No One Is Quite Sure Why Ice Is Slippery | WIREDSkip to main contentMenuSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuAccountAccountNewslettersSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoMerchSearchSearchSign InSign InPaulina RowińskaScienceJan 25, 2026 7:00 AMNo One Is Quite Sure Why Ice Is SlipperyA thin, watery layer coating the surface of ice is what makes it slick. Despite a great deal of theorizing over the centuries, though, it isn’t entirely clear why that layer forms.Play/Pause ButtonPauseCourtesy of Marcus Lindstrom/QuantaSave StorySave this storySave StorySave this storyThe original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine.The reason we can gracefully glide on an ice-skating rink or clumsily slip on an icy sidewalk is that the surface of ice is coated by a thin watery layer. Scientists generally agree that this lubricating, liquidlike layer is what makes ice slippery. They disagree, though, about why the layer forms.Three main theories about the phenomenon have been debated over the past two centuries. Last year, researchers in Germany put forward a fourth hypothesis that they say solves the puzzle.But does it? A consensus feels nearer but has yet to be reached. For now, the slippery problem remains open.Hypothesis 1: PressureIn the mid-1800s, an English engineer named James Thomson suggested that when we step on ice, the pressure we exert melts its surface, making it slippery. Under normal conditions, ice melts when the temperature rises to 0 degrees Celsius (32 degrees Fahrenheit). But pressure lowers its melting point, so that even at lower temperatures, a layer of water might form on the surface. This theoretical relationship between melting point and pressure was experimentally confirmed by Thomson’s younger brother William, better known as Lord Kelvin.In the 1930s, though, Frank P. Bowden and T. P. Hughes of the Laboratory of Physical Chemistry at the University of Cambridge cast doubt on the pressure melting theory. They calculated that an average skier exerts way too little pressure to significantly alter ice’s melting point. To do so, the skier would have to weigh thousands of kilograms.Hypothesis 2: FrictionBowden and Hughes suggested an alternative explanation for the formation of the water layer: that it melts because of heat generated by friction caused by whatever is sliding against it.They tested their theory in an artificial ice cave in the Swiss Alps, using a complex contraption to measure the friction between ice and other materials. They found that the friction was higher with materials that are good at conducting heat, such as brass, than with poor conductors like ebonite. From this, they concluded that when ice is rubbed by a material that easily absorbs heat, less heat is available to melt the ice, making it less slippery. This supported their theory that frictional melting is responsible for ice’s slipperiness.Although this explanation still appears in textbooks, many scientists disagree with it. “The problem with that is you only melt the ice behind you, not the ice you are actually skating on,” said Daniel Bonn, a physicist at the University of Amsterdam. Ice can be slippery the moment we step on it, before any motion has occurred that could cause frictional heating.Daniel Bonn’s group at the University of Amsterdam created a microscopic ice-skating rink to investigate the slipperiness question.
Courtesy of Daniel BonnTo test the friction hypothesis, Bonn and his team created a microscopic ice-skating rink. They rotated a piece of metal (standing in for the blade of a skate) at different speeds, each time measuring the force required to move the metal and the force that the metal exerted on the ice. The ratio of these forces gave them a measure of the ice’s slipperiness. The scientists found that the slipperiness did not depend on the speed, suggesting that frictional heating—which should increase with speed—isn’t what makes ice slippery.Hypothesis 3: PremeltingThere’s another possibility: that ice’s surface is wet even before anything makes contact with it.In 1842, the English scientist Michael Faraday observed that two touching ice cubes will freeze to each other, and even a warm hand will stick to ice. He attributed this phenomenon to a thin, premelted layer that sits on ice’s exposed surface, and that freezes again when covered up. Faraday couldn’t explain why it happens, and it took almost a century for other scientists—notably Charles Gurney and Woldemar Weyl—to propose why “surface premelting” might occur.They intuited that molecules near the surface behave differently from those deep within the ice. Ice is a crystal, which means each water molecule is locked into a periodic lattice. However, at the surface, the water molecules have fewer neighbors to bond with and therefore have more freedom of movement than in solid ice. In that so-called premelted layer, molecules are easily displaced by a skate, a ski or a shoe.Today, scientists generally agree that the premelted layer exists, at least close to the melting point, but they disagree on its role in ice’s slipperiness.A few years ago, Luis MacDowell, a physicist at the Complutense University of Madrid, and his collaborators ran a series of simulations to establish which of the three hypotheses—pressure, friction or premelting—best explains the slipperiness of ice. “In computer simulations, you can see the atoms move,” he said—something that isn’t feasible in real experiments. “And you can actually look at the neighbors of those atoms” to see whether they are periodically spaced, like in a solid, or disordered, like in a liquid.They observed that their simulated block of ice was indeed coated with a liquidlike layer just a few molecules thick, as the premelting theory predicts. When they simulated a heavy object sliding on the ice’s surface, the layer thickened, in agreement with the pressure theory. Finally, they explored frictional heating. Near ice’s melting point, the premelted layer was already thick, so frictional heating didn’t significantly impact it. At lower temperatures, however, the sliding object produced heat that melted the ice and thickened the layer.“Our message is: All three controversial hypotheses operate simultaneously to one or the other degree,” MacDowell said.Hypothesis 4: AmorphizationOr perhaps the melting of the surface isn’t the main cause of ice’s slipperiness.Recently, a team of researchers at Saarland University in Germany identified arguments against all three prevailing theories. First, for pressure to be high enough to melt ice’s surface, the area of contact between (say) skis and ice would have to be “unreasonably small,” they wrote. Second, for a ski moving at a realistic speed, experiments show that the amount of heat generated by friction is insufficient to cause melting. Third, they found that in extremely cold temperatures, ice is still slippery even though there’s no premelted layer. (Surface molecules still have a dearth of neighbors, but at low temperatures they don’t have enough energy to overcome the strong bonds with solid ice molecules.) “So either the slipperiness of ice is coming from a combination of all of them or a few of them, or there is something else that we don’t know yet,” said Achraf Atila, a materials scientist on the team.Materials scientists at Saarland University in Germany showed in computer simulations that as two blocks of ice slide against each other, an amorphous layer in the middle gradually thickens.
Courtesy of Saarland UniversityThe scientists looked for alternative explanations in research on other substances, such as diamonds. Gemstone polishers have long known from experience that some sides of a diamond are easier to polish, or “softer,” than others. In 2011, another German research group published a paper explaining this phenomenon. They created computer simulations of two diamonds sliding against each other. Atoms on the surface were mechanically pulled out of their bonds, which allowed them to move, form new bonds, and so on. This sliding formed a structureless, “amorphous” layer. In contrast to the crystal nature of the diamond, this layer is disordered and behaves more like a liquid than a solid. This amorphization effect depends on the orientation of molecules at the surface, so some sides of a crystal are softer than others.Atila and his colleagues argue that a similar mechanism happens in ice. They simulated ice surfaces sliding against each other, keeping the temperature of the simulated system low enough to ensure the absence of melting. (Any slipperiness would therefore have a different explanation.) Initially, the surfaces attracted each other, much like magnets. This was because water molecules are dipoles, with uneven concentrations of positive and negative charge. The positive end of one molecule attracts the negative end of another. The attraction in the ice created tiny welds between the sliding surfaces. As the surfaces slid past each other, the welds broke apart and new ones formed, gradually changing the ice’s structure.The scientists repeated the simulations, replacing one of the ice surfaces with other materials that are either attracted or repelled by water. Again, molecules on the surface of the ice were displaced with sliding, but more so when the other substance attracted the ice.In another simulation by the German team, a more realistic, rough surface slides across the ice, displacing surface molecules.
Courtesy of Saarland UniversityThe simulations indicated that sliding mechanically destroys the ordered crystal lattice of ice, creating an amorphous layer that thickens as the sliding goes on. The team says that this, rather than melting, explains ice’s slipperiness—especially at low temperatures.A Consensus Kept on IceMacDowell trusts the results from Atila and collaborators, although he thinks amorphization occurs only at high sliding speeds (the authors disagree, but simulating low sliding speeds requires a prohibitive amount of computational power).Bonn also supports the new explanation, which he says aligns with experimental studies of objects sliding on ice conducted by his group in 2021. Those experiments and the new simulations both suggest that ice is slippery because of structural changes in its surface, though the researchers characterize what’s happening in different terms. Atila believes that the changes are driven by the mechanical displacement of water molecules, whereas Bonn focuses on how mobile the surface molecules are to begin with. He compares the surface to a floor filled with little balls: “Because they’re so mobile, it’s impossible to stay upright if you’re in such a room. Just as it’s very difficult to stay upright when you’re on ice.”The difference between their descriptions “is a semantic issue,” according to Bonn, but Atila’s coauthor Sergey Sukhomlinov disagrees. “I believe these are different mechanisms, even though they may look similar,” he said.We’re surely getting closer to settling the seemingly simple, centuries-old question of why ice is slippery. At this point, the lack of a shared vocabulary among researchers might be one of the biggest hindrances to resolving the issue. Similar effects might get different names, suggesting different hypotheses. Bonn also blames the fact that “ice researchers do have different and contradictory opinions, but they don’t really tell each other that they disagree with each other.Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.You Might Also LikeIn your inbox: WIRED's most ambitious, future-defining storiesDoes the “war on protein” exist?Big Story: China’s renewable energy revolution might save the worldThe race to build the DeepSeek of Europe is onWatch our livestream replay: Welcome to the Chinese centuryPaulina Rowińska is a science writer with a PhD in mathematics from Imperial College London. Before joining Quanta Magazine as a science writing fellow, she was an editorial intern at Undark Magazine, completed a graduate degree in science writing at MIT, and created educational content for Brilliant. She's the author ... Read MoreContributorTopicsQuanta Magazinematerials scienceweatherwaterRead MoreBehold the Manifold, the Concept that Changed How Mathematicians View SpaceIn the mid-19th century, Bernhard Riemann conceived of a new way to think about mathematical spaces, providing the foundation for modern geometry and physics.A New Bridge Links the Strange Math of Infinity to Computer ScienceDescriptive set theorists study the niche mathematics of infinity. Now, they’ve shown that their problems can be rewritten in the concrete language of algorithms.People Who Drink Bottled Water on a Daily Basis Ingest 90,000 More Microplastic Particles Each YearDrinking water in plastic bottles contains countless particles too small to see. New research finds that people who drink water from them on a daily basis ingest far more microplastics than those who don’t.The Environmental and Human Rights Costs of China’s Clean Energy Investments AbroadChinese companies have pledged hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy manufacturing investments overseas, but the projects are having significant social, environmental, and human rights impacts.The Oceans Just Keep Getting HotterFor the eighth year in a row, the world’s oceans absorbed a record-breaking amount of heat in 2025. It was equivalent to the energy it would take to boil 2 billion Olympic swimming pools.Meta Is Making a Big Bet on Nuclear With OkloMeta will finance Oklo’s purchase of uranium for its reactors. It’s a massive vote of confidence for both the startup and nuclear power, but challenges remain.A Fitbit for Your Feet, Free With Factor Meal Delivery ServiceFactor meal delivery service offers a free $200 Withings body-scanning scale after a three-week subscription. I was afraid, then maybe a little motivated?What Is VO2 Max and Why Is It Important for Longevity?VO2 max can predict cardiorespiratory health and longevity, but only if you understand what the number can and can’t tell you.The 3 Keys to Understanding Trump’s Retro Coup in VenezuelaThis weekend’s invasion was both a throwback to the last century and a new, uniquely Trumpian nightmare—one that’s just beginning.Poor Sleep Quality Accelerates Brain AgingResearch shows that people who sleep poorly tend to have brain age that is older than their actual age. Chronic inflammation in the body caused by poor sleep likely plays a part.Crispr Pioneer Launches Startup to Make Tailored Gene-Editing TreatmentsAurora Therapeutics, cofounded by Nobel Prize–winning scientist Jennifer Doudna, plans to use gene editing and a new FDA regulatory pathway to commercialize treatments for rare diseases.How to Start (and Keep) a Healthy HabitWhether you want to run a marathon or learn to play the guitar, here’s how to set yourself up for success.WIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.SubscribeNewslettersTravelFAQWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesWearablesCouponsGift GuidesAdvertiseContact UsManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

The slippery nature of ice has puzzled scientists for centuries, and despite considerable theorizing, a definitive explanation remains elusive. This summary will delve into the prominent hypotheses surrounding ice’s slipperiness, examining the evidence and counterarguments that have shaped our understanding.

Initially, James Thomson, an English engineer in the mid-1800s, proposed that pressure from a skater’s blade could lower ice’s melting point, explaining the slippery sensation. His brother, William Kelvin (Lord Kelvin), experimentally confirmed this relationship between pressure and melting point. However, Frank P. Bowden and T. P. Hughes of the Laboratory of Physical Chemistry at the University of Cambridge challenged this theory in the 1930s. Their calculations revealed that the average skier exerts insufficient pressure to significantly alter ice’s melting point, requiring an extraordinarily large contact area – thousands of kilograms – to achieve a measurable effect. Thus, the pressure theory was largely dismissed, though it remains a historically significant starting point.

Another prominent theory, the frictional melting hypothesis, suggested that heat generated by friction between the skate and the ice was responsible for the melting process. Bowden and Hughes tested this by conducting experiments in an artificial ice cave, measuring friction between materials. They discovered that materials with high thermal conductivity, such as brass, produced more friction than materials like ebonite. This led them to conclude that frictional heat diminished the ice’s resistance to melting. Despite its continued appearance in textbooks, many, including Daniel Bonn at the University of Amsterdam, criticize this theory, noting that the melting primarily occurs *behind* the skater, not directly where the skate is applying force. Bonn’s group reinforced this view through micro-scale ice-skating experiments. These experiments using a microscopic ice-skating rink eliminated the possibility of frictional heating as the source of slipperiness.

A third hypothesis, premelting, posits that a thin, watery layer already exists on the surface of ice before contact occurs. Michael Faraday observed this phenomenon in 1842, noting that touching ice cubes or a warm hand glued to ice is due to this pre-existing layer. This layer freezes over when covered, but its presence explains the initial slipperiness, independent of frictional heating or pressure effects. Notably, Charles Gurney and Woldemar Weyl later expanded on Faraday's observations. While generally accepted regarding its existence, particularly near the melting point, the extent to which it directly contributes to the overall slipperiness is debated.

Recently, a team at Saarland University in Germany, along with collaborators, offered a new perspective. They simulated ice surfaces sliding against each other, revealing that as two blocks of ice slide, an amorphous layer gradually thickens in the middle. This suggests that the primary cause of slipperiness isn't melting, but rather the mechanical disruption of the ice’s crystalline structure. The scientists identified the effects of this "amorphous" layer, along with the forces involved, as the key explanation. This hypothesis relies on simulating the behavior of ice at a molecular level, something previously impossible through direct experimentation. Luis MacDowell and collaborators' simulations provide a strong argument for the amorphization of the ice surface, offering a modern explanation for this enduring scientific mystery.

Ultimately, the current understanding suggests that the slipperiness of ice is likely a complex phenomenon driven by multiple interacting factors. The differing viewpoints amongst researchers, such as Bonn and Atila, highlight the challenges of completely resolving this longstanding scientific question. The emphasis on the amorphous layer, supported by recent simulations, provides a compelling framework, but the precise balance of forces and processes continues to be investigated.