedCloseJess WeatherbedPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Jess Weatherbed is a news writer focused on creative industries, computing, and internet culture. Jess started her career at TechRadar, covering news and hardware reviews.I’ll confess, with no shame whatsoever, that I really love ads. Artsy ones, funny ones, weird ones, emotional ones — TV commercials were my childhood TikTok before any of us were using terms like “short-form video.” But like most creative things in my life, AI is sucking the joy out of it. And it’s only going to suck harder this year.Ads are mini-movies, posters, illustrations, and photoshoots with an underlying purpose: to burn whatever product they’re flogging into your brain as quickly as possible. It requires a great deal of creativity, and in some cases, a substantial production budget. And while the creative in me loves to see the fruits of that labor, it also makes ads the ideal testing ground for generative AI technology, as brands race to make content creation faster and cheaper. Many image and video generator models saw huge visual improvements last year, prompting more advertisers to adopt them in campaigns.According to a Marketing Week study, more than half of 1,000 polled brand marketers used some variant of AI in their creative campaigns in 2025. Another study by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) found that 90 percent of advertisers were using, or planning to use, generative AI for video ads in 2025, and projected that such tools would be used in 40 percent of all ads by 2026.That’s why we’re increasingly seeing AI ads on TV, in magazines, and across social media. Some are upfront about using generative AI, such as Coca-Cola’s sloppy holiday ads, but many aren’t — leaving us to be suspicious of everything we see that appears slightly “off.” Sometimes, that can be humans who give off uncanny valley vibes, like the ads we’ve seen from McDonalds and DoorDash where the people look too polished and move in unnatural ways. Or perhaps CGI and visual effects that morph inconsistently in ways that would be weird for a VFX artist to do intentionally, like this ad for Original Source shower gel. Why does that man’s face keep changing? Why does it keep trying to turn him into a Memoji?But while generation in commercials might seem obvious to some, clocking AI in the wild isn’t something most humans are good at yet. The Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) found that humans could only accurately identify AI-generated images, video, and audio 50 percent of the time, and that’s one of the higher success rates we’ve seen. Kantar, the market research company that helped to develop Coca-Cola’s AI holiday campaign in 2024, also found that most of its ad testers couldn’t tell it was AI-generated, despite the tell-tale visuals and clear on-screen AI disclosure.“The vast majority of people didn’t notice the ad was AI-generated (we asked)”“The people that matter most – Coca-Cola’s target audience – still enjoy it, feel good when they see it, and love the brand for it,” Kantar managing director Dom Boyd told Campaign. “Lots. In fact, Kantar’s [ad testing] shows that the vast majority of people didn’t notice the ad was AI-generated (we asked), and the execution is one of the highest-performing this year for short-term sales potential.”Audience reactions to AI ads have been mixed, however. In a November 2025 Kantar study, consumers were discouraged by ads that featured obvious AI signals like “distracting or unnatural visuals,” but responded well to ads that used AI well enough to go largely undetected. The same study also found that people have stronger emotional reactions to AI-generated ads compared to those made without it — but the reactions in question were typically negative.We see much of that negativity around obvious AI advertisements across forums and in the comments on social media platforms. There’s even an r/AiSlopAds subreddit community dedicated to publicly shaming examples of AI ads. There are several commonly mentioned reasons for this sentiment, including ethical and environmental concerns around generative AI, seeing its supposed cost-cutting and efficiency benefits as something that cheapens branding, and just thinking it looks unappealing.Money (duh) is the obvious reason why more brands are increasingly ready to risk that negativity to explore generative AI. Sure, AI ads for prediction market platform Kalshi are scorned by Reddit users, but a particularly bonkers and confusing example that aired during a primetime 2025 NBA finals slot only cost $2,000 to make. It was created in just two days by one person using Google’s Veo 3 AI model. It’s not hard to see the appeal of that efficiency, and passionate hatred of an ad does indicate people found it memorable, even if it’s for the wrong reasons.A memorable ad can become a company’s legacy. The famous “Just Do It” (1988) Nike slogan was created for the fitness company’s first major television campaign by Wieden and Kennedy, with relatable commercials that featured everyday people doing their workouts. UK readers may also recall the 1999 Guinness “Surfer” commercial (directed by Jonathan Glazer with the ABM BBDO ad agency), an internationally acclaimed masterpiece of advertising that took nine days to film in Hawaii, using pioneering visual effects to merge live-action, heavy-water surfing with CGI horses.The production budgets for commercials aren’t frequently disclosed, but when made traditionally, they can cost a pretty penny. The media spend for Old Spice’s “The Man Your Man Could Smell Like” is estimated to be $10 million, which was smaller than many major ad campaigns that also aired in 2010. There’s also the iconic “1984” commercial directed by Ridley Scott to introduce the Apple Macintosh computer, which reportedly had a then-unprecedented production budget of $900,000, equivalent to $2.8 million in 2026.These famous ads aren’t memorable for being crap. Coca-Cola says that its AI holiday commercials are successful, but they just replicated its iconic red truck campaign, something that already had decades of positive nostalgia through genuine human creativity and production efforts.But while creating a successful campaign entirely through generative AI may be challenging now, it will become easier as tools and models continue to improve. The tech and media world is banking on it now that major brands like Nestlé, Mondelez, and Coca-Cola have already set a precedent. Google and Microsoft have produced ads using their own generative AI models, and Amazon is giving sellers tools to fill its site with AI ads. Meta is expected to roll out fully automated AI ads on its social platforms this year, and Nvidia is building tools that can serve up an infinite variety of custom personalized video ads.“I don’t spend any time worrying about whether AI is going to take over for us as humans”Even the marketers behind beloved, iconic ads are on board. ABM BBDO has launched its own AI platform, and Wieden and Kennedy is openly using AI in its production pipelines. “I think AI is an incredibly powerful tool, but it’s still a tool,” Wieden and Kennedy CEO Neal Arthur said in a LinkedIn News interview. “I think it allows us to scale more efficiently, but I don’t spend any time worrying about whether AI is going to take over for us as humans.”Generative AI usage is expected to be so pervasive in advertising this year that early trends are already anticipating a resistance movement, one that aims to build loyalty with consumers who are seeking to avoid synthetic content.“2026 will be the year of ‘things AI can’t do,’ or more truthfully, things AI can’t do (very well yet),” Thom Glover, founder of creative agency American Haiku, said in AdAge’s creativity predictions report. “Expect messy, hand-drawn, roughly textured or erratically collaged design, ideas that take pleasure in playing with the boundaries of what an ad is, and the return to the simple pleasures of 16mm film, analog recording, and ‘leaving in the mistakes.’”Some brands have already joined this resistance. Aerie’s promise not to use AI in its ads was the clothing brand’s most popular Instagram post last year, and Polaroid advertised its Flip instant camera with bus posters that poked fun at the technology, one reading “AI can’t generate sand between your toes.”“We are such an analog brand that basically gave us the permission: We can own that conversation,” Polaroid’s creative director Patricia Varella told Business Insider. “That layer of imperfection that makes us human and beautifully imperfect — something we think is important to remind people.”Some generative AI tools can now mimic analog and retro medium styles rather effectively, which will make distinguishing them from human-made content even harder.Many tools are catered to delivering content that looks too polished, however, creating an echo chamber in which everything starts to look the same without human-creativity to differentiate it. It’s also easier to spot mistakes in images and videos that strive for such perfection. Every unnatural hallucination and unexplained visual error implies that the project didn’t include any human creative professionals to identify or correct them. And advertisers are finding that they care less and less about creativity in their campaigns, with a recent study from IAB showing that cost efficiency, time savings, and scalability are being prioritized going forward.With that in mind, I’m begging brands and marketing agencies to remember that a good ad doesn’t need to be expensive or challenging to produce by hand. One of the best commercials of all time was achieved by filming a bunch of dude yelling “WASSUUUUUP” at each other while drinking a Budweiser. That’s something that can only be manifested by delightful human weirdness.Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.Jess WeatherbedCloseJess WeatherbedNews ReporterPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Jess WeatherbedAICloseAIPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All AICreatorsCloseCreatorsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All CreatorsReportCloseReportPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ReportTechCloseTechPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All TechMost PopularMost PopularTesla finally kills Autopilot in a bid to boost FSD subscriptionsClaude Code is suddenly everywhere inside MicrosoftWhy this winter storm will likely be a wild oneGoogle won’t stop replacing our news headlines with terrible AISony announces its first turntables in yearsThe Verge DailyA free daily digest of the news that matters most.Email (required)Sign UpBy submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Advertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native adMore in ReportWhat TikTok’s new owners mean for your feedGiving your healthcare info to a chatbot is, unsurprisingly, a terrible ideaEpic and Google have a secret $800 million Unreal Engine and services dealThe state attorneys general are as mad as you areBig games are getting bigger — and so are the stakesAnthropic’s new Claude ‘constitution’: be helpful and honest, and don’t destroy humanityWhat TikTok’s new owners mean for your feedEmma RothJan 23Giving your healthcare info to a chatbot is, unsurprisingly, a terrible ideaRobert HartJan 23Epic and Google have a secret $800 million Unreal Engine and services dealAdi Robertson and Sean HollisterJan 22The state attorneys general are as mad as you areSarah JeongJan 22Big games are getting bigger — and so are the stakesJay PetersJan 22Anthropic’s new Claude ‘constitution’: be helpful and honest, and don’t destroy humanityHayden FieldJan 21Advertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native adTop StoriesTwo hours agoGet stuff done by yelling at your phoneJan 23Why this winter storm will likely be a wild one8:00 AM UTCThe Loch Capsule dishwasher is small, fast, and efficient — it even sanitizes gadgetsJan 23Giving your healthcare info to a chatbot is, unsurprisingly, a terrible ideaAn hour agoThis coming-of-age adventure game made me feel a little too seenTwo hours agoGemini with Personal Intelligence is awfully familiarThe VergeThe Verge logo.FacebookThreadsInstagramYoutubeRSSContactTip UsCommunity GuidelinesArchivesAboutEthics StatementHow We Rate and Review ProductsCookie SettingsTerms of UsePrivacy NoticeCookie PolicyLicensing FAQAccessibilityPlatform Status© 2026 Vox Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved

The rise of AI-generated commercial content is poised to dramatically reshape the advertising landscape by 2026, driven largely by the demonstrable efficiency and cost-effectiveness of generative AI tools. Jess Weatherbed, a news writer specializing in creative industries and internet culture, has chronicled this shift, noting the increasing adoption of AI in campaigns by brands like Coca-Cola, Nestlé, and Mondelez, alongside tech giants Google and Microsoft. These brands are leveraging AI models like Veo 3 to produce advertisements in a fraction of the time and cost previously required, as evidenced by a Kalshi ad that cost only $2,000 to create.

However, this trend isn’t without its complexities and anxieties. While AI offers compelling benefits – scalability, reduced production costs, and faster campaign execution – it also raises significant questions about creativity, authenticity, and consumer perception. Initial tests, conducted by Kantar, revealed a surprising lack of discernible AI generation in ads from Coca-Cola’s AI holiday campaign, despite noticeable visual anomalies. This suggests that consumers, particularly the brand’s target audience, were largely unaffected by the artificial nature of the content.

Despite this initial success, a growing number of consumers reacted negatively to AI-generated advertising, citing concerns about “uncanny valley” effects, the potential for disingenuous messaging, and broader ethical considerations surrounding AI’s role in branding. This sentiment is reflected in online communities like the r/AiSlopAds subreddit, where users actively critique and expose examples of AI-generated ads. The primary reasons driving this distrust include anxieties about cost-cutting measures, perceived lack of creativity, and a general feeling that AI content lacks the genuine connection and emotional resonance associated with human-created advertising.

The tech industry is responding to these concerns, albeit with a pragmatic approach. Companies are recognizing the importance of maintaining consumer trust and have begun to implement strategies for more subtle and effective AI integration. This includes a shift towards “undetectable” AI – producing content that mimics human creativity while carefully avoiding obvious indicators of artificial generation. The success of brands like Polaroid, which deliberately embraced “imperfection” and analog production methods, demonstrates an awareness of the power of authentic human touch.

Furthermore, a counter-movement is emerging, with brands like ABM BBDO and Wieden and Kennedy actively incorporating AI into their production pipelines while maintaining a focus on human creativity. This strategic approach acknowledges the power of AI as a tool, rather than a replacement for human ingenuity. The most memorable commercials of all time – such as the Budweiser "WASSUUUUUP" campaign and Ridley Scott’s 1984 Apple Macintosh commercial – exemplify the enduring appeal of human-created content that prioritizes genuine emotion, relatable storytelling, and memorable moments.

By 2026, the advertising industry is bracing for an era defined by a delicate balance: the strategic deployment of AI to maximize efficiency, while simultaneously safeguarding the crucial role of human creativity and authentic connection. Brands are investing in technologies that allow them to produce campaigns with greater speed and agility, while also remembering that true brand loyalty is built on trust, resonance, and a refusal to sacrifice genuine human storytelling for the sake of cost or convenience. The future of advertising, as Jess Weatherbed observes, will hinge on a clever ability to distinguish between the tools of generation and the enduring strength of human expression.