LmCast :: Stay tuned in

Sports Betting Is Everywhere, Especially on Credit Reports

Recorded: March 28, 2026, 4 a.m.

Original Summarized

Sports Betting Is Everywhere, Especially on Credit Reports - Liberty Street Economics

Museum & Visits
Regional Economy
Data & Statistics
Careers
Blog
Press Center

About the New York Fed

About the New York Fed

What We Do
Who We Are

Bank Leadership

Communities We Serve
Governance

Board of Directors
Disclosures
Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
Annual Financial Statements
Org Chart

More About Us

News & Events
Advisory Groups
Vendor Information
Holiday Schedule

At the New York Fed, our mission is to make the U.S. economy stronger and the financial system more stable for all segments of society. We do this by executing monetary policy, providing financial services, supervising banks and conducting research and providing expertise on issues that impact the nation and communities we serve.

The Teller Window is a publication featuring expert knowledge and insight from the New York Fed, including thoughts and perspectives from senior leaders.

Do you have a request for information and records? Learn how to submit it.

Learn about the history of the New York Fed and central banking in the United States through articles, speeches, photos and video.

Markets & Policy Implementation

Markets & Policy Implementation

DATA
Reference Rates

Effective Federal Funds Rate
Overnight Bank Funding Rate
Secured Overnight Financing Rate
SOFR Averages & Index
Broad General Collateral Rate
Tri-Party General Collateral Rate

Desk Operations

Treasury Securities
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities
Repos
Reverse Repos
Securities Lending
Central Bank Liquidity Swaps

System Open Market Account Holdings
Primary Dealer Statistics
Historical Transaction Data

 
 
DOMESTIC MARKET OPERATIONS

Monetary Policy Implementation

Treasury Securities
Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities
Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
Agency Debt Securities
Repos & Reverse Repos
Securities Lending

Discount Window
Treasury Debt Auctions & Buybacksas Fiscal Agent

 
INTERNATIONAL MARKET OPERATIONS

Foreign Exchange
Foreign Reserves Management
Central Bank Swap Arrangements

 
 
ACROSS MARKETS
Statements & Operating Policies
Market Intelligence

Survey of Market Expectations

Annual Reports
Counterparties

Primary Dealers
Standing Repo Counterparties
Reverse Repo Counterparties
Foreign Exchange Counterparties
Foreign Reserves Management Counterparties

Operational Readiness
Central Bank & International Account Services
Programs Archive

Economic Research

Economic Research

U.S. Economy

Consumer Expectations & Behavior

Survey of Consumer Expectations
Household Debt & Credit Report
Home Price Changes

Growth & Inflation

Economic Heterogeneity Indicators (EHIs)
Multivariate Core Trend Inflation
New York Fed DSGE Model
New York Fed Staff Nowcast
R-star: Natural Rate of Interest

Labor Market

Labor Market for Recent College GraduatesLabor Market Tightness Index

Financial Stability

Corporate Bond Market Distress Index
Losses from Natural Disasters
Outlook-at-Risk
Treasury Term Premia
Yield Curve as a Leading Indicator

Banking

Banking Research Data Sets
Quarterly Trends for Consolidated U.S. Banking Organizations
Reserve Demand Elasticity

  

REGIONAL ECONOMY

Empire State Manufacturing Survey
Business Leaders Survey
Regional Business Surveys: Special Topics
Regional Employment Trends
Early Benchmarked Employment Data

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY
Global Supply Chain Pressure Index

  

RESEARCHERS

Staff Economists
Visiting Scholars
Resident Scholars

PUBLICATIONS

Liberty Street Economics
Staff Reports
Economic Policy Review
Outside Journals

RESEARCH CENTERS

Applied Macroeconomics& Econometrics Center (AMEC)
Center for Microeconomic Data (CMD)

CALENDAR

Economic Indicators Calendar

Financial Institution Supervision

Financial Institution Supervision

Supervision & Regulation

Circulars
Regulations

Reporting Forms & Instructions

Reporting Forms
Correspondence

Bank Applications
Consumer Protection

Community Reinvestment Act
Frauds and Scams

As part of our core mission, we supervise and regulate financial institutions in the Second District. Our primary objective is to maintain a safe and competitive U.S. and global banking system.

The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.

Need to file a report with the New York Fed? Here are all of the forms, instructions and other information related to regulatory and statistical reporting in one spot.

The New York Fed works to protect consumers as well as provides information and resources on how to avoid and report specific scams.

Financial Services& Infrastructure

Financial Services & Infrastructure

Financial Services & Operations

Services For Financial Institutions
Payment Services
Payment System Oversight
International Services, Seminars & Training

Financial Market Infrastructure & Reform

Tri-Party Repo Infrastructure Reform
Managing Foreign Exchange
Money Market Funds
Over-The-Counter Derivatives

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York works to promote sound and well-functioning financial systems and markets through its provision of industry and payment services, advancement of infrastructure reform in key markets and training and educational support to international institutions.

The New York Innovation Center bridges the worlds of finance, technology, and innovation and generates insights into high-value central bank-related opportunities.

The growing role of nonbank financial institutions, or NBFIs, in U.S. financial markets is a transformational trend with implications for monetary policy and financial stability.

The New York Fed offers the Central Banking Seminar and several specialized courses for central bankers and financial supervisors.

Community Development& Education

Community Development & Education

Community Development

Staff

Fed System Initiatives

Fed Communities

Fed Listens

Fed Small Business

Workforce Development

Other Community Development Work
Calendar

Economic Education

Programs

High School Fed Challenge

College Fed Challenge

Teacher Professional Development

Classroom Visits

Museum & Learning Center Visits

Resources

Educational Comic Books

Economist Spotlight Series

Lesson Plans and Resources

Economic Education Calendar

The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.

Liberty Street Economics

« China’s Electric Trade | Main

March 25, 2026

Sports Betting Is Everywhere, Especially on Credit Reports

Jacob Goss and Daniel Mangrum
Editor’s Note: The chart notes for the first chart have been updated to correct errors in how we labeled the trend line colors. (March 25, 2026)

Since 2018, more than thirty states have legalized mobile sports betting, leading to more than a half trillion dollars in wagers. In our recent Staff Report, we examine how legalized sports betting affects household financial health by comparing betting activity and consumer credit outcomes between states that legalized to those that have not. We find that legalization increases spending at online sportsbooks roughly tenfold, but betting does not stop at state boundaries. Nearby areas where betting is not legal still experience roughly 15 percent the increase of counties where it is legal. At the same time, consumer financial health suffers. Our analysis finds rising delinquencies in participating states, with spillover effects across state lines. What is more, even though the share of people taking up sports betting after legalization is small (roughly 3 percent of the population), overall credit delinquency rises by about 0.3 percentage points. Our findings suggest that sports betting can have dramatic implications for household financial stability.
Legalization Leads to High Spending that Continues to Rise
Using anonymized transaction-level consumer spending data, we aggregate online sportsbook deposits at a county-quarter level to compare counties in legal states to those in not-legal states before and after legalization. The chart below plots two measures of average online sportsbook deposits within legal states over time. The blue line (measured by the left axis), presents average deposits per adult. We see that spending grew dramatically after mid-2020, exhibits seasonal patterns consistent with the National Football League season, and continues to grow through the end of 2025.
The red line (measured on the right axis) shows the total deposits divided by the number of individuals with at least one online sportsbook deposit each quarter. In contrast to average deposits in the population, average deposits per bettor have leveled since 2022. We conclude that long-run growth in total betting is driven less by rising deposits among existing bettors and more by broader participation and continued market expansion.

Average Deposits at Sportsbooks Rise Steeply After Mid-2020
Sources: Earnest Analytics; authors’ calculations.Notes: The chart plots quarterly average deposits at sportsbooks per adult (left axis, red) and per bettor (right axis, blue) in counties with legal mobile sports betting. Both series are unweighted averages across all counties in states where mobile betting is legal in that quarter.

Betting Across Borders
An interesting wrinkle to sports betting access is that potential bettors do not have to be residents of a legal state to place a wager. Since they only need to be physically present in a legal state at the time they make a bet, those living near legal states have relatively easy access to legal sports betting. To account for spillovers across borders in our analysis, we split our sample into three mutually exclusive groups in each quarter: a direct treatment group of counties within a legal state, a spillover group of counties near a legal state but in still-illegal states (within fifteen miles), and a control group of counties farther away from any legal states (at least sixty miles from a legal state). We then compare the evolution of online betting in each quarter relative to the first quarter of legal access (own legalization for the legal counties or nearby legalization for the spillover counties).
The chart below plots the estimated effect of legalization on average deposits at sportsbooks separately for the direct effect and the spillover effect in each quarter relative to the first quarter of legal access. We find a large increase in spending within state lines (blue line) with a similarly sharp but smaller increase in nearby spillover counties (gold line). On average, online betting deposits per adult increase by roughly $30 per quarter in the first few quarters after legalization and grow to around $40 after three years. Most striking is the magnitude of spillovers: for nearby counties that are not legal, the impact is roughly 15 percent the size of the direct effect, representing significant spending coming from across state lines.

Sportsbook Deposits Grow Dramatically After Legalization in Legal Counties and in Nearby Illegal Counties
Sources: Earnest Analytics; authors’ calculations.Notes: The chart plots estimates (in circles and squares) and 95 percent confidence intervals (in shaded regions) for the change in average sportsbook deposits per adult in quarters relative to the first quarter of legal access. Legal access is defined as own-state legalization for counties in legal states (blue line) and nearby legalization for counties in spillover states (gold line). The full empirical specification can be found in Goss and Mangrum (2026).

Implications for Consumer Credit
Next, we examine credit delinquencies using the New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel (CCP), a nationally representative 5 percent sample of anonymized Equifax credit reports, with the same geographic approach as above. The chart below shows the impact of legalization on the share of the county population with any account ninety or more days past due, with the blue line showing the direct effect and the gold line showing the spillover effect. Following legalization, delinquency rose steadily in legal counties and surpassed half a percentage point three years after legalization, representing a noticeable deterioration in repayment performance from a baseline of 10.7 percent. Spillover counties follow a similar pattern with a smaller magnitude increase in delinquencies, suggesting that, as with betting activity, the financial consequences extend across state lines. In our Staff Report, we show that the overall increase in delinquency is driven by borrowers under the age of 40. Following legalization, the share of under-40 borrowers who are delinquent rises by 1.02 percentage points for credit cards and 0.55 percentage point for auto loans.
Our consumer credit analysis explores the overall impact of sports betting on the full population without differentiating between those that gamble and those that do not. However, the spending analysis shows that only around 3 percent of the population newly takes up sports betting after legalization. If we instead focus on only the 3 percent of people who newly take up sports betting after legalization, the implied increase in delinquency rate conditional on take-up is 10 percentage points, roughly a doubling from the baseline rate.

Credit Delinquencies Increase Steadily After Sports Betting Legalization
Sources: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; authors’ calculations.Notes: The chart plots estimates (in circles and squares) and 95 percent confidence intervals (in shaded regions) for the change in credit delinquency rates in quarters relative to the first quarter of legal access. Legal access is defined as own-state legalization for counties in legal states (blue line) and nearby legalization for counties in spillover states (gold line). The full empirical specification can be found in Goss and Mangrum (2026).

Implications for Not-Yet-Legal States
In our Staff Report, we find that following the legalization of sports betting in a state, credit delinquencies increase, driven by those under 40 years old. In addition, betting activity, and the resulting consumer credit distress, do not stop at state boundaries. Some who live in not-yet-legal states near legal states travel across state lines to wager and delinquencies rise in these not-legal areas as well. In legal states, tax revenue from sports betting can help offset some of the negative impacts of legalized sports betting (states collected nearly $3 billion in such tax revenue in 2024 alone), but states that are not legal themselves bear negative consequences of sports betting without the tax revenue to offset these costs. As we show in the Staff Report, the negative consequences without compensating tax revenue may create incentives for states to legalize, particularly those with population centers near legal states.

Jacob Goss is a former research analyst in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group and a current graduate student at the University of Wisconsin—Madison.

Daniel Mangrum is a research economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

How to cite this post:
Jacob Goss and Daniel Mangrum, “Sports Betting Is Everywhere, Especially on Credit Reports,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, March 25, 2026, https://doi.org/10.59576/lse.20260325
BibTeX: View | Download


@article{JacobGossandDanielMangrum2026,
author={Jacob Goss and Daniel Mangrum},
title={Sports Betting Is Everywhere, Especially on Credit Reports},
journal={Liberty Street Economics},
note={Liberty Street Economics Blog},
number={March 25},
year={2026},
url={https://doi.org/10.59576/lse.20260325}
}

You may also be interested in:

Sports Betting Across Borders: Spatial Spillovers, Credit Distress, and Fiscal Externalities

Where Are Mortgage Delinquencies Rising the Most?

Student Loan Delinquencies Are Back, and Credit Scores Take a Tumble 

DisclaimerThe views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

Share this:
Share on X (Opens in new window)
X

Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Facebook

Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
LinkedIn

Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
Email

Print (Opens in new window)
Print

Comments

You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a commentLeave a ReplyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * (Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)Name *
Email *
Website

Δ

All Liberty Street EconomicsSearch
RSS Feed

Follow Liberty Street Economics

receive email alerts for this page

WATCH: About the Research Group
“What’s really driving inflation?” “Why do some neighborhoods bounce back faster than others?” Meet some of the New York Fed researchers working to answer questions that matter most to the economy.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.
The editors are Michael Fleming, Thomas Klitgaard, Maxim Pinkovskiy, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.
Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.
The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

View by TopicBalance of PaymentsBank CapitalBanksCentral BankCorporate FinanceCOVID-19 FacilitiesCreditCrisisCryptocurrenciesDemographicsDSGEEconomic HistoryEducationEmploymentEuro AreaExchange RatesExpectationsExportsFederal ReserveFed FundsFinancial InstitutionsFinancial IntermediationFinancial MarketsFiscal PolicyForecastingHey, Economist!Historical EchoesHousehold FinanceHousingHuman CapitalInflationInternational EconomicsLabor MarketLender of Last ResortLiquidityMacroeconomicsMicroeconomicsMonetary PolicyNew JerseyNew YorkNonbank (NBFI)PandemicPanicPuerto RicoRecessionRegional AnalysisRegulationRepoStocksStudent LoansSupply ChainSystemic RiskTariffsTreasuryUnemployment

Most Read this Year

Who Is Paying for the 2025 U.S. Tariffs?
Are Businesses Absorbing the Tariffs or Passing Them On to Their Customers?
Credit Score Impacts from Past Due Student Loan Payments
Is College Still Worth It?
Why Does the U.S. Always Run a Trade Deficit?

Useful LinksEconomic Indicators Calendar
FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data)
Economic Roundtable
Macro Blog
OECD Insights
World Bank/All about Finance
Comment Guidelines  
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.
Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎
Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.
Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives2026 March 2026
February 2026
January 2026
2025 December 2025
November 2025
October 2025
September 2025
August 2025
July 2025
June 2025
May 2025
April 2025
March 2025
February 2025
January 2025
2024 December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
2023 December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
2022 December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
2021 December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
2020 December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
2019 December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
2018 December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
2017 December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
2016 December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
2015 December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
2014 December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
2013 December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
2012 December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
2011 December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011

Request a Speaker
International, Seminars & Training
Governance & Culture Reform

Data Visualization
Economic ResearchTracker
Markets Data APIs
Podcast

Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy
Site Map

Jacob Goss and Daniel Mangrum’s research, published in March 2026 within the Liberty Street Economics blog, investigates the surprising and significant impact of legalized sports betting on household financial health. The core of their analysis centers around a comparative study of states that had legalized mobile sports betting with those that had not, utilizing anonymized consumer transaction data from the New York Fed’s Consumer Credit Panel (CCP). Their findings reveal a complex and concerning trend – while sports betting participation remains relatively low (around 3% of the population), legalization has demonstrably triggered a tenfold increase in online sportsbook spending and, crucially, has contributed to an elevated rise in consumer credit delinquencies across both legal and bordering non-legal states.

The researchers segmented their data into three groups: counties directly impacted by legalization, counties within fifteen miles of legal states, and a control group at least sixty miles away. They observed a sharp initial increase in sports betting deposits—approximately $30 per quarter in the first few months after legalization and growing to around $40 after three years—within both legal and spillover areas. This increase was particularly pronounced in the initial phases, suggesting a period of market expansion and rapid adoption. A key discovery was the substantial 'spillover' effect, with counties near legal states experiencing roughly 15 percent of the increase in betting activity, representing a considerable influx of funds from outside the defined legal boundaries. The authors highlight that this phenomenon underscores the interconnectedness of financial markets and the potential reach of new forms of consumer spending.

Furthermore, the study meticulously examined credit delinquency rates, revealing a steady increase in delinquencies within states that had legalized sports betting. This rise was notably driven by younger borrowers under the age of 40. The observed delinquency increase was approximately 0.3 percentage points, despite the relatively small percentage of the population actively engaging in sports betting. This highlights the potential vulnerability of consumer finances to addictive behaviors and impulsive spending. Goss and Mangrum carefully detail the data, presenting estimates and confidence intervals to illustrate the magnitude of these effects. They correctly acknowledge the limitations of their analysis, specifically noting that it does not differentiate between consumers who bet and those who do not, yet demonstrates a clear link between new engagement in sports betting and greater credit risk.

The authors conclude that the implications of legalized sports betting extend beyond simple market dynamics. The ripple effect of increased spending and subsequent credit distress wasn’t contained by state lines, causing financial instability in nearby, non-legal regions. The findings suggest a need for careful consideration of the potential financial consequences accompanying the expansion of online gambling and the importance of proactive measures to mitigate associated risks. Goss and Mangrum’s work provides a timely and informative analysis of this relatively new trend in consumer behavior and its impact on the broader financial landscape.