LmCast :: Stay tuned in

Bot Company allegedly trashing Airbnb rentals with their prototype robots

Recorded: May 29, 2026, 12:03 a.m.

Original Summarized

ADVERTISEMENTSkip to main contentOpen search bar and full menuThe San Francisco StandardLatestNewsPoliticsBusinessOpinionCultureFood & DrinkSportsGamesPodcastsClose menuClose menuSign outSearch querySearchLatestObsessionsNewsPoliticsBusinessOpinionCultureFood & DrinkSportsMobile App (opens in new tab)NewslettersPodcastsGamesSocial Links (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab)NewsA SF startup is secretly testing robots in Airbnbs, and trashing them, lawsuit claimsThe guests behind the bookings have received negative reviews from a number of Bay Area hosts, alleging they damaged the property and personal belongings.San Francisco resident Sean Donovan alleges that employees of the Bot Company rented his home to conduct testing on robots they’re training to do household chores. | Source: Courtesy Sean DonovanBy Stephanie K. BaerDeputy News EditorPublished May 28, 2026at3:48pmShareShareCopy linkto this articleEmailTwitter (opens in new tab)Bluesky (opens in new tab)Facebook (opens in new tab)LinkedIn (opens in new tab)Telegram (opens in new tab)WhatsApp (opens in new tab)Reddit (opens in new tab)Close share menuThere are $0 comments on this storyPublished May 28, 2026at3:48pmThe reservation request didn’t seem out of the ordinary: Eight colleagues visiting the Bay Area for work were looking for an Airbnb with reliable Wi-Fi.But at check-in time April 12, a Ring camera captured footage of people moving large, black cases into Sean Donovan’s home in San Francisco. Later that night, the security system was shut off.Two days later, Donovan stopped by the house to take out the trash. He looked through a window and saw black cables taped to the walls. A man was typing on a laptop sitting next to what appeared to be a robot.ADVERTISEMENTWhen his guests checked out 11 days later, the house was a mess, Donovan claims. Glasses and dishes had been removed from kitchen cabinets and left elsewhere. The dishwasher, refrigerator, and washing machine were scratched. Dishwasher racks were bent and removed. Wooden furniture was scratched and stained. Bathroom tiles were chipped. A shoe rack and several pairs of shoes were missing from a locked bedroom closet.“What the hell is going on here?” Donovan recalled thinking.After scouring the damage and conducting a bit of online sleuthing, he thinks he figured it out. In a lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court Tuesday, Donovan alleges that employees of the Bot Company (opens in new tab) rented his home “under false pretenses” to conduct prototype testing on robots they’re training to do household chores. Founded by alums of Tesla and the autonomous vehicle company Cruise, the San Francisco startup has received hundreds of millions in venture capital funding and is valued at $2 billion (opens in new tab), according to the tech research platform Sacra. The Bot Company did not respond to requests for comment.Donovan is seeking $12,383.50 for damage to his home and belongings and for lost income he believes he would have received had the company correctly booked the property for commercial use. He is suing the Bot Company but not the individuals who rented the property.Through his own research, Donovan concluded that the guests at his home worked for the Bot Company. The Standard has been unable to verify their employment status. “The dishonesty is really what upsets me the most,” he said. “If they had come straight up, ‘Hey, we would like to rent your house for testing of our robot,’ then we could have come to an agreement. But it’s the lying and the misrepresentation that makes me feel violated.”It appears that he’s not the only Bay Area resident who has been duped.Three of the guests connected to the April 12-25 booking for Donovan’s home have received negative reviews from at least 12 other Airbnb hosts alleging they damaged the property and personal belongings, failed to clean up, exceeded the limit on the number of guests, or violated other house rules during their stays.Source: Screenshots AirbnbSource: Screenshots AirbnbThe owner of an 1896 Victorian in Ingleside told The Standard he rented his home to three of the guests linked to the booking at Donovan’s house. When he returned home after the group’s six-night stay in March, he said, there were scuff marks on the walls and nicked paint on doorframes. A refrigerator shelf was cracked, and a broken glass or dish had been left in the garbage disposal. A wooden nightstand drawer was chipped. Cups and plates were in the wrong places. It looked like the furniture had been moved around.“Sorry :( Did my best!” said a pithy message the group left on a whiteboard on his scuffed-up dining table. More aboutRobotBay Area robot wars are becoming dance battlesThe WaggleSFMOMA gets wild, Affleck and Damon hit the town, and a socialite dating their … cousin?“I just kind of assumed they might have had a party,” said the owner, who requested anonymity for privacy.But then a neighbor told him they had seen people bringing big black boxes into the house, so the owner thought maybe they had filmed a movie.“The robot thing kind of makes sense now,” the host said.A whiteboard left at an Airbnb in Ingleside apologizing for the mess. | Source: CourtesyHe spent a week cleaning and making repairs. He filed a claim with Airbnb for the damages, but the company rejected it, he said, citing his lack of before-and-after photos.The group of guests never responded to his message about the damage, he said.Have thoughts on this story?Start the conversationLike Donovan, the Ingleside homeowner said he would have been OK with a company renting his house to test robots had the employees been upfront about it.“If they’re trying to better the lives of humans with robots, I’m all for that,” he said. “I think there’s a good future in that, but they don’t need to be all sneaky about it.”Other negative reviews cited similar damage, though it’s unclear if these owners suspected there was a robotic culprit.“Most of my hardwood kitchen cabinets were scratched/gouged after their stay,” a host in Burlingame wrote on Airbnb in February. “There were also some black streaks on my walls and baseboards. During their stay, they brought multiple large plastic cases and boxes at various times which I suspect caused the damage.”Another February complaint came from a host in Foster City: “There was a lot of damage like significant deep scratches to the kitchen cabinets (like more than half of the kitchen), and nightstands, moved everything all over the place, and took some items.”Bot Company has not revealed a prototype. Its bare-bones website (opens in new tab) states that it is “building a helpful robot for every home” that can do “all the little things that eat away at our time.”A Ring camera at Donovan’s house captured footage of a mechanical device during the guests’ stay. | Source: Courtesy Sean DonovanSacra describes the Bot Company’s product as resembling “a low coffee table on wheels,” with “an articulated arm and dual grippers” that allow it to “pick up and organize household items autonomously.” The website says the company plans to market its robot to families as well as “short-term rental operators, elder care providers, and small office facility teams.”The irony is not lost on Donovan. “This company is trying to build robots to make Airbnb turnovers more easy,” Donovan said. “In the meantime, they are damaging Airbnb hosts’ houses.”He said he and his partner spent several days repairing the damage. A reimbursement request he submitted to the guests through Airbnb is unresolved. His shoes? Still missing.“I don’t know what will happen, and there are potential negative repercussions, but I also feel like what they’re doing is wrong,” Donovan said. “They’re doing it to lots of people, and they should stop and at least be honest with what they’re doing.”Copy link to this article (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab)Filed underAIAI Is Eating SFAirbnbCruiseNewsRobotMoreNewsLawsuit claims SF Fire Department hid violent history after Original Joe’s assaultDEVELOPINGMeasure to fund Muni with new tax gets enough signatures for November electionEXCLUSIVERetired dentist landlord arrested in fatal Sunset shootingWaymo’s new blue car is launching, but you can’t ride in it just yetByStephanie K. BaerSam Altman’s startup is hoping Jared Leto’s band will make you scan your eyeballA new tool helps artists stop bots from buying up concert tickets. Instead, it reserves spots for fans who are ‘human-verified’ by iris-scanning orbs.May 21, 2026·4:00pmUCSF maternity nurses say chronic understaffing is putting patients at riskNurses say the issues are causing delays in care for pregnant and postpartum patients at San Francisco’s highly regarded hospital.May 2, 2026·12:00amMost readtodayInvestigationSkeletons in the closet: Inside the unraveling of the California Academy of Sciences9 commentsSF nonprofits brace for 1,000 layoffs as Lurie eyes millions in budget cuts4 commentsThe Bay Area has plenty of beef. So why is great barbecue so hard to find?1 commentsKawakami: It’s time for a reasonable but aggressive Giants rebuild7 commentsEpic Church plans to purchase $15 million Union Square building1 commentsSocial Links (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab) (opens in new tab)Footer NavigationAbout UsStaffStandards & EthicsNewslettersMobile App (opens in new tab)Jobs (opens in new tab)Contact UsTipsAdvertisingSign InPaid SubscriptionSubscription FAQs© The San Francisco Standard. All Rights Reserved.Legal InformationTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyCalifornia Resident RightsPrivacy Center

A lawsuit has been filed alleging that employees of the Bot Company rented residential properties, including Sean Donovan's home in San Francisco, under false pretenses to conduct prototype testing on household robots designed to perform chores. The core of the dispute centers on the claim that the company misrepresented the purpose of the rentals, which subsequently led to significant damage to the hosts' properties and personal belongings. Donovan is seeking compensation for the damages incurred and lost income, suing the Bot Company rather than the individual renters.

The situation unfolded after guests checked out of Donovan's home, alleging extensive damage including scratched surfaces, chipped bathroom tiles, scratched wooden furniture, and missing items such as dishes, glasses, and shoe racks. Other Airbnb hosts in the Bay Area have reported similar issues, citing damage caused by large black boxes and plastic cases brought into their homes during stays, further suggesting a pattern of misconduct. For instance, an owner of an 1896 Victorian home reported scuff marks on walls, nicked paint on doorframes, and chipped refrigerator shelves following a group stay.

The Bot Company, a startup valued at two billion dollars, is founded by alumni of Tesla and Cruise, and focuses on developing autonomous robots intended to perform household tasks. The company describes its product as a system resembling a low coffee table on wheels featuring an articulated arm and dual grippers capable of autonomously picking up and organizing household items. The company markets its technology for various commercial applications, including short-term rental operators, elder care providers, and small office facilities.

The irony highlighted in the reporting is that the company is attempting to streamline Airbnb turnovers while simultaneously causing damage to the properties of the hosts. Donovan asserted that the dishonest misrepresentation regarding the use of the properties is the most upsetting aspect of the situation. Although Donovan attempted to pursue reimbursement through Airbnb, the claims were rejected by the platform due to a lack of before-and-after photographic evidence. This incident raises questions about the ethical boundaries of testing new technology in private residential spaces and the necessity for transparency between technology developers and property renters.