Baby Monitor Brand Owlet Cut Back On Search – And Sales Didn’t Drop | AdExchanger
image/svg+xml:
Topics Latest Marketers Agencies Publishers Technology Platforms Identity Measurement Data Privacy Artificial Intelligence CTV Commerce AdExplainer Exclusive Report Daily News Roundup
Opinion All Columns Data-Driven Thinking On TV & Video The Sell Sider Content Studio Comic Contributor Guidelines
About Us Advertise Newsletter AdExchanger Advisory Board About Us Contact Us
Events Programmatic AI Las Vegas Programmatic I/O 2026 AdExchanger Awards Webinars All Events Network Events
Podcasts AdExchanger Talks The Big Story Inside the Stack
Programmatic AI
Programmatic I/O
Become an AdHero
Subscribe
Sign In
Sign In
Topics Latest Marketers Agencies Publishers Technology Platforms Identity Measurement Data Privacy Artificial Intelligence CTV Commerce AdExplainer Exclusive Report Daily News Roundup Opinion All Columns Data-Driven Thinking On TV & Video The Sell Sider Content Studio Comic Contributor Guidelines Events & Awards Programmatic AI Las Vegas Programmatic I/O 2026 AdExchanger Awards Webinars All Events Network Events Podcasts AdExchanger Talks The Big Story Inside the Stack Subscribe Free Sign Up About Us Advertise Newsletter AdExchanger Advisory Board About Us Contact Us CONNECT
Home Marketers Baby Monitor Brand Owlet Cut Back On Search – And Sales Didn’t Drop
Marketers Baby Monitor Brand Owlet Cut Back On Search – And Sales Didn’t Drop By Allison Schiff
Wednesday, May 27th, 2026 – 1:00 am SHARE:
An interview with Liz Teran Chief Parent Officer
Owlet’s target customer isn’t in market for very long. The publicly traded baby tech company is best known for its smart “sock,” a wearable that wraps around an infant’s foot to track heart rate, oxygen levels, movement and sleep, and then sends alerts to a parent’s phone. Owlet also sells a Wi-Fi baby monitor and a bundle with both devices. The challenge for Owlet is that most people only research baby monitors from the second trimester through the first few months after birth, and they’re usually picturing a camera when they do. A lot of discovery also happens through word of mouth, which is powerful but hard to measure. This combination – a short buying window and a product that doesn’t fit the typical idea of a baby monitor – forces Liz Teran, Owlet’s chief parent officer, to be very specific about how she approaches performance marketing.
And that’s before you factor in medical device regulations. Owlet had been selling its smart sock as a wellness product since it launched in 2015. But in 2021, the FDA decided it should be regulated as a medical device and ordered the company to stop selling the product until it got medical clearance. The next two years were tough. “Getting FDA clearance is expensive,” Teran said, “and so the largest part of our budget – marketing – had to be cut.” In the past, Owlet would spend hundreds of thousands of dollars across paid search and social, almost as a reflex. But the cuts forced Teran’s team to rethink its approach, including shutting off Google Search. It was a decision made under duress, but they learned something surprising and valuable. “We did see quite a big drop in traffic, but it wasn’t qualified traffic,” Teran said. “In other words, we were still performing well even though we lost a good chunk of what we now understand was not qualified traffic.” Teran spoke with AdExchanger. AdExchanger: Last year, your title changed from CMO to “chief parent officer.” Did your job responsibilities change, too? LIZ TERAN: My background is in product marketing, so I’ve always been both a marketer and a product person. Last year, when our founder was transitioning out, we were also making other broader org changes, but we wanted to make sure we stayed really focused on parents and their needs. We stitched product management, design, customer service and marketing together into what we call the “parent org” so that every discipline is focused on serving parents and communicating in a way that resonates. The title is meant to reflect that focus. Can you share an example of how that “parent org” approach has impacted a product or marketing decision? The best example is Owlet360, which is a subscription service we launched last January. It unlocks more value from the data we already collect, like daily and weekly trends on heart rate, oxygen, movement and skin temperature. There was pressure to generate recurring revenue quickly, and one obvious idea was to take certain existing features and put them behind a paywall. That would have been fast, but it would also have broken trust with parents. Instead, we ask parents what other things would be valuable to them and built against that. Because we listened, the subscription product is performing well. We ended last year with over 100,000 subscribers. Since Owlet was founded in 2012, you’ve monitored more than 2.5 million babies with your tech, which means you’ve collected – and continue to collect – quite a lot of infant health data. What are your guardrails? Health data involving kids is about as sensitive as it gets! Today, most of the data is used to make the product experience better, helping parents answer the question “Is this or that normal?” with more confidence by showing patterns and benchmarks based on babies of the same age. Because we’re a medical device company, there are a lot of regulatory considerations around how we share that information and what we can say about it, and we’re very careful. Longer term, there’s real potential for this data to contribute to better outcomes in infant and child health more broadly. We already have an internal data science team exploring what’s possible, but anything beyond the product experience has to go through the right medical and regulatory pathways. Your target audience is narrow and time‑bound. How do you think about targeting and acquisition? Our TAM is constantly refreshing. We basically have a six- to nine-month window to reach someone, and then they age out. The good news is that the product does what it promises, and parents talk about it. More than half of our customers say they first heard about Owlet from a friend or family member. We don’t really need a big paid influencer program or anything like that, because regular parents are already recommending us to everyone they know who’s pregnant. The job of paid media is to reinforce that with real parent stories and creator content, so that when someone is in that research window, Owlet is already in the mix. After the FDA warning, you guys had to cut acquisition costs dramatically and even turned off Google Search, which actually turned out to be a good thing, even though it hurt at the time. What did you learn? It forced us to question a lot of assumptions. Before the cuts, we were following what you’d consider a pretty standard growth playbook: CTV, paid social, search. And if you looked at the blended performance, the numbers were acceptable. But when you don’t have the budget anymore, “acceptable” isn’t good enough. You have to ask, “What, specifically, is this channel doing for us?” When we turned off paid search for generic terms like “baby monitor,” it was eye-opening. It made it really clear that a lot of people searching “baby monitor” just wanted a camera, and when they landed on our site and saw a sock, that wasn’t what they were thinking of. We were essentially paying for that disconnect. Does that mean you don’t spend on search anymore? For the record, we do paid search again now, but our strategy has shifted. Our takeaway wasn’t “search is bad.” It was that not all search is equal. Now we think more about intent. What is a person actually looking for and where are they in their journey? Thinking this way has changed how we use search and how we evaluate every channel. We’re not ticking boxes and we’re less interested in what’s considered “best practice.” We’re just trying to focus on what actually works for our funnel and our customers. This interview has been lightly edited and condensed.
Tagged in:
FDA
// google search
// health data
// Owlet
// Parent Advertising
Next In Marketers
Pirated Sports Streams Are Warping TV’s Most Important Ratings
Must Read
CTV Why Critics Say Email-Based IDs Don’t Work For CTV
Many CTV buyers and sellers aren’t convinced email targeting makes sense in a media channel that doesn’t prioritize one-to-one ad personalization. They also worry FAST channels are creating email-based IDs using data from third parties.
PODCAST: AdExchanger Talks How ‘Wrapped’ Insights Become Audience Segments
How does Spotify translate quirky Wrapped labels, like “divorced dad hipster,” into ad audiences? And is AI-generated content safe for brands? Spotify’s Global Head of Ad Product Katie English weighs in.
Marketers Pirated Sports Streams Are Warping TV’s Most Important Ratings
Although tides of ad revenue flow based on the ratings of certain tentpole TV events, a new crop of scammers now operate illicit sports livestreaming rings, and there’s almost nothing broadcasters can do about it.
CTV roundup AI Is Redefining Premium Content – Which May Not Be A Good Thing
At AdExchanger’s Programmatic AI conference, media experts discussed how the rise of AI-generated content is changing the industry’s understanding of “premium” content.
PODCAST: The Big Story Prog AI Live: AI’s Slippery Slop
Recorded live in Las Vegas at Prog AI, the AdExchanger team tackles a tricky question: As AI floods the feed with chaotic, addictive content and people engage with it, what does “premium” even mean anymore?
AdExplainer The Programmatic Auction Is Changing In Real Time – Here’s How
Two decades after the first RTB auction, programmatic is more complex than ever – and that’s before you even consider generative AI.
Popular
AdExplainer The Programmatic Auction Is Changing In Real Time – Here’s How
Two decades after the first RTB auction, programmatic is more complex than ever – and that’s before you even consider generative AI.
AI AI Needs Humans In The Lead, Not Just In The Loop, Says JPMorgan Chase Programmatic Lead
Automation has its place, but good marketing still needs “heart and science,” according to JPMorgan Chase’s Melissa Bonnick. Humans aren’t going anywhere.
CTV roundup AI Is Redefining Premium Content – Which May Not Be A Good Thing
At AdExchanger’s Programmatic AI conference, media experts discussed how the rise of AI-generated content is changing the industry’s understanding of “premium” content.
Marketers Pirated Sports Streams Are Warping TV’s Most Important Ratings
Although tides of ad revenue flow based on the ratings of certain tentpole TV events, a new crop of scammers now operate illicit sports livestreaming rings, and there’s almost nothing broadcasters can do about it.
AI These AI Agents Want To Handle All The Annoying Parts Of Media Buying
Meet Kovva, a new AI ad tech startup tackling the unglamorous gruntwork that programmatic has never fully automated.
Join the AdExchanger Community Join Now
Your trusted source for in-depth programmatic news, views, education and events. AdExchanger is where marketers, agencies, publishers and tech companies go for the latest information on the trends that are transforming digital media and marketing, from data, privacy, identity and AI to commerce, CTV, measurement and mobile.
NEXT EVENT Programmatic AI May 18-20, 2026Park MGM, Las Vegas Learn More
ABOUT ADEXCHANGER About Us Advertise Contact Us Events Subscribe RSS Cookie Settings Privacy & Terms Accessibility Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging
CONNECT
© 2026 Access Intelligence, LLC - All Rights Reserved |
The challenges faced by the publicly traded baby technology company Owlet, as discussed by Chief Parent Officer Liz Teran, revolve around understanding the narrow, often short, buying window for their target customers and navigating stringent medical device regulations. Owlet’s core product is a smart wearable, the smart sock, which tracks infant vital signs, differentiating it from the conventional perception of a baby monitor. This context necessitates a highly specific approach to performance marketing, especially when balancing product delivery with regulatory compliance.
A significant hurdle for Owlet involved the FDA decision in 2021 to regulate the smart sock as a medical device, which required halting sales until clearance was obtained. This regulatory necessity caused substantial budget reductions, forcing Teran’s team to reassess their marketing strategy. This shift included eliminating paid search efforts, particularly on Google Search, which reflects a fundamental reconsideration of acquisition methods. Although there was a noticeable drop in traffic, Teran observed that the lost traffic was not qualified, meaning the marketing expenditures were not delivering high-quality leads.
In response to these constraints, Teran emphasized the need to dismantle previous assumptions about growth playbooks. Before the budget cuts, the company operated under a standard model involving paid search, social media, and connected television. However, the reduction in resources prompted a critical focus on channel intent rather than simply adhering to perceived best practices. When paid search for generic terms like “baby monitor” was discontinued, the experience revealed that many searchers were primarily seeking a camera, highlighting a disconnect between consumer intent and Owlet’s actual product offering. Consequently, the shift involved prioritizing understanding the consumer's journey and intent over broad channel metrics.
To foster a more cohesive and customer-centric approach, Teran championed the creation of a “parent org.” This organizational structure integrated product management, design, customer service, and marketing functions to ensure all disciplines were focused on serving parents and communicating in a resonant manner. This holistic approach guided crucial product and marketing decisions, exemplified by the success of the Owlet360 subscription service. Instead of attempting to immediately monetize existing features, the team listened to parents to determine what additional value they sought, leading to the development of a subscription model based on daily and weekly health trends. This strategy successfully generated recurring revenue, achieving over one hundred thousand subscribers, demonstrating that building value based on user needs is more effective than imposing features behind a paywall.
Owlet manages a considerable volume of sensitive infant health data, which necessitates careful consideration of regulatory guardrails regarding data sharing and communication. The current use of this data is primarily focused on enhancing the product experience by providing parents with context, helping them assess whether observed patterns are normal for a baby of a certain age. While the company explores the long-term potential of this data for broader infant and child health outcomes, any use beyond the direct product experience must navigate complex medical and regulatory pathways. Furthermore, the acquisition strategy leverages organic parental recommendations rather than large-scale paid influencer programs, relying on the existing trust parents place in one another. Ultimately, the experience underscores that effective marketing success in regulated, data-sensitive sectors depends on deeply understanding user intent, maintaining strict regulatory oversight, and fostering a mission-driven organizational structure. |