Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads

Recorded: March 24, 2026, 7 a.m.

Original

Summarized

Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads | AdExchanger

image/svg+xml:

Topics
Latest
Marketers
Agencies
Publishers
Technology
Platforms
Identity
Measurement
Data Privacy
Artificial Intelligence
CTV
Commerce
AdExplainer
Exclusive Report
Daily News Roundup

Opinion
All Columns
Data-Driven Thinking
On TV & Video
The Sell Sider
Content Studio
Comic
Contributor Guidelines

About Us
Advertise
Newsletter
AdExchanger Advisory Board
About Us
Contact Us

Events
Programmatic AI Las Vegas
AdExchanger Awards
Webinars
All Events
Network Events

Podcasts
AdExchanger Talks
The Big Story
Inside the Stack

NEW! Programmatic AI 2026

Become an AdHero

Topics
Latest
Marketers
Agencies
Publishers
Technology
Platforms
Identity
Measurement
Data Privacy
Artificial Intelligence
CTV
Commerce
AdExplainer
Exclusive Report
Daily News Roundup

Opinion
All Columns
Data-Driven Thinking
On TV & Video
The Sell Sider
Content Studio
Comic
Contributor Guidelines

Events & Awards
Programmatic AI Las Vegas
AdExchanger Awards
Webinars
All Events
Network Events

Podcasts
AdExchanger Talks
The Big Story
Inside the Stack

Subscribe Free
Sign Up

About Us
Advertise
Newsletter
AdExchanger Advisory Board
About Us
Contact Us

CONNECT

Home Platforms Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads

Platforms
Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads By Anthony Vargas

Tuesday, March 24th, 2026 – 12:45 am
SHARE:

An interview with
Jean-Paul Schmetz
Chief of Ads

Perhaps nothing can stay ad-free forever.
Brave launched in 2016 as an open-source, ad-blocking, privacy-forward web browser to compete with Google’s Chrome.
But in 2019, soon after Brave exited beta, it began introducing opt-in, rewarded ad experiences. Two years later, after acquiring search platform Tailcat (formerly Cliqz), Brave rolled out its own search advertising experience.
Since then, Brave also added takeover display ads when users open new tabs, plus limited pop-up notifications.
Fact is, a browser without a search engine – and search ads – just doesn’t make any sense, according to Brave’s ad chief Jean-Paul Schmetz, who also serves as CEO of Ghostery, an ad-blocking browser extension. (He helped build the Tailcat tech that now underpins Brave’s search engine, too.)

“I’ve always been fascinated by this idea that if people tell you what they want, and you give it to them, it kind of works,” he said, “versus the more interest-based advertising where you’re trying to change people’s minds.”
But one thing that hasn’t changed, Schmetz emphasized, is Brave’s stance on ad tracking. “It’s not programmatic,” he said of Brave’s approach. “It’s not trying to figure out that you were looking at gloves on Amazon 10 minutes ago, so I’ll give you an ad for gloves.”
Schmetz spoke with AdExchanger about competition in the search and browser markets, the fallout from the Google Search antitrust ruling and whether AI search will help smaller upstarts compete with Big Tech.
AdExchanger: Brave doesn’t share user data with third parties, so how do you target your ads?
JEAN-PAUL SCHMETZ: By the query itself and the user’s country. Nothing else plays a role. If you type “buy lipstick,” I don’t care if you’re a man or woman, I’ll give you a lipstick ad. If you want to go to Amsterdam, I don’t care if you’re rich or poor, we give you all the hotels.
For our new tab takeover display ads, there’s no targeting except the country.
What’s Brave’s philosophy on cookies and alternative IDs?
We never use third-party cookies and we don’t track any ad IDs.
The browser can remember ad exposures. It can tell if you click on a search ad and whether, 30 days later, you visit the “thank you” page. We have a sync feature [that enables this], but the data is encrypted from us.
Brave never blocks first-party cookies.
Do you have any optimism that Google will ever have to divest its Chrome browser?
Not at all.
How should regulators promote competition in the search market following Judge Amit Mehta’s ruling last year that Google operates a search monopoly?
I’m not sure what a Chrome divestiture would achieve. The main remedy would be to stop Google from paying browsers to force people to use Google search – and the court did not say Google can’t do that.
What I recommended to the Department of Justice, but they didn’t push for, is that Google should pay any browser that brings them traffic [regardless of whether there’s a search licensing deal]. Then, even Brave users who use Google Search would have value to us.
Why should Firefox get $400 million a year from Google and we get nothing? Google would be a lot less powerful of a monopoly if it had to spread money around without the condition of “only if you don’t compete with us.”
Besides, if Google were forced to divest Chrome, then Chrome would go bankrupt within 10 minutes. There’s no way to monetize a browser unless you have your own search engine or a search deal.
Judge Mehta ruled that Google has to renegotiate exclusive search deals annually and share search data with competitors. Will those remedies have any impact?
This is being appealed, and it’s going to take a while.
But if Apple is getting $20 billion a year, it’ll renew every year. Apple isn’t suddenly going to say, “I won’t take the $20 billion this year because I want to live dangerously.”
On data sharing, Google asked the judge to stay the remedy so that it’s not implemented until after the appeal.
Has the rise of generative AI search changed competition in the browser or search markets?
Not yet. When people have a question, they look for the first search box that’s able to answer that question in the browser.
AI search has made it harder for publishers to get organic search traffic. Do publishers buy your search ads?
It’s too expensive. Search advertising has never been a workable path for publishers, because you end up paying, like, $1 per click and monetize at a $5 CPM.
Typically, they’ve gone the SEO route, which works at Brave the same way it works at Google – as in, I would say, less and less. The flywheel we’ve had for the last 20 years has been basically dismantled, whether by AI or other things.
What advice do you have for publishers?
I have 30 years in publishing [including as chief data scientist for German media and tech conglomerate Hubert Burda Media dating back to the mid-‘90s], so I’m quite sympathetic to publishers.
If the summary of your content is as good as your content, you have a problem. You have to create content that needs to be experienced. That’s why video, podcasts and original content are working so well compared to more traditional publishing.
What was your reaction to OpenAI introducing ads?
It’s logical. If people tell you what they want to buy, you should give them ads, because it’s hard to answer commercial intent only with organic content.
For example, StubHub only advertises if they have seats for sale. But organic search can’t index these things very well. If you click on a search link for an event and there are no seats left available, it’s frustrating, whereas the ad is actually quite helpful.
But what OpenAI is doing isn’t real search advertising. It’s just sponsored queries.
Are we in an AI bubble and will all AI search companies eventually need advertising to be sustainable?
Yeah, but I don’t know why a bubble would be bad for users.
There’s precedent for this. In the late ‘90s, people were laying fiberoptic cable for broadband internet. Some investors lost money because they invested too much or too early, and some companies like WorldCom went bankrupt. But the broadband infrastructure was there when we needed it.
If the AI bubble collapses, you might have a recession. The stock market and portfolios will suffer. But it doesn’t go back to the way it was before.
And if you want advertising to save your butt when the going gets rough, that’s hopeless. I was part of that first internet bubble, and when the shit hit the fan, advertising really hit the fan. Advertisers will panic before anyone else.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
For more articles featuring Jean-Paul Schmetz, click here.

Tagged in:

amazon

//
apple

//
Brave

//
Cliqz

//
featured

//
Firefox

//
generative AI search

//
Ghostery

//
Google Chrome

//
Google Search antitrust trial

//
Hubert Burda Media

//
Jean-Paul Schmetz

//
OpenAI

//
search advertising

//
StubHub

//
Tailcat

Next In Platforms

Google Is Pitching Buyers On Gemini And YouTube Creators At The NewFronts

Related Stories

Google antitrust
Judge Mehta’s Remedies For Google’s Search Monopoly Won’t Cure What Ails Publishers

Daily News Roundup
The Futile Search For Google Search Remedies; Agents Of Change

Daily News Roundup
Breaking Up Google is Hard To Do; Eyes On Epsilon

Platforms
Reddit’s Full-Funnel Play Nets 74% Ad Revenue Growth

Must Read

Newfronts 2026
Vizio Helps Walmart Cut A Bigger Slice Of The CTV Ad Pie

Walmart and Vizio announced at NewFronts that unified account logins are coming to smart TVs using Vizio’s operating system.

Marketers
Carl’s Jr. And Hardee’s Marketing Goes Regional With Amazon Ads’ Streaming Media

The age-old question for streaming TV advertisers is, how to target the viewers they want while reaching the scale their businesses need. The quick-serve restaurant operator CKE, which owns Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s, sought an answer in a case study with Attain and Amazon Ads.

CTV
America’s Test Kitchen Puts Direct And Programmatic Access On Its Menu

America’s Test Kitchen introduced direct and programmatic buying for its free ad-supported TV channels – marking the first time it’s selling ad inventory as a standalone package.

Marketers
The Rise Of Principal Media And The End Of The Agencies As We Knew Them

Ad agency holding companies are among the most adaptable businesses out there. In recent years holdcos like Publicis, WPP and Omnicom-IPG have stretched our notions of what an agency business even is exactly.

Artificial Intelligence
How One Agency Startup Uses Real-Time Data To Develop Real-Time Ads

Audience preferences are constantly evolving. So why not ads that evolve in real time, too? No, really.

Marketers
MyFitnessPal Wants To Start The Health And Wellness Subsector Of Retail Media

MyFitnessPal has just announced the launch of a data-driven advertising business that draws on its wealth of user-provided meal planning, fitness and nutrition data.

Popular

CTV
America’s Test Kitchen Puts Direct And Programmatic Access On Its Menu

America’s Test Kitchen introduced direct and programmatic buying for its free ad-supported TV channels – marking the first time it’s selling ad inventory as a standalone package.

Marketers
The Rise Of Principal Media And The End Of The Agencies As We Knew Them

PODCAST: The Big Story
The Media Spend Skim

Principal-based buying is on the rise, and it’s causing conflict between agencies and ad tech partners. Plus: What are sell-side agents, and how could they help publishers?

AdExchanger Content Studio
Beyond Programmatic: A New Model For Buying Premium CTV Inventory

If you buy CTV advertising, you’ve likely encountered two approaches to securing premium inventory: programmatic guaranteed (PG) and buying direct, also referred to as direct IO (DIO).

AdExplainer
What Does A Beta Test Of A Sell-Side Agent Look Like?

Now, publishers are exploring automation and optimization through agentic AI. Many publishers have identified a similar use case: sales agents who actively make decisions in the auction on behalf of the publisher.

Join the AdExchanger Community
Join Now

Your trusted source for in-depth programmatic news, views, education and events.
AdExchanger is where marketers, agencies, publishers and tech companies go for the latest information on the trends that are transforming digital media and marketing, from data, privacy, identity and AI to commerce, CTV, measurement and mobile.

NEXT EVENT
Programmatic AI
May 18-20, 2026Park MGM, Las Vegas
Learn More

ABOUT ADEXCHANGER
About Us
Advertise
Contact Us
Events
Subscribe
RSS
Cookie Settings
Privacy & Terms
Accessibility
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging

CONNECT

Jean-Paul Schmetz, Chief of Ads at Brave, has spearheaded the browser’s increasingly complex approach to advertising, driven by a fundamental belief in user-centric targeting. Initially launched in 2016 as an ad-blocking browser, Brave shifted its strategy in 2019 to incorporate opt-in, rewarded ad experiences, and subsequently, takeover display ads and limited pop-up notifications. This evolved due to the realization that a search engine-less browser—and the associated search advertising—was simply unsustainable, according to Schmetz.

A core tenet of Brave’s strategy is a stark contrast to traditional, interest-based advertising, which aims to influence user behavior. Instead, Brave focuses on directly responding to user queries, as evidenced by its approach to targeting—simply utilizing the search term itself and the user's location, without delving into tracking browsing history. This is further reinforced by Brave’s commitment to never using third-party cookies or tracking ad IDs, and actively remembering ad exposures.

Schmetz’s background—including his role in building the Tailcat search engine—has been instrumental in shaping Brave’s technical foundation. He emphasizes the importance of delivering what users want, rather than assuming they want something else. However, the path to achieving this targeted advertising hasn’t been without challenges. Brave has encountered difficulties in convincing publishers to utilize its search ads, citing the significant cost disparity—a click costing around $1 versus a CPM of $5—rendering it an unviable channel for traditional publishers.

Schmetz advocates for a restructuring of the search market, suggesting that Google should distribute revenue to all browsers, regardless of search traffic, rather than maintaining an exclusive arrangement. He argues that the upcoming legal rulings regarding Google’s search monopoly, which require renegotiating exclusive deals annually and sharing search data with competitors, are crucial steps. He believes the remedy would drastically reduce Google’s dominance.

Looking ahead, Schmetz considers the rise of generative AI search, particularly OpenAI’s introduction of ads, as a logical next step. He views OpenAI’s sponsored queries as a form of “sponsored intent” rather than genuine search advertising.

Ultimately, Schmetz appears to be anticipating a shift in the digital advertising landscape, influenced by technological advancements and regulatory pressures. He is betting on a model that prioritizes user control and delivers relevant advertising experiences, positioning Brave as a key player in this evolving ecosystem.