I Miss Terry Pratchett
Recorded: May 23, 2026, 12:57 p.m.
| Original | Summarized |
The spell that wouldn't leave · mahl.me MAHL DOT ME · GEORGES & LOUIS · TWO BROTHERS, ONE NAME · WELCOME · MAHL DOT ME · GEORGES & LOUIS · TWO BROTHERS, ONE NAME · WELCOME MAHL DOT ME · GEORGES & LOUIS · TWO BROTHERS, ONE NAME · WELCOME · MAHL DOT ME · GEORGES & LOUIS · TWO BROTHERS, ONE NAME · WELCOME The spell that wouldn't leave ONLINE / FR SAT, MAY 23, 2026 GEORGES Garden About Georges Louis Blog Sutom Maps MAY 23, 2026 BY GEORGES There is a theory, popular among certain very old and very tired philosophers, that all memories take up a kind of furniture in the head. The good ones are armchairs. The painful ones are filing cabinets, usually full. And then there are the memories that are neither: the ones that arrive uninvited, settle in, and start terrorising the other occupants by kicking over the chairs. Rincewind tried to force the memory out of his mind, but it was rather enjoying itself there, terrorizing the other occupants and kicking over the furniture. I was sixteen when I first read that sentence. I was sitting in the back row of a French classroom, next to my friend Mathieu, and the teacher was explaining something important about a comma. The pocket edition was cheap, the cover was lurid, and Mathieu and I had read every Pratchett the school library would admit to owning, plus several it would not. “In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.” Nine words. A complete cosmology. Most physics departments would settle for that. “The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.” I read that line at an age when adults were enthusiastically trying to put things in mine. It did not stop them. But it did mean that, from then on, I noticed them doing it, and noticing is half the trick. He also believed that if you put any two things next to each other for long enough they would begin to develop a personality, and quite possibly grievances. This is why he was, technically, correct about cats. ↩ ← Back to all posts © 2026 Mahl Brothers mahl.me made in paris by 2 bros yo |
There is a theory suggesting that memories occupy physical space in the mind, where positive recollections reside as armchairs, painful ones as full filing cabinets, and unwanted memories act like disruptive forces that kick over the existing furniture. The author recalls reading this sentiment from Terry Pratchett, who observed that even when attempting to expel a memory, it continues to exist and cause disturbance. This reflection connects to the author's own experience, stemming from reading a sentence that refused to leave his mind, emphasizing the persistent nature of certain thoughts. The author reflects on the nature of reading for adolescents, noting that deeply immersive reading often occurs in secret spaces, such as the back of a classroom, which mirrors the need for smaller, portable books. The author suggests that Pratchett’s books were intentionally designed to be small enough for concealment, pointing out that the author believed Pratchett wrote cosmologies that could be hidden within everyday objects, such as a mathematics textbook. Pratchett's philosophical approach, as interpreted by the author, centered on the idea that the universe is vast and ridiculous, and the pursuit of an open mind invites people to impose their own beliefs onto it. The author notes that this philosophy resonated during a period when adults were actively shaping adolescent thought, yet the essential act of noticing these imposed ideas is crucial. The author details the literary figures found in Pratchett’s work, such as Rincewind, who embodies the archetype of the reluctant protagonist—a coward, an underachiever, and a wizard whose most powerful spell resides against his will. This character serves as a familiar model for teenagers. Following Rincewind, the author notes the progression through other archetypes like the figures of the City Watch, Vimes, Carrot, and Angua, reflecting an exploration of social and moral structures. The author also expresses a desire to understand the world of the Witches, suggesting a need for deep, insider knowledge rather than superficial understanding. The author also addresses themes of mortality and authorship, noting Pratchett’s approach to death through works like Shaking Hands With Death, which the author considers a profound statement on dying. Furthermore, Pratchett’s method of scripting his own ending is highlighted as a distinctive act of authorship. The author conveys a sense of loss regarding the transition from adolescence to adulthood, noting that the context of the classroom and the shared experience with friends has changed following the death of Pratchett. A sense of longing exists for further literary exploration, specifically for the next book, and for the format of literature that served as an accessible gateway for young readers. The author concludes by suggesting that the legacy of such powerful narratives continues to impact subsequent readers, implying that the exploration of profound ideas remains active even after the author's passing. |