The Cookware Industry Has a Major Fight Brewing Over PFAS Claims | WIREDSkip to main contentMenuSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuAccountAccountNewslettersSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoLivestreamsMerchSearchSearchMolly TaftScienceMay 26, 2026 7:00 AMThe Cookware Industry Has a Major Fight Brewing Over PFAS ClaimsThere’s a new front in the war over the safety of chemicals used to make nonstick pans.Photograph: Getty ImagesCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyThe war over forever chemicals in cookware has seen celebrity chefs, major cookware makers, and state legislatures enter into battle. Now, a new front has opened over advertising claims.Cookware company Caraway is alleging that “Big Cookware” is using a lawsuit to try to “silence” the company, which rose to prominence making forever-chemical-free pans. Caraway recently launched a marketing campaign in response to a lawsuit filed in February by two large pan makers, which claims that Caraway is harming their reputation by marketing its products as free of “toxic” chemicals—despite never mentioning either company by name.The lawsuit, filed by Groupe SEB USA and Meyer in the Southern District of New York, claims that Caraway’s marketing around forever chemicals, a colloquial term for per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), is harmful to the industry as a whole. Caraway’s marketing materials, the two companies say in the suit, is not grounded in scientific fact and “has caused immense and continuing harm to consumers, to Plaintiffs, and to other cookware and bakeware companies in the marketplace.”In response to questions from WIRED, Carmine Zarlenga, a lawyer at Mayer Brown representing Groupe SEB USA and Meyer in the case, sent over a press release. “Claiming to be a smaller company is no defense to false advertising—all companies large and small have the same rights and obligations under federal and state false advertising laws,” Zarlenga said in the release.The lawsuit is the latest attack on anti-PFAS advocacy by two of the largest companies in the global cookware industry. In 2024, as more than two dozen state legislatures weighed bans on consumer products with PFAS in them, Groupe SEB, the parent company of Groupe SEB USA, and Meyer formed the Cookware Sustainability Alliance, an advocacy group for the industry. That group has actively opposed bans, including signing letters and testifying in statehouses.Last fall, facing a bill in the California legislature to ban consumer products containing PFAS, celebrity chefs, including Rachael Ray, Marcus Samuelsson, and David Chang sent letters to the legislature opposing the bill. (Ray and Chang have cookware lines affiliated with Meyer, while Samuelsson serves as a “chef partner” for All-Clad, which is owned by Groupe SEB. WIRED sought comment from All Clad, Ray, Samuelsson, and Chang. All four did not respond.) The bill ultimately passed the legislature but was vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom.“The Cookware Sustainability Alliance focuses on state-level advocacy to protect perfectly safe cookware from being swept into overly broad PFAS product bans,” the group’s president, Steve Burns, told WIRED in an email. “We are not a party to any lawsuit at this point.”Last year, the Cookware Sustainability Alliance challenged claims made by Caraway through the National Advertising Division (NAD), an independent nonprofit that is often linked with the Better Business Bureau National Programs that self-polices the ad industry. The alliance challenged some of the claims in Caraway’s advertising around PFAS.The NAD ruled that Caraway could continue to advertise its products as “nontoxic” and “PFAS-free,” but it should avoid specific claims in its advertising, including that other nonstick cookware “can release toxins into your food and home during ordinary, manufacturer-recommended use.”Caraway, the February lawsuit alleges, continued to use that messaging despite the NAD decision. The company says that most examples of advertising highlighted in the lawsuit simply state that its products are nontoxic and that it fully complied with the NAD’s recommendations. But the suit also claims that Caraway “has not taken down many of the relevant advertisements.” In a memo to support a dismissal motion, Caraway alleged the NAD did not provide “any factual support whatsoever to the element of consumer deception.”Products from some lines owned by both Groupe SEB and Meyer—including some Rachael Ray products—are advertised as “PFAS-free” or “toxin-free.” When asked about products sold by both companies that contain claims about PFAS, Zarlenga sent over an example of a Caraway ad from the lawsuit featuring language that he claims goes against the NAD ruling and imagery labeling a generic nonstick pan as “Toxic Cookware.”“This ad and others like it are a far cry from simply stating that a product is toxin-free,” Zarlenga said. “Under the circumstances, it should be no surprise that producers of traditional nonstick cookware are taking steps to correct misinformation about their products in the courts and in a small number of state legislatures.”Jordan Nathan, the founder of Caraway, alleges this and some of the ads in the complaint using outdated messaging were displayed as a result of tech glitches and are no longer part of the company’s materials.“A number of the examples within the complaint are actually in compliance with the NAD,” Nathan claims. “The tricky thing is that we’re allowed to say we’re nontoxic, because we don’t have PFAS. A lot of the ads and content you’ll see today speak toward Caraway itself versus running a comparison.”“Advertising law will typically allow opinions, what we call puffery, saying ‘my product is the best, my product is better, it's the favorite,’” says Michael Goodyear, an associate professor at New York Law School. However, he says, the law also aims to guard consumers against “statements being made as statements of fact,” especially if any of them are wrong or misleading.The case is set to proceed to trial. If it does, Goodyear says, the debate over the science could take center stage before a jury.“Where the rubber really seems to make the road in this case is, has PTFE ever caused any health issues when it’s used as coating for cookware?” he says. “It seems like there's a dispute about that.”PFAS are a class of thousands of different chemicals that have been used since the 1940s. Their components break down very slowly over time, which they can build up in the environment and the human body. Some of the most commonly used forever chemicals have been linked to a wide variety of health impacts, from cancers to reproductive issues to reduced immune response. Research has shown that around a third of Americans are exposed to forever chemicals in their drinking water, while nearly all US residents have some form of PFAS chemicals in their blood.After the health implications of some of these chemicals became public in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the industry phased out production of two of the most harmful types of PFAS, including the main chemicals used to make nonstick pans. Nonstick cookware is now largely made with PTFE, a different type of PFAS chemical. Group SEB and Meyer use it, and the lawsuit claims that it “is a fundamentally safe chemical.”Much of Caraway’s marketing before the NAD decision focused on how Nathan founded the company after getting sick with “Teflon flu,” a commonly used term for a health condition that is the result of breathing in fumes from heated forever chemicals. The Poison Control center reported more than 250 cases of suspected Teflon flu in consumers in 2023.The lawsuit argues that “under normal conditions,” cookware made with PTFE has “never been proven to pose any health risks or have any measurable risk of contaminating consumers’ food, homes, or bodies.” (PTFE pans have to reach very high temperatures in order to release toxins, a situation that the lawsuit describes as outside of how people normally cook their food.) The FDA has allowed some PFAS to be used for nonstick coating, but, as the NAD decision notes, the agency’s “rationale focuses only on the migration of PFAS to food and does not address the potential toxicity when the fumes are overheated.”As Groupe SEB and Meyer acknowledge in their complaint, different types of PFAS are still used to manufacture PTFE. This, says Courtney Carignan, an exposure scientist and environmental epidemiologist at the University of Michigan, can increase possible exposure for workers and the chance of the chemicals entering the air and water. (Teflon flu, Carignan says, was documented early on in workers exposed to fumes in factories.) However, Carignan says that for humans, there’s “surprisingly few studies on cookware PFAS emissions, migration to food, and consumer exposure.”CommentsBack to topTriangleYou Might Also LikeHow to find us: Add WIRED.com to your preferred sources in GoogleHow the Canvas hack threatened thousands of schoolsBig Story: I've covered robots for years—this one is eerily lifelikeOrbs, saucers, and flashes on the moon—here’s what’s in the UFO filesTake our survey: What does “home” mean to you?Molly Taft is a senior writer for WIRED, covering climate change, energy, and the environment. Previously, they were a reporter and editor at Drilled, an investigative climate multimedia reporting project. Before that, they wrote about climate change and technology for Gizmodo, and served as a contributing editor for the New ... Read MoreSenior Writer, ClimateTopicskitchencookingchemicalshealthCookwareRead MoreSpencer Pratt Is Creating Panic Over ‘Super Meth.’ It’s Not Even RealThe LA mayoral candidate and former reality TV star is fueling his campaign with fears about an ultra-potent meth. Experts say it’s drug war propaganda.Miles KleeTrump Wants to Be the Hero Vapers Don’t Really NeedThe White House says Trump’s pro-vape stance is based on “gold standard science.” It feels more like vice-signaling to a demographic that often doesn’t vote—over products that are widely available.Jamie DucharmeVenom and Hot Peppers Offer a Key to Killing Resistant BacteriaResearchers have developed three new antibiotics from scorpion venom and habanero peppers to combat tuberculosis and other drug-resistant pathogens.Fernanda GonzálezHow Wet Weather in Argentina Helped Fuel the Cruise Ship Hantavirus OutbreakClimate change is helping create conditions that are driving the rodent boom—dubbed a ratada—in Argentina.María de los Ángeles OrfilaInside the Race to Develop a Test for the Rare Andes HantavirusA University of Nebraska lab has developed a test that can detect the virus before symptoms become severe. Now, it's ready to start testing those returning to the US after a cruise outbreak.Emily MullinTesting for ‘Bad Cholesterol’ Doesn’t Tell the Whole StoryThere’s a more accurate way of measuring who’s at risk for cholesterol-related health issues. So why don’t more doctors use it?Anna McKieUS Law Enforcement Warns of ‘Anti-Tech Extremism’ as AI Hatred GrowsAs Americans stew over the looming risk of job-stealing AI and data centers in their back yards, the feds are raising the alarm about a new category of threat, documents obtained by WIRED show.Daniel BoguslawThe FBI Wants ‘Near Real-Time’ Access to US License Plate ReadersPlus: Google publishes a live exploit for an unpatched flaw, the feds arrest two men accused of creating thousands of nonconsensual deepfake nudes, and more.Matt BurgessYou Can Get Some of Your Nudes Removed From the Internet Under a New LawStarting May 19, tech platforms in the US will have to comply with the Take It Down Act. Here’s how more than a dozen major platforms are handling takedown demands for your nonconsensual nudes.Maddy VarnerHantavirus Conspiracy Theories Are Already Spreading OnlineFrom claims of an Israeli false flag to efforts to sell ivermectin, influencers and grifters are using lessons learned from Covid-19 to push their baseless conspiracy theories.David GilbertScience Has Found Even More Ways Coffee Is Good for YouA new study shows the mechanisms of how coffee modifies the microbiome, reduces inflammation, and influences mood. Even decaf has its perks.Javier CarbajalxAI Adds 19 New Gas Turbines Despite Ongoing LawsuitEmails show that Elon Musk’s company is expanding its use of portable gas-fired power at its Colossus 2 site as a fight over air quality continues.Molly TaftWIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersLivestreamsTravelFAQWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesWearablesCouponsGift GuidesAdvertiseContact UsManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

A significant legal and public relations conflict is unfolding within the cookware industry centered on claims regarding per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), commonly known as forever chemicals. This dispute involves the cookware company Caraway alleging that larger entities, referred to as "Big Cookware," are utilizing lawsuits to suppress its marketing, which promotes its products as free of toxic chemicals. Groupe SEB USA and Meyer filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of New York, asserting that Caraway's marketing of forever chemicals is detrimental to the industry as a whole because it is not based on scientific fact and has caused harm to consumers and other market participants.

The legal challenge highlights a tension between corporate advertising claims and scientific evidence. The lawsuit posits that marketing surrounding PFAS is unsubstantiated, while Caraway contends that its advertising, particularly in relation to nonstick cookware, remains largely factual, often stating that its products are nontoxic and comply with recommendations from the National Advertising Division (NAD). The NAD had previously ruled that Caraway could continue advertising its products as "nontoxic" and "PFAS-free" but cautioned against specific claims about other nonstick cookware releasing toxins into the home during normal use. The dispute over the validity of these advertising statements is complex, touching upon the legal distinction between permissible opinion or puffery—such as stating a product is the "best"—and statements presented as verifiable facts, especially concerning potential health risks.

This conflict occurs against a backdrop of broader industry advocacy and regulatory efforts. In 2024, in response to growing public concern, Groupe SEB and Meyer formed the Cookware Sustainability Alliance, an advocacy group dedicated to protecting cookware from broad PFAS bans. This alliance actively opposed such bans through public testimony and letters to state legislatures. This effort involved challenging Caraway's claims via the NAD, which the alliance also undertook. Furthermore, celebrity chefs, including Rachael Ray, Marcus Samuelsson, and David Chang, engaged in state-level advocacy against PFAS bans, although one bill was vetoed by the California governor.

The core scientific debate centers on the safety of materials like Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), a type of PFAS, used in nonstick coatings. The lawsuit claims that PTFE is fundamentally safe under normal cooking conditions, arguing that toxins are not released unless cookware reaches extreme temperatures, which is outside typical usage. However, exposure scientists note that different types of PFAS are used in the manufacture of PTFE, which introduces complexities regarding potential exposure risks for workers and the environment. While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) permits the use of some PFAS for nonstick coatings, the rationale focuses only on migration to food, neglecting potential toxicity from overheated fumes, a point raised by exposure scientist Courtney Carignan.

The controversy is further complicated by the history of PFAS use and public awareness. PFAS have been in use since the 1940s, and their components persist in the environment and the human body, linked to various health outcomes. Despite public concerns, the industry transitioned to PTFE for nonstick materials following earlier health scares, such as those related to "Teflon flu." The legal proceeding is set to move toward trial, where the scientific debate over the actual health risks posed by PTFE and PFAS may become a central focus for the jury.