Quantum ‘Jamming’ Could Help Unlock the Mysteries of Causality | WIREDSkip to main contentMenuSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuAccountAccountNewslettersSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoLivestreamsMerchSearchSearchMatt von Hippel ScienceMay 23, 2026 7:00 AMQuantum ‘Jamming’ Could Help Unlock the Mysteries of CausalityTo keep communications secure in a post-quantum world, cryptographers are digging down into the concept of cause and effect.Courtesy of Samuel Velasco/Quanta MagazineCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyThe original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine.For the past few decades, researchers have understood that quantum computers should eventually be able to crack the widely used codes that secure much of the digital world. To protect against this fate, they’ve spent years developing new codes that appear to be safe from future safecrackers armed with quantum computers.At the same time, they’ve also devised ingenious ways to use the rules of quantum mechanics to keep communications secure. But quantum mechanics, just like the “classical” mechanics that preceded it, is just a theory of nature. What if it eventually gets superseded by a fuller theory, just as quantum mechanics supplanted Newtonian physics a century ago? Will these quantum communication techniques still be secure in a world where there’s an even more fundamental set of rules?“In terms of these cryptographic protocols, it’s good to be paranoid,” said Ravishankar Ramanathan, a quantum information theorist at the University of Hong Kong who works on quantum cryptography. “Let’s try to minimize the assumptions behind the protocol. Let’s suppose that at some future date people realize that quantum mechanics is not the ultimate theory of nature.”It’s a possibility worth considering. The difficulty of outstanding problems—like reconciling quantum mechanics and gravity—suggests that a post-quantum theory of nature might involve something quite unexpected.To guard against the possibility that their protocols are based on faulty assumptions, some quantum cryptographers search for even more basic principles to build upon. Instead of starting from quantum mechanics, they dig deeper, down to the very concept of causality.A Subtle SabotageOne way to understand developments in this area is to consider quantum key distribution, which involves taking advantage of the rules of quantum mechanics to pass along a key—something that can be used to decode a secret message—in a way that cannot be covertly tampered with. Quantum key distribution makes use of quantum entanglement, which locks two particles together through one of their properties, like spin. Quantum entanglement contains something of a trip wire. If anyone tries to mess with the entanglement—as they would if they tried to steal the key—the intrusion will destroy the entanglement, revealing the sabotage. This is because of a fundamental quantum mechanical principle called the “monogamy of entanglement.”But what if this principle no longer held? In such a case, if the people passing the message did not have complete control of their devices, an outsider could potentially subtly change the particles’ entanglement, disrupting the communication without leaving a trace.This process is called quantum jamming, and efforts to understand it have surged in recent years.For many scientists, jamming is appealing because it can help them better understand both quantum mechanics and the nature of cause and effect. They wonder: Are there deep principles that forbid jamming, that make it impossible? Or, if no principle forbids it, could jamming occur in the real world?Jim the JammerMichał Eckstein, a theoretical physicist at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland, likes to illustrate jamming with a story. Its protagonists are the classic characters from explanations of quantum mechanics, Alice and Bob.“Suppose you have Alice and Bob, and they meet a magician, Jim the Jammer,” Eckstein said. “The magician says, ‘I have two balls; one is white, and one is black.’”The balls stand in for a pair of entangled particles. If two particles are entangled, they have a property that is linked in some way—if you measure the first particle and find that its spin is up, for example, the other particle’s spin will inevitably be down, and vice versa. This holds true even if the other particle is halfway across the universe. Here the balls are linked such that if one is white, the other will always be black.In the classic trope of stage magic, Jim lets members of the audience see the balls get placed into two boxes, mixed up, and given to Alice and Bob. No one, at this point, knows which ball is in which box.Then Alice and Bob get into rocket ships that fly off in opposite directions at close to the speed of light. After a while, Alice opens her box, and Bob opens his. But in the meantime, Jim has performed a trick, and the balls have changed.At first, neither Alice nor Bob notices Jim’s interference. Each expects to have a 50 percent chance of seeing a white or black ball, and when each opens up their box, the ball is either white or black. Nothing Jim does can change that.When Alice and Bob meet back on Earth, though, the magician’s trick is revealed. When Alice and Bob compare their measurements, they find that the balls are the same color. Jim has shifted the nature of the balls’ entanglement—from being opposite colors to being perfect matches.That’s the basic idea, though in reality the process of quantum jamming is a little more complicated.In the mid-1990s, Jacob Grunhaus, Sandu Popescu, and Daniel Rohrlich were exploring just how far a theory could go beyond the rules of quantum mechanics while still respecting a core principle of Einstein’s: You can’t send information faster than the speed of light. Einstein’s mid-century thought experiments showed that without this “no-signaling” principle, the very notion of cause and effect would start to fray. Since then, the no-signaling principle has become a core assumption when physicists consider what might lie beyond quantum mechanics. “When we work in quantum foundations, what we take very seriously is the no-signaling principle,” said Mirjam Weilenmann of the French national research institute Inria.Grunhaus, Popescu, and Rohrlich imagined jamming as a kind of super-entanglement that could interfere with entangled particles. Just as you could use a measuring device to determine the fate of a distant entangled particle, you could use a hypothetical jamming device to change the correlation between a pair of distant entangled particles. If this jamming procedure obeyed a few key rules, some physicists argue, it would secretly disrupt quantum entanglement without disrupting causality.The idea of quantum jamming is so strange that initially physicists didn’t know quite what to do with it. “We wrote that paper and that was the end of it,” Popescu said.Cause and EffectTwenty years later, the time was right to explore it further.Quantum cryptography had grown, as quantum computers went from theoretical ideas to experiments in the real world. In the first decade of the 2000s, several groups developed device-independent quantum key distribution, a quantum cryptography procedure that depends on the monogamy of entanglement.In 2016, Ramanathan and Paweł Horodecki were thinking about these protocols when they found the paper by Grunhaus, Popescu, and Rohrlich. “We started to realize that this property of monogamy, upon which all of device-independent cryptography is based, completely fails once you start to allow these types of jamming correlations,” Ramanathan said.Soon, jamming was the subject of vigorous discussion. Many researchers felt the thought experiment was missing something important: While jamming can’t be used to send signals faster than light, influencing the state of a distant quantum particle still feels like the kind of “spooky action at a distance” that long ago tormented Einstein.But for some researchers, the discomfort that quantum jamming creates is inspiring new ideas. “I see it as a tool to try to help hone our intuitions of what the right definition of causation is,” said Roger Colbeck, who proposed one of the first protocols for device-independent cryptography in his 2006 doctoral thesis.Now at King’s College London, Colbeck is working with V. Vilasini at Inria research center at the University of Grenoble Alpes to classify the way cause and effect work in different theories. For them, jamming serves as a useful edge case. They’re seeking another fundamental principle, like the no-signaling principle, that explains which rules jamming breaks.The groups of Ramanathan and Horodecki responded to this work, as well as a recent paper by Weilenmann, in a preprint in December 2025 that they wrote with Eckstein, Tomasz Miller, and Paweł Horodecki’s father, Ryszard. Now, the researchers are in conversation, trying to clarify terms, fix misunderstandings, and look for the fundamental principles behind physical theories.“That’s for me the most interesting question,” Eckstein said. “Is there any new physics behind it? Can physics include such phenomena?”Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.CommentsBack to topTriangleYou Might Also LikeHow to find us: Add WIRED.com to your preferred sources in GoogleHow the Canvas hack threatened thousands of schoolsBig Story: I've covered robots for years—this one is eerily lifelikeOrbs, saucers, and flashes on the moon—here’s what’s in the UFO filesTake our survey: What does “home” mean to you?Topicsquantumcryptographyphysicsquantum physicsRead MoreThe Emptiest Places in the Universe Might Contain Its Best SecretsOnce dismissed as empty expanses between galaxies, cosmic voids are becoming one of the most promising tools for probing the universe’s biggest mysteries.Becky FerreiraNewly Deciphered Sabotage Malware May Have Targeted Iran’s Nuclear Program—and Predates StuxnetResearchers have finally cracked Fast16, mysterious code capable of silently tampering with calculation and simulation software. It was created in 2005—and likely deployed by the US or an ally.Andy GreenbergBuild a Radio Wave Detector With Balls of Aluminum Foil!Here’s how you can hack together a radio transmitter and receiver out of stuff you have at home—and explore the weirdness of wireless.Rhett AllainThe First Atomic Bomb Test in 1945 Created an Entirely New MaterialThe discovery from the Trinity nuclear test site shows how extreme conditions can result in materials never before seen in nature or in the lab.Marta MussoWhy Soccer Still Defies Statistical AnalysisSarah Rudd, who once ran analytics for Arsenal, made her name applying the tenets of probability theory to movements on the pitch. Even she admits not everything can be solved with data.Nick GreeneMira Murati Wants Her AI to ‘Keep Humans in the Loop’The Thinking Machines Lab founder and former CTO of OpenAI tells WIRED she isn’t interested in automating people out of jobs. Instead, she’s building AI that can collaborate.Will KnightUsing AI for Just 10 Minutes Might Make You Lazy and Dumb, Study ShowsNew research suggests that reliance on AI assistants can have a negative impact on people’s ability to think and problem solve.Will KnightScientists Are Starting to Unlock the Nanoscale Secrets of the Immune SystemAt WIRED Health, immunologist Daniel Davis detailed the ways in which new technologies are enabling a better understanding of the human immune system.Anna McKieDangerous New Linux Exploit Gives Attackers Root Access to Countless ComputersThe exploit, dubbed CopyFail and tracked as CVE-2026-31431, allows hackers to take over PCs and data center servers. The Linux vulnerabilities have been patched—but many machines remain at risk.Dan Goodin, Ars TechnicaA 'Golden Orb' on the Ocean Floor Came From a Mysterious AnimalA fascinating, unclassifiable orb found in the Gulf of Alaska is not an alien object, as some speculated, but the remains of a poorly documented animal.Jorge GarayNick Bostrom Has a Plan for Humanity’s ‘Big Retirement’The philosopher thinks humans should pursue advanced AI and the promise of a “solved world.”Steven LevyOverworked AI Agents Turn Marxist, Researchers FindIn a recent experiment, mistreated AI agents started grumbling about inequality and calling for collective bargaining rights.Will KnightWIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersLivestreamsTravelFAQWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesWearablesCouponsGift GuidesAdvertiseContact UsManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

Researchers are investigating the concept of cause and effect within the context of quantum mechanics to secure communications in a post-quantum world, exploring the possibility that a more fundamental theory of nature might supersede current quantum mechanical rules. This inquiry stems from the need to ensure the security of cryptographic protocols that rely on quantum principles, prompting cryptographers to examine the underlying assumptions of quantum mechanics. One approach involves delving into the concept of quantum jamming to understand how interference can occur within systems based on quantum entanglement.

Quantum key distribution relies on quantum entanglement, where two particles are linked such that measuring one instantly dictates the state of the other. This link is governed by the monogamy of entanglement, which acts as a constraint on how entanglement can be distributed. Quantum jamming explores what happens when this principle might be circumvented, potentially allowing an external entity to subtly alter the entanglement between distant particles without leaving external traces, raising questions about the stability of quantum correlations.

The concept of jamming is illustrated through thought experiments, such as the analogy of Jim the Jammer, which demonstrates how entanglement correlations can be manipulated. In these scenarios, an external interference can shift the fundamental relationship between entangled particles, changing their correlation from an expected state to an altered state, which mirrors the potential disruption of cause and effect.

The theoretical exploration of jamming is deepened by considering the no-signaling principle, a core assumption derived from Einstein’s work, which posits that information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light. Physicists like Jacob Grunhaus, Sandu Popescu, and Daniel Rohrlich explored hypothetical super-entanglement, or jamming correlations, that could interfere with entangled particles while still respecting the no-signaling principle. They posited that such jamming might secretly disrupt quantum entanglement without violating causality.

This line of inquiry evolved as quantum cryptography developed and researchers realized that the monogamy of entanglement, upon which device-independent cryptography is founded, breaks down when these jamming correlations are permitted. This realization led to vigorous discussion among researchers regarding the implications of quantum jamming. Some find the discomfort caused by this phenomenon to be a valuable tool for refining intuitions about the definition of causation.

Current efforts focus on identifying the fundamental principles that govern which rules jamming transgress. Researchers are seeking new foundational principles, similar to the no-signaling principle, that can explain the constraints on causal manipulation in quantum systems. This work involves ongoing dialogue among groups, such as those involving Ramanathan, Horodecki, Weilenmann, and others, aiming to clarify terminology and uncover the underlying physical principles that govern causality in relation to quantum phenomena. Ultimately, the study of quantum jamming serves as an edge case to probe the limits of physical theories and advance our understanding of the relationship between cause and effect in both quantum and potential future physics.