Pompeii's battle scars linked to an ancient 'machine gun'
Recorded: March 24, 2026, 2:23 a.m.
| Original | Summarized |
Pompeii's battle scars linked to an ancient 'machine gun' Topics Week's top Latest news Unread news Subscribe Science X Account Sign In Sign in with Forget Password? Not a member? Learn more Nanotechnology Physics Earth Astronomy & Space Chemistry Biology Other Sciences Medicine Technology share this! Share Tweet Share Home Other Sciences Archaeology March 19, 2026 Pompeii's battle scars linked to an ancient 'machine gun' by Paul Arnold, Phys.org edited by Editors' notes This article has been reviewed according to Science X's fact-checked trusted source proofread The GIST Add as preferred source Location of the study area: (A) location of Pompeii within the Italian Peninsula; (B) satellite view of the area (Google Earth Pro 7.3.6.10441); (C) SIT orthoimage of the Pompeii Archaeological Park, with the city walls between the northern gates highlighted; (D) detail of the aerial image showing the wall circuit (Google Maps 2025); (E) view of the extrados of the northern wall towards Tower X (photo by S.B., December 2023). Credit: Heritage (2026). DOI: 10.3390/heritage9030096 The ancient city of Pompeii is one of those archaeological sites that keeps on giving with one discovery after another. While much of what we know about the Roman settlement comes from the eruption of Vesuvius in AD 79, another significant event from nearly a century earlier is also yielding fresh insights into its past. Ancient 'machine gun' Comparison between a photo from the beginning of the 20th century (on the left, (A) photo by Van Buren, ca. 1925) [8] (Plate 60.1: Marks of the Sullan bombardment, Pompeii) and a current photo (on the right, (B) photo by S.B., September 2024), highlighting some circular ballistic marks. The measuring rod leaning against the wall, visible in the historical photograph (A), can be estimated at approximately 3 m in length based on comparison with the current survey and masonry dimensions, given that the wall height in this section is approximately 4.5 m. Credit: Heritage (2026). DOI: 10.3390/heritage9030096 Ballistic scars Another supporting line of evidence came from museum collections. Surviving projectiles from other Roman military sites, such as iron-tipped bolts associated with the Scorpion catapult, matched the dimensions of the 3D models created from the wall damage. Scale comparison of two detailed textured mesh models: on the left, (A) ballistic impact of a spherical stone projectile; on the right, (B) fan-shaped groups of smaller quadrangular impacts. Survey, 3D models, and rendering by S.B. Credit: Heritage (2026). DOI: 10.3390/heritage9030096 "The unequivocally radial configuration of the closely spaced impacts observed at Pompeii... makes it reasonable to hypothesize the use of an automatic scorpion intended to strike archers emerging in succession from the lateral posterns of the towers or, higher up, defenders who briefly exposed themselves between the merlons once the provisional wooden parapets had been severely compromised," wrote the team in their paper. Written for you by our author Paul Arnold, edited by Gaby Clark, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive. More information © 2026 Science X Network Citation: This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no 386 shares Feedback to editors Trending Featured Last Comments Dishwashing with side effects: Kitchen sponges release microplastics Mar 21, 2026 2 Are humans naturally violent? New research challenges long-held assumptions Mar 21, 2026 3 English history's biggest march is a myth—King Harold sailed to the Battle of Hastings Mar 20, 2026 0 Pike eat more as water warms, threatening native species Mar 22, 2026 0 Kimchi-derived probiotic found to promote binding and excretion of intestinal nanoplastics Mar 21, 2026 0 2 hours ago 3 hours ago 3 hours ago 3 hours ago 3 hours ago 4 hours ago 4 hours ago 4 hours ago 4 hours ago 4 hours ago Relevant PhysicsForums posts Mag 6.4, Triple Point -Juan de Fuca (Gorda), N America, Pacific Plates Mar 21, 2026 The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones Mar 19, 2026 Cool weather experience - echos off clouds Mar 12, 2026 Another Kīlauea Eruption seems to be beginning Mar 11, 2026 Iceberg A-23A turns blue, starts traveling and may break apart Mar 6, 2026 Mag 4.1 Earthquake here in S. Ontario Jan 28, 2026 More from Earth Sciences Related Stories Recommended for you 3 hours ago 10 hours ago Mar 22, 2026 Mar 21, 2026 Mar 20, 2026 Mar 19, 2026 Load comments (0) Get Instant Summarized Text (Gist) This summary was automatically generated using LLM. Let us know if there is a problem with our content Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. -- please select one -- Your message to the editors Your email (optional, only if you'd like a response) Send Feedback Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors. E-mail the story Your friend's email Your email I would like to subscribe to Science X Newsletter. Learn more Your name Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. Your message Send Newsletter sign up Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. Subscribe More information Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience We keep our content available to everyone. Remove ads Maybe later Medical Xpress Tech Xplore Science X Newsletters Subscribe Science X Daily and the Weekly Email Newsletter are free features that allow you to receive your favorite sci-tech news updates in your email inbox Follow us Top Home Search Mobile version Help FAQ About Contact Support us Science X Account Archive News wire Android app iOS app RSS feeds Push notification © Phys.org 2003 - 2026 powered by Science X Network Privacy policy E-mail newsletter Subscribe Follow us |
The research presented in the “Pompeii’s battle scars linked to an ancient ‘machine gun’ ” article, conducted by a team of Italian researchers, challenges conventional understandings of the Siege of Sulla’s attack on Pompeii. The study proposes that the distinctive, fan-shaped holes observed in the city’s northern walls were not the result of standard Roman catapults launching large stone balls, but rather the impact marks of a sophisticated weapon known as a polybolus. This ancient ‘machine gun’ design was capable of firing multiple projectiles in rapid succession. The investigation utilized advanced techniques like laser scanning and photogrammetry to create detailed 3D models of the wall damage. By meticulously analyzing the depth, width, and shape of these impacts, the researchers were able to deduce the characteristics of the weapon used. Crucially, they compared the data to 3rd century BC Greek engineering blueprints which described the mechanics of a repeating catapult, further corroborating their interpretation. Furthermore, surviving projectile fragments from other Roman military sites, specifically iron-tipped bolts associated with the Scorpion catapult, matched the dimensions recovered from the Pompeii damage. This layering of evidence, incorporating both analysis and comparative references, strengthens the central argument. The team’s attribution of the damage to a polybolus has significant implications. It suggests a level of military technology and sophistication among the Romans that was previously underestimated, and it connects this advanced weaponry directly to the siege event itself. The researchers were able to link this damage to the actions of Lucius Cornelius Sulla by noting that the city was buried by volcanic ash less than a century after the military action, ensuring the preservation of the damage patterns. The study’s findings demonstrate a nuanced interpretation of archaeological evidence, highlighting the potential for technological advancements to be concealed within seemingly conventional warfare strategies. This work provides a compelling argument for re-evaluating the weaponry used during the Roman period, moving beyond a solely linear understanding of technological progression. |