The Download: why LLMs are like aliens, and the future of head transplants
Recorded: Jan. 27, 2026, noon
| Original | Summarized |
The Download: Why LLMs are like aliens, and the future of head transplants | MIT Technology Review You need to enable JavaScript to view this site. Skip to ContentMIT Technology ReviewFeaturedTopicsNewslettersEventsAudioMIT Technology ReviewFeaturedTopicsNewslettersEventsAudioThe DownloadThe Download: why LLMs are like aliens, and the future of head transplantsPlus: Big Tech is heading to court this week I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology. 1 Big Tech is facing multiple high-profile social media addiction lawsuits Meta, TikTok and YouTube will face parents’ accusations in court this week. (WP $)+ It’s the first time they’re defending against these claims before a jury in a court of law. (CNN)2 Power prices are surging in the world’s largest data center hubVirginia is struggling to meet record demand during a winter storm, partly because of the centers’ electricity demands. (Reuters)+ Why these kinds of violent storms are getting harder to forecast. (Vox)+ AI is changing the grid. Could it help more than it harms? (MIT Technology Review)3 TikTok has started collecting even more data on its usersIncluding precise information about their location. (Wired $)4 ICE-watching groups are successfully fighting DHS efforts to unmask themAn anonymous account holder sued to block ICE from identifying them—and won. (Ars Technica)5 A new wave of AI companies want to use AI to make AI betterThe AI ouroboros is never-ending. (NYT $)+ Is AI really capable of making bona fide scientific advancements? (Undark)+ AI trained on AI garbage spits out AI garbage. (MIT Technology Review) 6 Iran is testing a two-tier internetMeaning its current blackout could become permanent. (Rest of World)7 Don’t believe the humanoid robot hypeEven a leading robot maker admits that at best, they’re only half as efficient as humans. (FT $)+ Tesla wants to put its Optimus bipedal machine to work in its Austin factory. (Insider)+ Why the humanoid workforce is running late. (MIT Technology Review) 8 AI is changing how manufacturers create new productsIncluding thinner chewing gum containers and new body wash odors. (WSJ $)+ AI could make better beer. Here’s how. (MIT Technology Review)9 New Jersey has had enough of e-bikes 🚲But will other US states follow its lead? (The Verge)10 Sci-fi writers are cracking down on AIHuman-produced works only, please. (TechCrunch)+ San Diego Comic-Con was previously a safe space for AI-generated art. (404 Media)+ Generative AI is reshaping South Korea’s webcomics industry. (MIT Technology Review) Quote of the day “Choosing American digital technology by default is too easy and must stop.” —Nicolas Dufourcq, head of French state-owned investment bank Bpifrance, makes his case for why Big European companies should use European-made software as tensions with the US rise, the Wall Street Journal reports. |
The article explores the evolving relationship between humans and increasingly complex artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on Large Language Models (LLMs) and their growing complexity. Researchers are beginning to treat these AI models as if they were living organisms, much like xenomorphs from science fiction, attempting to understand their inner workings through a process called mechanistic interpretability. This approach seeks to unravel the “black box” of LLMs, revealing the underlying mechanisms that drive their outputs. A key aspect of this investigation is the disconcerting discovery that LLMs are, in fact, incredibly strange. Their behavior isn't easily predictable, and their internal logic remains largely opaque, even to those who build them. This realization highlights the significant challenges in assessing and controlling AI systems, particularly as their capabilities continue to expand. The article suggests that the current approach of simply scaling up AI models – increasing size and data – is reaching a point of diminishing returns and that a deeper understanding of how these systems truly operate is now critical. The use of mechanistic interpretability represents a shift towards a more biological, systematic approach to AI study. The article then pivots to examine the concept of “head transplants” spearheaded by neurosurgeon Sergio Canavero. Canavero’s audacious proposal, initially met with skepticism, has recently garnered renewed interest from life-extension enthusiasts and stealth Silicon Valley startups. Despite the lack of tangible progress and the inherent technical challenges, the idea of transferring a human brain to a new body is being re-evaluated, indicating a potential future direction for bioengineering and neuroscience. Beyond these specific examples, the article highlights broader trends in the technology landscape. There’s a growing awareness of the limitations of simply scaling AI, with a renewed focus on developing more interpretable and understandable models. Simultaneously, the “AI ouroboros” – the tendency for AI to be trained on AI-generated content, resulting in a feedback loop of increasingly flawed outputs – is a significant concern. This cycle amplifies existing biases and inaccuracies, demonstrating the need for careful oversight and robust evaluation methods. Furthermore, the piece touches upon anxieties surrounding artificial intelligence, with some observers – dubbed “doomers” – dubbing the current state of AI development a “code red,” suggesting imminent and catastrophic consequences. This reflects broader concerns about the potential societal impacts of advanced AI, fueling a trend of preparing for a potentially negative future. Finally, several tangential stories contribute to the overall theme. These include the rise of pneumatic tubes, which were once envisioned as a revolutionary transportation system but ultimately faded into obsolescence; the increasing use of e-bikes, leading to local regulations; the exploration of AI’s impact on webcomics; and the persistent challenges in manufacturing with AI. These diverse anecdotes illustrate the broader, interconnected nature of technological innovation and the disruptive potential of emerging technologies. The return of pneumatic tubes is a nostalgic reminder of past technological optimism and cautionary tale of unfulfilled promises. |