New Moms Are Returning to Coding Jobs Radically Reshaped by AI | WIREDSkip to main contentMenuSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuAccountAccountNewslettersSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoLivestreamsMerchSearchSearchJoel KhaliliBusinessMay 28, 2026 7:00 AMNew Moms Are Returning to Coding Jobs Radically Reshaped by AINew mothers working in software development are staring down an AI-pilled workplace they barely recognize.Photo-Illustration: Jobanny Cabrera; Getty ImagesCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyAs Danielle settled into the rhythms of new motherhood, her profession underwent a drastic reinvention.Danielle, who asked to use her first name to avoid damaging her job prospects, worked as a software developer at a car company in Portland, Oregon. Before she left the workforce in mid-2024, barely anybody used AI to write code; by the time she was ready to return, a year later, it had become the expectation. Once upon a time, she had been drawn to coding for the job security it offered, but AI was threatening to upend that. “The skills that I had learned—rote development skills—we are now expected to outsource to AI,” Danielle says.The world’s largest AI companies anticipate a future where pretty much everything is “vibe-coded.” In April, Mark Zuckerberg predicted that AI will write most of Meta’s code within the next 18 months. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently told WIRED he expects AI coding to become “one of these rare multitrillion-dollar markets.”The dizzying pace of change has touched software engineers across the industry. But the effects are particularly acute for new mothers who, by a fluke of timing, happened to be away from their desks when the shift was taking place.“The kind of work I was doing before, I would like to do again. I think I was good at it,” says Danielle. “But I recognize that job will never exist again.”The executives in charge of the largest AI labs have warned that the technology could wipe out white-collar jobs, from law to finance to consulting to sales. But few industries have been carved up in the same way as software development.With the release of coding automation tools by Anthropic and OpenAI in May 2025, the field became less about composition and more about babysitting. Learning this new way of working isn’t overly complicated, but new mothers face falling behind colleagues who have benefited from a headstart.A UK project manager currently on maternity leave tells WIRED her manager suggested that she brush up on AI while she’s out. “It made me feel very vulnerable,” says the woman, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation by her employer, a development agency. Before she left, staff used AI on an ad hoc basis, typically for small tasks like auto-completing lines of human-written code. But the agency is eager for AI to play a larger role, she says.“The likelihood of me spending my statutory maternity pay on an AI course … is slim to none,” she says. “This is not something I should be spending my maternity leave doing.” But she worries that falling behind might make her a target for layoffs.Mary McCreary, a data engineer working at a US-based health tech company, says her employer helped her acclimate to new AI tools when she returned to work. Initially skeptical of AI, McCreary came to appreciate its ability to explain the function of her coworkers’ code. “The thing that I hate most about being an engineer is having to review other people’s code,” she says.But the technology has nonetheless changed the nature of the work. “The downside is that I don’t get any time to do tedious tasks that would be not a lot of effort for my brain,” says McCreary. “I’m always looking at hard problems, because I’ve offloaded all of the tedium.”Another software engineer, who lives in Minnesota and works at a marketing software company, tells WIRED that AI coding tools helped her to keep pace with colleagues in the face of fatigue and other postpartum symptoms. “I definitely was not ready to return,” says the engineer, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about her company’s use of AI. “Your body is filled with all these hormones and your brain changes to the point that all you can fixate on is that child.” The ability to offload tasks that require deep and sustained concentration—like debugging code—to AI “was incredibly helpful,” she says.When she initially returned from maternity leave, in September 2024, her company was mostly using AI tools as a sort of glorified version of the code troubleshooting forum Stack Overflow. But a year later, all code changes were being fed through AI models to check for errors. Then AI began to take up the bulk of the coding work; the company started to keep a leaderboard that ranked engineers by how much they used it. “It’s like, instead of being a software engineer, I’m more like a puppet master,” she says.By November 2025—with the release of Claude Opus 4.5, a recent iteration of Anthropic’s flagship AI model—coding tools had advanced even further. “Opus was, like, holy shit,” she says. “I did a quarter’s worth of work [for a team of developers] just by myself. It was quick and dirty, but it got the job done.” She began to worry that her role could soon be automated out of existence.Software engineers looking for a new job, meanwhile, are finding that AI has reconfigured the job market.Three months before she gave birth to her daughter, Danielle was laid off. When she began to apply for new software roles last year, she found that most postings required candidates to have some degree of AI knowledge, but rarely specified how they would be expected to use it. “The ambiguity was nerve-wracking,” she says. “I didn’t know how to investigate what skill I was missing.”Women looking for a new job after an extended maternity can come up against an unwillingness among employers to accommodate caring responsibilities, misconceptions about their commitment to their jobs, and other structural issues, experts say. “The system treats it as an exit, not a pause. It’s a design failure,” says Daniela Gulie, who leads the German arm of the nonprofit Bring Women Back to Work. But in software, AI has compounded those problems, creating an AI-literacy gap between mothers and their colleagues, and warping the labor market to their detriment. “It’s yet another way in which women are being screwed over,” says Rachel Grocott, CEO at UK-based think tank Pregnant Then Screwed. “You’re layering disadvantage on inequality.”Danielle hasn’t come close to finding a new job; only one of the 40 applications she sent out progressed to an interview. Others shared similar impressions of a cutthroat job market, in which a glut of overqualified candidates are competing for junior and mid-level software engineering jobs. “There’s this huge, huge pool of incredibly smart and talented people that you don’t want to be a part of,” says the Minnesota engineer.To try to bring herself up to speed, Danielle plans to start coding up small hobby projects alongside AI. But the rate of change has left her wondering whether it’s worth investing in learning the technology. “Every day, I am getting even further removed,” she says. “It’s really a terrifying moment to feel like I don’t understand the future of this industry.”The perceived risk of being left behind during a maternity absence, or being displaced by AI, is also coloring career and family planning decisions.The Minnesota engineer says she is torn between a desire to fight to keep her hard-won career and the pull of motherhood. “I’m trying to figure out, do I want to be a mother to a second child?” she says. “I want to be a present parent and actually be there for my child. But I’m scared to have one. It’s very complicated.”Initially attracted to the software industry for its job security, some women are considering looking for a different career entirely—one less immediately vulnerable to automation. Danielle wonders what it might be like to spend less time behind a computer; she is considering pursuing a qualification in landscape architecture. “I don’t derive meaning from training artificial intelligence, or just fixing code generated by artificial intelligence,” she says. “If that is the future of this industry, is that a job I want?”CommentsBack to topTriangleYou Might Also LikeHow to find us: Add WIRED.com to your preferred sources in GoogleUsing AI for just 10 minutes could make you lazy and dumbBig Story: He couldn’t land a job interview—was AI to blame?Tesla says wheels may fall off CybertrucksLivestream: Submit your questions about how AI is transforming workJoel Khalili is a senior writer at WIRED, covering the artificial intelligence industry in Europe. He previously covered cryptocurrency extensively and was named one of the Professional Publishers Association’s 2024 most exciting rising stars in UK publishing. Before joining WIRED, he was an editor at TechRadar, where he wrote about ... Read MoreSenior WriterTopicsparentingkidstechnologySilicon ValleyUKartificial intelligenceRead MoreMira Murati Wants Her AI to ‘Keep Humans in the Loop’The Thinking Machines Lab founder and former CTO of OpenAI tells WIRED she isn’t interested in automating people out of jobs. Instead, she’s building AI that can collaborate.Will KnightFormer Google and Apple Researchers Launch a Startup to Build AI’s Missing Feedback LoopTrajectory is betting the rapid iteration cycle that supercharged vibe-coding can help all kinds of companies build AI products that learn continuously.Maxwell ZeffGreg Brockman Officially Takes Control of OpenAI’s Products in Latest Shake-UpOpenAI is once again reorganizing its executive ranks as part of its effort to unify ChatGPT and Codex into one core product experience.Maxwell ZeffDemis Hassabis Thinks AI Job Cuts Are DumbThe CEO of Google DeepMind tells WIRED that companies should use the productivity gains of AI to do more, not lay people off.Will KnightUsing AI for Just 10 Minutes Might Make You Lazy and Dumb, Study ShowsNew research suggests that reliance on AI assistants can have a negative impact on people’s ability to think and problem solve.Will KnightFormer OpenAI Staffers Warn That xAI’s Poor Safety Record Could Complicate SpaceX’s IPOThe ex-employees, who cofounded a new AI watchdog group, say investors deserve more information about xAI’s safety practices before SpaceX goes public.Maxwell ZeffWhat Microsoft Executives Really Thought About OpenAI in 2018Leaders at the tech giant were skeptical of OpenAI—but wary of pushing it into the arms of Amazon, according to evidence revealed during the Musk v. Altman trial.Maxwell ZeffMeta’s New Reality: Record High Profits. Record Low MoraleNext week, Meta is cutting about 10 percent of its staff. WIRED spoke with more than a dozen current and former employees about what it's like inside a company where “everyone is unhappy.”Steven LevyCompanies Keep Slashing Employees’ Benefits for the Worst ReasonsWorkers are getting worse health care, parental leave, and retirement benefits, showing once and for all that your job doesn’t love you back.Lauren GoodeThere’s a Long-Shot Proposal to Protect California Workers From AICalifornia gubernatorial candidate Tom Steyer is proposing a new jobs guarantee for workers displaced by artificial intelligence.Makena KellyElon Musk Seemingly Admits xAI Has Used OpenAI’s Models to Train Its OwnWhile answering questions under oath, Musk argued it’s standard practice for AI labs to use their competitors’ models.Maxwell ZeffI've Covered Robots for Years. This One Is DifferentFrom sorting chicken nuggets to screwing in lightbulbs, Eka’s robotic claw feels like we're approaching a ChatGPT moment for the physical world.Will KnightWIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersLivestreamsTravelFAQWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesWearablesCouponsGift GuidesAdvertiseContact UsManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

New mothers reentering the workforce are navigating a landscape in software development that has been radically reshaped by artificial intelligence, creating significant professional and societal challenges. The experience of returning to work, especially after maternity leave, is compounded by the rapid integration of AI tools, which introduces a new expectation that prior rote development skills can be outsourced to artificial intelligence. This shift is influenced by predictions from major AI entities, such as Mark Zuckerberg's assertion that AI could write most of Meta's code, and Sam Altman’s view of AI coding as a potential multitrillion-dollar market.

This technological evolution has created a sense of vulnerability among software engineers. Those who left the workforce and returned found that the expected skill set is now shifting toward AI utilization. While some, like Danielle, felt capable in traditional coding, they recognize that those specific roles may no longer exist in the same form. The release of coding automation tools by organizations like Anthropic and OpenAI in May 2025 formalized this transition, altering the nature of engineering work from composition to oversight and monitoring.

The effects of this change are acutely felt by new mothers, who often face the pressure to keep pace with colleagues who have leveraged these advancements. A UK project manager on maternity leave expressed feeling vulnerable regarding the need to upskill in AI while absent, fearing falling behind and potentially facing layoffs. Although some considered spending statutory maternity pay on AI courses impractical, the fear of displacement remains a powerful motivator.

The integration of AI has altered the day-to-day nature of engineering work. Data engineer Mary McCreary, initially skeptical of AI, found utility in its ability to handle tedious tasks, such as reviewing code, allowing her to focus her considerable cognitive effort on complex problems rather than rote tasks. Similarly, another software engineer found that offloading tasks requiring deep, sustained concentration, such as debugging code, to AI was beneficial, especially during postpartum periods. As AI tools evolved, advanced models like Claude Opus 4.5 demonstrated an ability to generate substantial work by the user, leading some engineers to worry about the eventual automation of their roles.

The broader labor market also reflects these changes, exhibiting an AI-literacy gap between mothers and their colleagues, which experts argue layers disadvantage onto existing inequalities. Concerns persist regarding employer unwillingness to accommodate caregiving responsibilities, which specialists note treats maternity leave as an exit rather than a pause, thus exacerbating existing systemic issues. Furthermore, job seekers encountering this market find that many software roles now implicitly require AI knowledge, creating a competitive environment where a large pool of highly talented candidates competes for positions, often impacting those with established careers.

This confluence of technological change and personal life forces individuals to reevaluate career trajectories. Some are considering an entirely different career path, such as landscape architecture, reflecting a desire to avoid professions centered on training artificial intelligence or directly fixing AI-generated code. The perceived risk of being left behind or displaced by automation influences decisions regarding career and family planning, creating a complicated tension between professional ambition and the desire to be a present parent.