LmCast :: Stay tuned in

The most spectacular rocket explosion since N1 just happened in Florida

Recorded: May 29, 2026, 4 a.m.

Original Summarized

The most spectacular rocket explosion since N1 just happened in Florida - Ars Technica

Skip to content

Ars Technica home

Sections

Forum

Subscribe

Search

AI

Biz & IT

Cars

Culture

Gaming

Health

Policy

Science

Security

Space

Tech

Feature

Reviews

AI

Biz & IT

Cars

Culture

Gaming

Health

Policy

Science

Security

Space

Tech

Forum

Subscribe

Story text

Size

Small
Standard
Large

Width
*

Standard
Wide

Links

Standard
Orange

* Subscribers only
  Learn more

Pin to story

Theme

HyperLight

Day & Night

Dark

System

Search

Sign In

This is very, very bad

The most spectacular rocket explosion since N1 just happened in Florida

New Glenn was due to play a starring role in NASA’s Artemis Program.

Eric Berger


May 28, 2026 10:21 pm

|

98

Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket on the launch pad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida.


Credit:


Blue Origin

Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket on the launch pad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida.


Credit:


Blue Origin

Text
settings

Story text

Size

Small
Standard
Large

Width
*

Standard
Wide

Links

Standard
Orange

* Subscribers only
  Learn more

Minimize to nav

On Thursday evening Blue Origin attempted to test fire its massive New Glenn rocket at its Florida launch site, but something went very wrong after engine ignition. The super heavy lift rocket exploded in spectacular and disastrous fashion.
The static fire test was being filmed by NASASpaceflight.com on its Space Coast Live feed, which captured video of the conflagration that followed destruction of the booster. The first stage of New Glenn, fueled with methane, produced a massive fireball above the launch site along the Florida coast, LC-36A. It is possibly the most dramatic and powerful rocket explosion since the Soviet Union’s N1 rocket was destroyed during a launch attempt in 1969.

Blue Origin’s New Glenn just blew up at LC-36 while attempting to Static Fire ahead of NG-4.https://t.co/tANS0dWyIH pic.twitter.com/PztxFoBqIw
— NSF – NASASpaceflight.com (@NASASpaceflight) May 29, 2026

There was no immediate indication as to what caused the rocket to fail during the initial stages of the static fire test. The failure originated with the first stage of the rocket, which is powered by seven BE-4 engines. Sources said the problem appeared to start in the engine section of the vehicle.
“It’s too early to know the root cause but we’re already working to find it,” Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos said on X. “Very rough day, but we’ll rebuild whatever needs rebuilding and get back to flying. It’s worth it.”
No one was injured during the failure, which sources said caused extensive damage to the company’s large and complex launch site. During a pad failure in 2016, with the smaller Falcon 9 rocket, it took SpaceX more than a year to rebuild its seriously damaged Space Launch Complex-40 pad.
A true catastrophe
This is the worst disaster in the history of Blue Origin, founded in 2000.

The company has launched New Glenn three times, during each of which the first stage performed well. The company had already demonstrated the ability to land the New Glenn first stage, and impressively reused it in April for the first time.
During that third flight, carrying the Blue Bird 7 satellite, an upper stage issue caused the mission to fail. However the company responded rapidly to the in-flight failure and returned to the launch pad in less than two months this week. The first stage for this mission, nicknamed No, It’s Necessary, was making its debut launch.
Prior to this launch attempt Blue Origin had in its inventory two first stages and about six New Glenn upper stages completed, and it was poised to break into a monthly launch cadence. By all accounts, the rocket was viewed as a major success for a company which, for so long, had seemed to plod along. New Glenn’s success catapulted the company to the upper echelon of spaceflight enterprises in the world. That Blue Origin was on the precipice of accelerating further makes this setback all the more painful.
New Glenn an essential part of a Moon Base
The failure of New Glenn also has major implications for NASA and its surging efforts to return humans to the Moon before the end of this decade, and to establish a lunar base on the surface.
On Tuesday NASA announced that it had selected the New Glenn rocket to deliver the first two rovers, built by Lunar Outpost and Astrolab, to the lunar surface in 2028. Blue Origin has developed its own cargo lunar lander, Blue Moon Mark 1, designed to fly on top of New Glenn. It was due to launch this fall to the Moon for the first time, and again next year carrying the VIPER rover to the Moon for NASA.

Then there is the larger Blue Moon Mark 2 lander, which is due to fly on a larger and more powerful version of the New Glenn rocket with nine first stage engines, known as 9×4. NASA is counting on the Mark 2 lander, alongside SpaceX’s Starship vehicle, to carry humans to the Moon on a regular basis—and soon.
Pad infrastructure severely damaged
It is too early to determine the impacts from this failure, but they will be considerable. Early reports from sources suggest that the launch infrastructure at LC-36A is severely damaged. A source indicated that one of the lightning towers may not be salvageable, and that the transporter-erector may also be damaged beyond repair.
The company recently began construction on a second New Glenn launch site nearby, LC-36B. However work there is in its early stages. It is possible, however, that completing this new launch tower may be faster than rebuilding LC-36A. New Glenn almost certainly will not launch again in 2026, and frankly a launch during the first half of 2027 would be heroic given the launch site concerns.
Blue Origin has been doing a lot of developmental work on the larger 9×4 rocket, which is expected to become the workhorse of the fleet over the smaller 7×2 rocket variant that exploded on Thursday evening in Florida. It is possible that the company now throws all of its efforts into completing work on this larger rocket.
Bezos, who made his fortune from Amazon, has largely funded Blue Origin since its founding a quarter of a century ago. He has put tens of billions of dollars into the company. Fortunately for Blue Origin, he has the financial wherewithal to sustain the company through this failure, and to accelerate its recovery efforts. NASA, too, will be very keen to see Blue Origin get back on its feet as expeditiously as possible.
If there’s a small silver lining its that the rocket that exploded Thursday night did not carry its payload of Amazon Leo internet satellites. They were safe, in a nearby integration facility, awaiting launch.

Eric Berger

Senior Space Editor

Eric Berger

Senior Space Editor

Eric Berger is the senior space editor at Ars Technica, covering everything from astronomy to private space to NASA policy, and author of two books: Liftoff, about the rise of SpaceX; and Reentry, on the development of the Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon. A certified meteorologist, Eric lives in Houston.

98 Comments

Comments

Forum view

Loading comments...

Prev story

Most Read

1.
Websites have a new way to spy on visitors: Analyzing their SSD activity

2.
Steam Deck sells out in North America within 24 hours of price hike

3.
Mystery GPS jammer in Iran becomes test for NASA satellites’ capabilities

4.
Fed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their code

5.
Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

Customize

Ars Technica has been separating the signal from
the noise for over 25 years. With our unique combination of
technical savvy and wide-ranging interest in the technological arts
and sciences, Ars is the trusted source in a sea of information. After
all, you don’t need to know everything, only what’s important.

More
from Ars

About Us
Staff Directory
Ars Newsletters
General FAQ
Posting Guidelines
AI Policy
RSS Feeds

Contact
Contact us
Advertise with us
Reprints

Manage Preferences


© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of and/or
registration on any portion of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and
Privacy Policy and
Cookie Statement and Ars
Technica Addendum and Your
California Privacy Rights. Ars Technica may earn compensation on
sales from links on this site. Read our
affiliate link policy. The material on this site may not be
reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except
with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad
Choices

Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket experienced a spectacular and disastrous explosion during a static fire test at its Florida launch site, which was noted as the most dramatic event since the Soviet Union's N1 rocket failure in 1969. The failure originated with the first stage of the rocket, which utilizes seven BE-4 engines, with the problem appearing to stem from the engine section of the vehicle. Although no injuries were reported, the event caused extensive damage to the company's launch site infrastructure, marking it as the worst disaster in Blue Origin's history.

This setback occurred at the launch pad at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida, while the static fire test was being filmed. Despite prior successes, including successful first-stage landings and reuses of the New Glenn stage, this event further complicates the company's trajectory, especially as it was poised to accelerate its launch cadence. The failure has significant implications for NASA's ongoing efforts to establish a lunar base, as New Glenn is intended to deliver lunar rovers and is part of the architecture for the larger Blue Moon Mark 2 lander, which NASA counts on alongside SpaceX Starship to facilitate regular human transport to the Moon.

The physical damage extends to the launch infrastructure at LC-36A, with reports suggesting that critical facilities, such as lightning towers and the transporter-erector, may be severely damaged. While Blue Origin has initiated construction on an alternative launch site, LC-36B, concerns remain about the timeline for rebuilding the primary facility, potentially delaying future launches. The company is currently focusing its efforts on developing the larger 9x4 rocket variant, which is expected to become the workhorse of their future fleet, rather than the smaller variant that failed. Fortunately, the financial backing provided by Jeff Bezos allows Blue Origin to sustain recovery efforts and accelerate its rebuilding process, while NASA will likely remain keenly interested in the company's recovery. As a minor positive note, the payload, consisting of Amazon Leo internet satellites, remained safe in a nearby integration facility.