Beyond Programmatic: A New Model For Buying Premium CTV Inventory | AdExchanger
image/svg+xml:
Topics Latest Marketers Agencies Publishers Technology Platforms Identity Measurement Data Privacy Artificial Intelligence CTV Commerce AdExplainer Exclusive Report Daily News Roundup
Opinion All Columns Data-Driven Thinking On TV & Video The Sell Sider Content Studio Comic Contributor Guidelines
About Us Advertise Newsletter AdExchanger Advisory Board About Us Contact Us
Events Programmatic AI Las Vegas AdExchanger Awards Webinars All Events Network Events
Podcasts AdExchanger Talks The Big Story Inside the Stack
NEW! Programmatic AI 2026
Become an AdHero
Subscribe
Sign In
Sign In
Topics Latest Marketers Agencies Publishers Technology Platforms Identity Measurement Data Privacy Artificial Intelligence CTV Commerce AdExplainer Exclusive Report Daily News Roundup Opinion All Columns Data-Driven Thinking On TV & Video The Sell Sider Content Studio Comic Contributor Guidelines Events & Awards Programmatic AI Las Vegas AdExchanger Awards Webinars All Events Network Events Podcasts AdExchanger Talks The Big Story Inside the Stack Subscribe Free Sign Up About Us Advertise Newsletter AdExchanger Advisory Board About Us Contact Us CONNECT
Home Content Studio Beyond Programmatic: A New Model For Buying Premium CTV Inventory
AdExchanger Content Studio Beyond Programmatic: A New Model For Buying Premium CTV Inventory
Friday, March 20th, 2026 – 8:00 am SHARE:
Sponsored post by Philip Inghelbrecht CEO
Tatari
SPONSORED BY:
If you buy CTV advertising, you’ve likely encountered two approaches to securing premium inventory: programmatic guaranteed (PG) and buying direct, also referred to as direct IO (DIO). Both are effective in different ways, but each introduces structural limitations that force advertisers to compromise on cost, transparency or execution. With traditional DIO, buyers negotiate directly with publishers such as NBCUniversal, Tubi or Disney to secure inventory. Some refer to it as the “old school” way of buying TV, but DIO still offers several advantages over programmatic. Direct publisher connections mean ads run on verified, premium streaming apps. The bot traffic, device spoofing and counterfeit inventory that plague programmatic CTV simply don’t exist in a direct deal. Publishers tightly control the program and the ads that run alongside it, eliminating brand-safety risks. And because there is no intermediary DSP or SSP involved, advertisers avoid the programmatic fees that can extract 30% to 50% of spend.
DIO also provides greater placement transparency. Advertisers know exactly where their ad ran, against what content and how the campaign performed. It also unlocks access to premium inventory such as live sports, sponsorships and custom integrations. These advantages explain DIO’s resilience in the market. Today, we estimate that $8 billion of CTV inventory (out of approximately $30 billion) is still transacted this way by larger brands and agencies. Publishers also prefer direct deals because they know the brands, budgets and campaign goals involved. The main drawback of DIO is the lack of automation. Processing direct buys is labor intensive for publishers and prone to errors, which means DIO is typically available only to brands spending significant amounts on a campaign. Programmatic guaranteed attempts to solve that problem. It allows buyers to reserve CTV inventory in advance – similar to a traditional DIO deal – but executes it through programmatic infrastructure using a demand-side platform, such as The Trade Desk, DV360 or Amazon DSP. PG became popular not only because it automates the transaction but because it enables digital-style controls, such as buying audiences instead of specific programs and managing frequency across multiple publishers. Today, we estimate that $7 billion flows through PG pipes annually. However, the reason why programmatic guaranteed has not replaced DIO is tied directly to the benefits of DIO. When buying PG, advertisers are still transacting through programmatic infrastructure that introduces intermediary fees and reduces transparency. Introducing another CTV media buying option After years of operating in the CTV supply space, we realized that traditional SSP models had become too commoditized to drive real innovation or value. Believing that the future of the industry lies in direct media execution, we shifted our focus away from standard exchange tech to build a dedicated direct sales automation infrastructure. Upstream brings together the best of programmatic guaranteed and DIO, giving advertisers direct API integration into the publisher ad server. Because there is no DSP or SSP involved, there is no risk of fraud, no fees and access to more brand-safe inventory, while keeping all of the benefits of programmatic. Upstream functions as a parallel operating system alongside programmatic, enabling publishers to sell their most prized and highest quality inventory with better automation, speed and scale, without adding SSP fees. For brands, this unlocks access to high-quality inventory, massive reach and lower cost without the need to transact large amounts. Even smaller brands can buy premium impressions, such as an NFL playoff game, inventory that is often not available via programmatic pipes. The role of programmatic in the future Programmatic still has advantages when it comes to precise targeting, such as accessing niche audience segments or retargeting through CTV. For certain brands or certain parts of a campaign, this granularity makes up for the issues surrounding programmatic. But targeting is not an end goal; it is a means toward performance. For many brands, the future of CTV buying will be deciding when each approach makes the most sense. For more articles featuring Philip Inghelbrecht, click here.
Tagged in:
ad tech infrastructure
// connected TV
// CTV Advertising
// CTV media buying
// direct IO
// Philip Inghelbrecht
// premium inventory
// programmatic advertising
// programmatic guaranteed
// programmatic vs direct buying
// streaming advertising
// Tatari
Next In Content Studio
The End Of Easy Measurement: Building An Evidence-Based System For Marketing ROI
Related Stories
AdExchanger Content Studio Video Metadata Is Driving Advertising Success In CTV
AdExchanger Content Studio Why Programmatic CTV Isn’t Enough: Unlocking The Full Potential Of Your TV Ad Strategy
AdExchanger Content Studio Why Sports Is The Fastest Way To Break CTV’s Programmatic Ceiling
AdExchanger Content Studio The End Of The CPM Era: Why ‘Unlimited’ Is The Future For Ad Tech Partners
Must Read
Marketers The Rise Of Principal Media And The End Of The Agencies As We Knew Them
Ad agency holding companies are among the most adaptable businesses out there. In recent years holdcos like Publicis, WPP and Omnicom-IPG have stretched our notions of what an agency business even is exactly.
Artificial Intelligence How One Agency Startup Uses Real-Time Data To Develop Real-Time Ads
Audience preferences are constantly evolving. So why not ads that evolve in real time, too? No, really.
Marketers MyFitnessPal Wants To Start The Health And Wellness Subsector Of Retail Media
MyFitnessPal has just announced the launch of a data-driven advertising business that draws on its wealth of user-provided meal planning, fitness and nutrition data.
Measurement Smartly Is Planning To Acquire INCRMNTAL Within The Next Few Weeks
Smartly is acquiring INCRMNTAL, an incrementality measurement startup founded in Tel Aviv in 2019 that focuses on causal lift rather than user-level tracking.
Marketers Viant Had A Good Q4, But Still Needs To Punch Up At Bigger Platforms
Viant reported its Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings on Wednesday evening and investors appeared pleased.
AI The Boring Infrastructure That Could Make Agentic AI Happen For Ad Tech
AI agents are moving fast, but MadConnect says ad tech’s slow, messy plumbing still needs an overhaul before agentic marketing can really work.
Popular
Marketers The Rise Of Principal Media And The End Of The Agencies As We Knew Them
Ad agency holding companies are among the most adaptable businesses out there. In recent years holdcos like Publicis, WPP and Omnicom-IPG have stretched our notions of what an agency business even is exactly.
Measurement Smartly Is Planning To Acquire INCRMNTAL Within The Next Few Weeks
Smartly is acquiring INCRMNTAL, an incrementality measurement startup founded in Tel Aviv in 2019 that focuses on causal lift rather than user-level tracking.
PODCAST: The Big Story Will The Trade Desk Right-Size Its Margins?
Fees, fees, fees. The Trade Desk is facing market pressure in all directions: from rival DSPs offering lower fee structures, SSPs and agencies clashing over its OpenPath product and bearish investors disappointed with growth. Guest Sarah Caputo, founder of consultancy Fraction Method, tells us why The Trade Desk should reduce its margin and make its fees more transparent.
AdExplainer What Does A Beta Test Of A Sell-Side Agent Look Like?
Now, publishers are exploring automation and optimization through agentic AI. Many publishers have identified a similar use case: sales agents who actively make decisions in the auction on behalf of the publisher.
Publishers Future Is Training Its AI On Publisher First-Party Data
Future’s new Helix ad optimization solution adds AI-powered data science and predictive modeling to its in-house audience platform.
Join the AdExchanger Community Join Now
Your trusted source for in-depth programmatic news, views, education and events. AdExchanger is where marketers, agencies, publishers and tech companies go for the latest information on the trends that are transforming digital media and marketing, from data, privacy, identity and AI to commerce, CTV, measurement and mobile.
NEXT EVENT Programmatic AI May 18-20, 2026Park MGM, Las Vegas Learn More
ABOUT ADEXCHANGER About Us Advertise Contact Us Events Subscribe RSS Cookie Settings Privacy & Terms Accessibility Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
CONNECT
© 2026 Access Intelligence, LLC - All Rights Reserved |
Philip Inghelbrecht, CEO of Tatari, outlines a new model for buying premium CTV inventory, dubbed “Upstream,” which seeks to bridge the perceived limitations of both traditional programmatic guaranteed (PG) and direct-to-publisher buys. The core of Inghelbrecht’s argument centers around the inefficiencies and compromises inherent in the current programmatic CTV landscape, dominated by intermediary fees and reduced transparency. He posits that the existing SSP models have become too commoditized, failing to deliver genuine innovation or value to advertisers and publishers alike.
Historically, advertisers have relied on two primary approaches: direct, or “old school,” buys through channels like NBCUniversal and Tubi (referred to as direct IO), and programmatic guaranteed (PG). DIO offers advantages such as verified premium inventory, brand safety control, and a lack of intermediary fees (typically 30-50% of spend). It also provides greater placement transparency and unlocks access to high-value inventory like live sports and sponsorships. However, DIO’s reliance on manual processes and significant labor costs limits its accessibility to larger brands with substantial budgets.
Programmatic guaranteed (PG) emerged as an attempt to automate the DIO process, leveraging DSPs like The Trade Desk or DV360 to facilitate reservations and audience targeting. While PG offers automation and digital-style controls, it still operates through programmatic infrastructure, resulting in continued intermediary fees and diminished transparency compared to DIO. Inghelbrecht estimates that $8 billion annually flows through PG channels, highlighting its market share.
Tatari’s “Upstream” solution aims to overcome these shortcomings by establishing a direct API integration between publishers and advertisers. This parallel operating system functions alongside existing programmatic infrastructure, eliminating intermediaries and associated fees, while simultaneously boosting automation and scale. Upstream allows brands to access high-quality inventory, achieve significant reach, and reduce costs, even for inventory previously inaccessible through programmatic routes, such as NFL playoff games.
Despite the continued benefits of DIO, Inghelbrecht acknowledges the strengths of programmatic in targeted audience reach and retargeting. However, he contends that targeting itself is merely a means to achieve performance goals, rather than an end in itself. The future of CTV buying, according to Inghelbrecht, will likely involve a strategic combination of these approaches, adapting to the specific needs of each campaign and brand. He believes the core differentiator moving forward will be the ability to seamlessly navigate between these models to optimize for cost, transparency and impact. |