Why a two-seater robotaxi makes more sense than you think | The VergeSkip to main contentThe homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.The VergeThe Verge logo.TechReviewsScienceEntertainmentAIPolicyHamburger Navigation ButtonThe homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.Hamburger Navigation ButtonNavigation DrawerThe VergeThe Verge logo.Login / Sign UpcloseCloseSearchTechExpandAmazonAppleFacebookGoogleMicrosoftSamsungBusinessSee all techReviewsExpandSmart Home ReviewsPhone ReviewsTablet ReviewsHeadphone ReviewsSee all reviewsScienceExpandSpaceEnergyEnvironmentHealthSee all scienceEntertainmentExpandTV ShowsMoviesAudioSee all entertainmentAIExpandOpenAIAnthropicSee all AIPolicyExpandAntitrustPoliticsLawSecuritySee all policyGadgetsExpandLaptopsPhonesTVsHeadphonesSpeakersWearablesSee all gadgetsVerge ShoppingExpandBuying GuidesDealsGift GuidesSee all shoppingGamingExpandXboxPlayStationNintendoSee all gamingStreamingExpandDisneyHBONetflixYouTubeCreatorsSee all streamingTransportationExpandElectric CarsAutonomous CarsRide-sharingScootersSee all transportationFeaturesVerge VideoExpandTikTokYouTubeInstagramPodcastsExpandDecoderThe VergecastVersion HistoryNewslettersArchivesStoreVerge Product UpdatesSubscribeFacebookThreadsInstagramYoutubeRSSThe VergeThe Verge logo.Why a two-seater robotaxi makes more sense than you thinkComments DrawerCommentsLoading commentsGetting the conversation ready...TransportationCloseTransportationPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All TransportationReportCloseReportPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ReportAutonomous CarsCloseAutonomous CarsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All Autonomous CarsWhy a two-seater robotaxi makes more sense than you thinkTesla and Lucid are raising eyebrows with their two-seater autonomous vehicles. But ridehail fleets have very different needs for EVs than retail buyers do, and that matters.by John VoelckerCloseJohn VoelckerPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by John VoelckerMar 26, 2026, 2:00 PM UTCLinkShareGift07 March 2026, USA, San Jose: A test car of the Tesla robotaxi Cybercab is on the road. The vehicles will not have a steering wheel or pedals when they are launched on the market. Tesla boss Elon Musk sees autonomous driving as the future of the electric car manufacturer. Photo: Andrej Sokolow/dpa (Photo by Andrej Sokolow/picture alliance via Getty Images)TransportationCloseTransportationPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All TransportationReportCloseReportPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ReportAutonomous CarsCloseAutonomous CarsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All Autonomous CarsWhy a two-seater robotaxi makes more sense than you thinkTesla and Lucid are raising eyebrows with their two-seater autonomous vehicles. But ridehail fleets have very different needs for EVs than retail buyers do, and that matters.by John VoelckerCloseJohn VoelckerPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by John VoelckerMar 26, 2026, 2:00 PM UTCLinkShareGiftWhen Tesla revealed the Cybercab in 2024, many people were baffled by the automaker’s decision to make it a two-seater. I had similar thoughts when I first saw it at the LA Auto Show later that year: What kind of taxi has only two seats? Once you get above a tuktuk, that’s an asinine idea no one will ever want.For 18 months, that seems to have been the prevailing attitude. On Reddit and other social media platforms, users have weighed in on the utility, or lack thereof, of a two-seat robotaxi. “You could strap a few people to the roof for a special discount,” quipped one commenter. Nevertheless, the first Tesla Cybercab was put into production last month, and now prototypes have been spotted testing both on public roads and on the grounds of Tesla’s assembly plant in Austin, Texas.But in case you thought the Cybercab would be alone in absorbing all the anti-two seater vitriol, now there are two such vehicles.Lucid’s two-seater Lunar robotaxi concept. Image: John Voelcker / The VergeThe Lunar eclipseAt Lucid Motors’ Investor Day in New York City this month, its executive team laid out the EV maker’s plan to reach profitability. It includes three new models on a less expensive midsize platform — the first will arrive next year — an all-new electric powertrain, and a continuing focus on semi-autonomous driving functions and robotaxi partnerships.Then, in a “just one more thing” moment, Lucid’s acting CEO Marc Winterhoff revealed a concept car hidden behind a curtain at one end of the hall. The two-seat robotaxi concept, dubbed the Lucid Lunar, was displayed without doors to show off its interior space and large luggage bay. Visions of the Tesla Cybercab, different but the same, flashed through my mind.In a “fireside chat” with Uber’s Andrew Macdonald, Winterhoff revealed the rideshare company has pledged to buy 20,000 Gravitys fitted with robotaxi sensors and software from Nuro. The two firms plan a similar deal with an upcoming Lucid midsize EV model as well.It took a few hours with Lucid Motors executives for me to understand why, in fact, I was wrong about two-seat robotaxis. And why ridehailing services the world over might buy giant fleets of them. Presuming, of course, that robotaxis prove to be safe, reliable, not a major contributor to urban congestion, and notably cheaper for ridehail fleets than are today’s human drivers using a wide variety of EV and internal combustion models.At minimum, deploying two-seat robotaxis would require an added step during the hail process: Every user would have to say how many people were traveling, to ensure a vehicle arrived with a sufficient number of seats. Users would most likely accept this added friction in the process, especially if two-seaters were cheaper than other alternatives.The Lucid Lunar concept uses the same wide horizontal display on the dash as the Lucid Cosmos, but no steering wheel. It would be built on a shortened version of the midsize platform that will underpin the Cosmos and its two siblings, which would deliver major cost savings on the basic architecture. The Lunar is both lower to the ground and smaller than the Cosmos, and — my “aha!” moment — it was designed to be as energy-efficient and low-cost as possible for buyers.Image: John Voelcker / The VergeSmaller, lighter, CHEAPER!In their fireside chat, Winterhoff and Macdonald noted that more than 90 percent of the rides Uber provides today have just one or two passengers. Other studies put the proportion slightly lower — though still a strong majority. The logic of the vehicle, Lucid chief engineer Zach Walker later explained, was that the needs of ridehail fleet operators differ substantially from those of individual drivers.Physics dictates a two-seat EV will be smaller and lighter than one with more seats. That will make it cheaper to buy and to operate, primarily because it can provide the necessary range from a battery with lower capacity — which will cost less and recharge faster for the same range added. Ridehail companies will need robotaxis with the absolutely lowest possible lifetime cost, to make the expensive tech practical versus human-driven vehicles.The needs of ridehail fleet operators differ substantially from those of individual driversAccording to chief engineer Walker, every 1-kWh reduction in battery size will save a robotaxi operator $1,000 per year in recharging costs, presuming it covers 100,000 miles a year. How efficient could that two-seat robotaxi be versus a four-seat compact EV? Walker said Lucid projects efficiencies of 5.5 miles per kilowatt-hour, perhaps as high as 6 mi/kWh, in typical use. (For comparison, the most energy-efficient EV sold in the US today is the rear-wheel-drive Lucid Air Pure, with an EPA efficiency rating of 146 MPGe, which translates to 4.4 mi/kWh.)Beyond that, he added, there’s a “virtuous circle” of not just size and weight reduction, but engineering to purpose. Walker noted Lucids sold to individual buyers must have stellar roadholding and handling capabilities; it’s part of the brand. But the preset behavior of a robotaxis’ driving algorithm, and the limits of the performance it will demand, are known in advance, and won’t impose handling loads as extreme as a few private owners will. That means suspension structures can be tuned for comfort, using softer and less complex bushings. It could even let Lucid reduce or eliminate certain reinforcements and braces required to keep the structure stiff during extreme handling maneuvers, Walker said.PreviousNext1/4Image: John Voelcker / The VergeDoes lower drag matter?Both the Tesla and Lucid two-seaters are low and sleek, which minimizes aerodynamic drag. That further boosts efficiency at speeds of 30 mph and above, when the energy required to overcome wind resistance exceeds the energy required to move the vehicle itself. That’s an advantage for airport runs that require travel on highways, less so in trips predominantly based in urban environments, as Reilly Brennan of Trucks VC notes in his weekly newsletter.Brennan questioned why the form factor of robotaxis mimicked the shape of a two-door coupe, despite the limitations it imposes on entry and exit. He proposed as an alternative a famous study by designer Giorgetto Giugiaro for a modern New York City taxi, created fully 50 years ago. It’s still crisp, modern, upright — and easier to get into and out of than a coupe.But Giugiaro’s tall, square, upright design would present a challenge for wind resistance. Still, Brennan is convinced it’s the right approach. “Most of the trips for these will be low-speed and urban, which will make the Cd [drag coefficient] issues largely moot,” he said in an email.After seeing the Lucid Lunar, every reporter at Lucid Investor Day had the same second thought I did 18 months earlier, when I saw the Tesla Cybercab: If you just added a steering wheel, that would make an awesome small, fast EV sports coupe.Asked directly about such a possibility, Walker laughed. “Oh, I have lots of ideas in my spare time,” he said. “But this [the Lunar robotaxi] is the one we’re talking about today.”Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.John VoelckerCloseJohn VoelckerPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by John VoelckerAutonomous CarsCloseAutonomous CarsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All Autonomous CarsElectric CarsCloseElectric CarsPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All Electric CarsReportCloseReportPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ReportTeslaCloseTeslaPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All TeslaTransportationCloseTransportationPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All TransportationMost PopularMost PopularThe United States router ban, explainedSeiko resurrected a 44-year-old digital watch NASA astronauts wore to spaceIntel and LG Display may have beaten Apple and Qualcomm with the best laptop battery life everThe best deals we’ve found from Amazon’s Big Spring Sale (so far)Nintendo is going to charge less for digital Switch 2 gamesThe Verge DailyA free daily digest of the news that matters most.Email (required)Sign UpBy submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Advertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native adMore in TransportationUber aims to launch Europe’s first robotaxi service with Pony AI and VerneThe TSA is broken — is privatization next?Sony and Honda ain’t feelin’ the Afeela anymoreGoogle’s Android Automotive is moving from the dashboard to the ‘brain’ of the carZoox is bringing its robotaxis to Austin and MiamiDonut Lab’s solid-state battery could barely hold a charge after getting damagedUber aims to launch Europe’s first robotaxi service with Pony AI and VerneAndrew J. Hawkins8:15 AM UTCThe TSA is broken — is privatization next?Darryl CampbellMar 25Sony and Honda ain’t feelin’ the Afeela anymoreAndrew J. HawkinsMar 25Google’s Android Automotive is moving from the dashboard to the ‘brain’ of the carAndrew J. HawkinsMar 24Zoox is bringing its robotaxis to Austin and MiamiAndrew J. HawkinsMar 24Donut Lab’s solid-state battery could barely hold a charge after getting damagedAndrew J. HawkinsMar 23Advertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native adTop StoriesAn hour agoEveryone hates Ticketmaster. Why’d Trump go easy on them?Video1:00 PM UTCThe versatile Play speaker is a great way into the Sonos world32 minutes agoMeta gets ready to launch two new Ray-Ban AI glasses12:00 PM UTCDJI’s Avata 360 is a more functional, flexible 360 droneMar 25The United States router ban, explained18 minutes agoGovee’s color-changing smart lamps are on sale for up to 30 percent offThe VergeThe Verge logo.FacebookThreadsInstagramYoutubeRSSContactTip UsCommunity GuidelinesArchivesAboutEthics StatementHow We Rate and Review ProductsCookie SettingsTerms of UsePrivacy NoticeCookie PolicyLicensing FAQAccessibilityPlatform Status© 2026 Vox Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved

The prevailing skepticism surrounding two-seater robotaxis, previously voiced regarding Tesla’s Cybercab, is undergoing a significant reassessment, largely driven by Lucid Motors’ unveiling of the Lunar concept. John Voelcker’s analysis centers on the distinct operational demands of ride-hailing fleets compared to those of individual consumers, arguing that a smaller, lighter, and more energy-efficient two-seat vehicle represents a strategically sound approach. The core argument rests on the observed demographic: a substantial majority of ride-hailing trips involve just one or two passengers, creating a market segment perfectly suited to a reduced-capacity vehicle. This translates to lower battery requirements, diminished recharging costs (estimated at $1,000 per year per kilowatt-hour reduction), and a more economical overall operational model for fleet operators. Lucid’s design philosophy, prioritizing efficiency and cost reduction, aligns with this understanding, leveraging a shortened platform and engineered-for-purpose design to minimize weight and enhance fuel economy. The Lunar’s form factor – a sleek, low-profile design – is crucial for optimizing aerodynamic drag, particularly at speeds common in urban environments, adding to the overall efficiency. The proposed partnership between Lucid and Uber, coupled with a similar agreement with Nuro, underscores the viability and strategic importance of this approach. Furthermore, the simplified usage model – requiring passengers to specify the number of occupants – offers a minor inconvenience outweighed by the potential cost savings. The vehicle’s design incorporates a wide horizontal display, similar to Lucid’s Cosmos, and lacks a steering wheel and pedals, reflecting the autonomous operation intended. Engineering refinements, such as softer suspension bushings and reduced reinforcement, further contribute to the cost-effectiveness, acknowledging the operational differences between passenger vehicles and robotaxi designs. Voelcker effectively dismantles the initial dismissive reaction to the Cybercab’s form factor, highlighting the practical advantages of a smaller, lighter, and more energy-efficient vehicle perfectly attuned to the specific needs of a ride-hailing fleet. This represents a shift in perspective, understanding that optimizing for cost and efficiency – rather than purely prioritizing passenger capacity – is paramount for the successful deployment of autonomous vehicles in a commercial transport setting.