Extinct Tasmanian tiger's 'snap' unlike any living mammal's bite
Recorded: Sept. 8, 2026, 6:11 a.m.
| Original | Summarized |
Extinct Tasmanian tiger’s ‘snap’ unlike any living mammal’s bite | CNN Ad Feedback CNN values your feedback 1. How relevant is this ad to you? 2. Did you encounter any technical issues? Video player was slow to load content Video content never loaded Ad froze or did not finish loading Video content did not start after ad Audio on ad was too loud Other issues Ad never loaded Ad prevented/slowed the page from loading Content moved around while ad loaded Ad was repetitive to ads I've seen previously Other issues Cancel Submit Thank You! Your effort and contribution in providing this feedback is much Close Close icon Science More Space Life Unearthed Watch Listen Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics you follow Sign out Your CNN account Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics you follow Sign out Your CNN account Listen Watch Edition US International Arabic Español Edition US International Arabic Español Space Life Unearthed Follow CNN Download the CNN App US Crime & Justice Immigration Education Transportation Race & Identity World Africa Americas Asia Australia China Europe India Middle East United Kingdom Politics Elections 2026 Trump Facts First CNN Polls Redistricting Tracker Epstein Files Business Tech Media Calculators Videos Markets Pre-markets After-Hours Fear & Greed Investing Health Life, But Better Fitness Food Sleep Mindfulness Relationships CNN Underscored Electronics Fashion Beauty Health & Fitness Home Reviews Deals Money Gifts Travel Outdoors Pets Entertainment Movies Television Celebrity Tech Innovate Style Arts Design Fashion Architecture Luxury Beauty Video Travel Destinations Food & Drink Stay Videos Sports NFL NBA MLB WNBA Golf Soccer Tennis Motorsport College Sports Olympics Bleacher Report Science Space Life Unearthed Climate Solutions Weather Weather Video Climate Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Watch Featured Shows & Films Network TV Clips CNN Headlines Shows A-Z CNN 10 CNN TV Schedule Listen All There Is with Anderson Cooper Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta The Assignment with Audie Cornish Terms of Service with Clare Duffy CNN 5 Things All CNN Podcasts Games Daily Crossword Jumble Crossword Photo Shuffle Sudoblock Sudoku 5 Things Quiz Labor Day Sales About CNN Subscribe Photos Investigations CNN Profiles CNN Leadership CNN Newsletters Work for CNN Download the CNN App Unearthed 5 min read
Tasmanian tiger skull shows it was different than any living mammal By Ashley Strickland Updated Sep 2, 2026, 2:23 PM ET PUBLISHED Sep 2, 2026, 2:23 PM ET
A Tasmanian tiger is seen in captivity circa 1930. Popperfoto/Getty Images Oceania Animal stories Agriculture Genetics See all topics Tweet Link Threads Link Copied! Follow Hunters wiped out thylacines, commonly known as Tasmanian tigers, in Australia nearly a century ago. But a myth about these shy, semi-nocturnal predators may have been behind the species’ extinction. Thylacines had a strong resemblance to wolves — so much so that they were given the species name cynocephalus, meaning “dog-head.” Along with the physical likeness came the assumption that the animals posed a similar threat to livestock. Now, new research shows that Tasmanian tigers had specialized feeding adaptations that likely prevented them from hunting the livestock they were accused of attacking. “The mostly British colonists of Tasmania tended to view unfamiliar wildlife as primitive copies of more familiar European species,” said Dr. Vera Weisbecker, lead author of a study published Monday in the journal Nature Communications, in an email. “Thylacines reminded them of wolves, so they decided that thylacines were a danger to livestock and put a bounty on its head.” Related article A rendering of a bluebuck, created with the assistance of AI by Colossal Biosciences. The Dallas-based biotech company has been secretly working to genetically engineer a hybrid of the extinct African antelope. Scroll through to learn more about the species in Colossal’s “de-extinction” program. Colossal Biosciences Colossal Biosciences says it’s been secretly working to bring back this extinct antelope 6 min read Thylacines disappeared about 2,000 years ago everywhere except the Australian island of Tasmania, according to the National Museum of Australia. When settlers began establishing sheep and cattle farms there in the 1800s, they exterminated the distinctively striped thylacines, blaming them for livestock losses that were actually due to feral dogs and human mismanagement. The last thylacine living in captivity died from exposure in 1936 at the Beaumaris Zoo in Hobart, Tasmania — shortly after the Tasmanian government belatedly granted the species protected status. A new analysis of thylacine skulls highlights just how different Tasmanian tigers were from wolves — or any other living carnivorous mammal. A unique combination of skull and jaw features suggests they hunted small, rabbit-size prey rather than larger animals such as sheep. “Thylacines were in fact more closely related to kangaroos than to dogs,” said Weisbecker, professor of evolutionary biology at Flinders University in Australia. “They were marsupials whose ancestors separated from the other mammals long before the dinosaurs went extinct.” The findings add to growing evidence that Tasmanian tigers were quite different from initial assumptions — and reveal the complexities of trying to understand an extinct species. Large skull, quick bite While scanning a dataset she had already published, Weisbecker noticed unusually large skull measurements and worried she had made an error. “I even sent a student to our teaching collections after-hours to check, but this confirmed that thylacine skulls were tremendous,” she said. “That’s when I started wondering what was going on with this animal’s skull.” Previous research has shown that thylacines were about half the size of past scientific estimates, more similar to large coyotes than hulking wolves. A 2020 study by one of Weisbecker’s collaborators determined they were about 37.5 pounds (17 kilograms) on average — not 65 pounds (29.5 kilograms) as once suspected. But the thylacine’s oversize skull was about as large as that of a gray wolf, the authors of the new study found. They measured and compared the skulls of thylacines, foxes and wolves during the analysis. Although similar in size, the thylacine skull (right) proved larger than a gray wolf skull. Vera Weisbecker “But while it was big, it wasn’t really shaped like the skull of a big predator,” said study coauthor Dr. Douglass Rovinsky, associate research scientist in the School of Biological Sciences at Monash University and researcher at the Australian Museum, in a statement. “Instead, the thylacine’s snout was long and slender, almost delicate — not robust like the snout of a grey wolf. It very much looks like the snout of a fox or jackal, which can be much smaller than thylacines.” A combination of a large skull and a long upper jaw and snout suggests the thylacine likely used a quick, snapping motion to grab small or medium-size prey, such as bandicoots or rabbit-size marsupials. “The longer a jaw is, the faster its tip moves when an animal bites. This increases the impact of the strike,” Weisbecker said. “We think that the thylacine’s huge skull size allowed it to withstand these bite forces.” Related article The tissue samples were taken from a 130-year-old Tasmanian tiger specimen stored at room temperature at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (pictured here.) Emilio Mármol Sánchez Scientists recover RNA from an extinct species for the first time 3 min read But when comparing the feeding style of thylacines with that of other living predatory mammals, the researchers turned up no matches, so they looked for comparable traits elsewhere across the animal kingdom, she said. “Its skull was functionally more similar to living and extinct fish-catching species, like some crocodiles,” Weisbecker said. “This includes long, large jaws that can take high snapping impacts, but are not too fragile to withstand the stresses of struggling prey.” The study provides compelling evidence that the thylacine was not simply a marsupial version of a gray wolf, said Love Dalén, professor of evolutionary genomics at Stockholm University in Sweden. While Dalén has researched thylacines in the past, he was not involved in the new study. “Its distinctive skull suggests it used fast and powerful bites to catch small and agile prey, rather than grappling with large animals like grey wolves do,” he wrote in an email. “It’s a fascinating example of how two animals can look remarkably similar at first glance, while in reality functioning in fundamentally different ways.” The researchers scanned a thylacine skull (left) to compare it with that of a wolf. Vera Weisbecker ‘Resurrecting’ a lost species Little is known about the ancestors of thylacines, which were the last survivors of an ancient marsupial lineage estimated to be more than 40 million years old. And the thylacine has no close living relatives, Weisbecker noted. “There are some intriguing fossils suggesting that some of the thylacine’s skull traits evolved quite early, but we need to study them more to be sure,” she said. Analyzing both recent and ancient thylacine skulls from across Australia could showcase just how diverse the species was before it disappeared. “These stories matter because Australia has lost more mammalian species than any other country worldwide, and 40% of its marsupial species are threatened,” Weisbecker said. “My next research will aim to match these stark statistics with tangible facts about what irreplaceable biodiversity heritage we are at risk of losing.” The last captive thylacine died in 1936. Topical Press Agency/Hulton Archive/Getty Images The Tasmanian tiger has become a key figure in the “de-extinction” efforts by one of Weisbecker’s collaborators, Professor Andrew Pask. Pask is the head of the Thylacine Integrated Genetic Restoration Research Lab at the University of Melbourne in Australia. He’s working with Dallas-based biotech company Colossal Biosciences to “resurrect” the thylacine by creating a hybrid animal, harnessing advances in genetics, ancient DNA retrieval and artificial reproduction. Weisbecker is not involved in the efforts but said her main concern was ensuring Indigenous people would have custodianship of the animal and that their input would help shape the thylacine’s de-extinction plans. “That said, de-extinction efforts have tremendous use — I would even say that the achievement of de-extinction isn’t the main impact here,” she said. “Reconstructing an extinct species requires groundbreaking insights about genes, gene expression, conservation genetics, and reproductive biology, which de-extinction efforts are currently undertaking with funding that would otherwise not be available.” Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more. Oceania Animal stories Agriculture Genetics See all topics Tweet Link Threads Link Copied! Follow
Ad Feedback
Paid Content Paid Content Ad Feedback
Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics you follow Sign out Your CNN account Listen Watch US Crime & Justice Immigration Education Transportation Race & Identity World Africa Americas Asia Australia China Europe India Middle East United Kingdom Politics Elections 2026 Trump Facts First CNN Polls Redistricting Tracker Epstein Files Business Tech Media Calculators Videos Markets Pre-markets After-Hours Fear & Greed Investing Health Life, But Better Fitness Food Sleep Mindfulness Relationships CNN Underscored Electronics Fashion Beauty Health & Fitness Home Reviews Deals Money Gifts Travel Outdoors Pets Entertainment Movies Television Celebrity Tech Innovate Style Arts Design Fashion Architecture Luxury Beauty Video Travel Destinations Food & Drink Stay News Videos Sports NFL NBA MLB WNBA Golf Soccer Tennis Motorsport College Sports Olympics Bleacher Report Science Space Life Unearthed Climate Solutions Weather Weather Video Climate Ukraine-Russia War Israel-Hamas War Watch Featured Shows & Films Network TV Clips CNN Headlines Shows A-Z CNN 10 CNN TV Schedule Listen All There Is with Anderson Cooper Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta The Assignment with Audie Cornish Terms of Service with Clare Duffy CNN 5 Things All CNN Podcasts Games Daily Crossword Jumble Crossword Photo Shuffle Sudoblock Sudoku 5 Things Quiz Labor Day Sales About CNN Subscribe Photos Investigations CNN Profiles CNN Leadership CNN Newsletters Work for CNN Science Watch Listen Subscribe Sign in My Account Settings Newsletters Topics you follow Sign out Your CNN account Follow CNN Download the CNN app Download the CNN app Terms of Use Privacy Policy Ad Choices Accessibility & CC About Subscribe Newsletters Transcripts Help Center Sitemap © 2026 Cable News Network. A Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All Rights Reserved. CNN Sans ™ & © 2016 Cable News Network. Download the CNN app Scan the QR code to download the CNN app on Google Play. Download the CNN app Scan the QR code to download the CNN app from the Apple Store. |
New research concerning the skull structure of the extinct Tasmanian tiger, or thylacine, challenges long-held assumptions about its predatory adaptations and evolutionary relationship with other mammals. Previous views often associated the thylacines with wolves, leading to historical misconceptions regarding their perceived threat to Australian livestock. However, a detailed analysis of thylacine skulls reveals distinct features that indicate a fundamentally different hunting style than grappling with large predators. The study performed by researchers, including Dr. Vera Weisbecker, demonstrated that the thylacine’s skull and jaw features suggest specialized feeding adaptations suited for catching small or medium-sized prey, such as rabbit-size marsupials or bandicoots, rather than hunting larger animals like sheep. The length and slenderness of the snout indicate a mechanism involving a quick, snapping motion to secure prey, increasing the impact of the strike. This morphology suggests that the large skull provided necessary structural resilience to withstand these rapid, forceful bites against agile prey. Furthermore, when comparing the feeding mechanics of thylacines to other living predatory mammals, the researchers found no direct matches, leading them to look for analogous traits across the broader animal kingdom. Evolutionary genomics research further reframed the thylacine’s place in the mammalian lineage. Dr. Vera Weisbecker noted that thylacines were more closely related to kangaroos, positioning them within the marsupial lineage which diverged significantly earlier than other mammals. This finding supports the conclusion that thylacines evolved along a distinct evolutionary path from wolves, underscoring the complexity inherent in understanding extinct species and the diversity within the mammalian kingdom. The physical dimensions of the thylacine also require reevaluation. Initial estimates of the animal's weight were considerably higher than subsequent analysis suggested; the contemporary study indicated that thylacines averaged about thirty-seven point five pounds, which is more comparable to large coyotes than the previously suspected estimate of sixty-five pounds. This refinement in size further supports a specialized niche for prey capture distinct from bulkier carnivores. Moreover, the skull structure exhibits functional similarities not only to other mammals but also to living and extinct fish-catching species, such as some crocodiles. This comparison suggests that the thylacine developed jaw structures capable of absorbing high snapping impacts while maintaining the necessary flexibility, distinguishing its predatory strategy from grappling with large mammalian prey. Professor Love Dalén concurred that the distinctive skull morphology implies a method based on fast and powerful bites targeting small and agile animals, contrasting sharply with the hunting tactics employed by grey wolves. The story of the thylacine highlights broader concerns regarding biodiversity loss in Australia, as the continent has lost more mammalian species than any other region globally, and a significant portion of its marsupial species is threatened. In the context of modern conservation, the scientific insights gained from studying this extinct species are vital for understanding irreplaceable biodiversity heritage. This work is also situated within active "de-extinction" efforts, where researchers like Professor Andrew Pask are utilizing advances in genetics and ancient DNA to create hybrid animals. While these reconstruction efforts hold promise, Dr. Weisbecker emphasized that the primary impact of such endeavors should be focused on ensuring Indigenous custodianship and incorporating their input into shaping conservation strategies, rather than solely achieving de-extinction itself. |