New standards for masculinity are stacked against men’s health | The VergeSkip to main contentThe homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.The VergeThe Verge logo.TechReviewsScienceEntertainmentAIPolicyNotificationsNotificationsHamburger Navigation ButtonThe homepageThe VergeThe Verge logo.NotificationsNotificationsHamburger Navigation ButtonNavigation DrawerThe VergeThe Verge logo.Login / Sign UpcloseCloseSearchLightSystemDarkTechExpandAmazonAppleFacebookGoogleMicrosoftSamsungBusinessSee all techReviewsExpandSmart Home ReviewsPhone ReviewsTablet ReviewsHeadphone ReviewsSee all reviewsScienceExpandSpaceEnergyEnvironmentHealthSee all scienceEntertainmentExpandTV ShowsMoviesAudioSee all entertainmentAIExpandOpenAIAnthropicSee all AIPolicyExpandAntitrustPoliticsLawSecuritySee all policyGadgetsExpandLaptopsPhonesTVsHeadphonesSpeakersWearablesSee all gadgetsVerge ShoppingExpandBuying GuidesDealsGift GuidesSee all shoppingGamingExpandXboxPlayStationNintendoSee all gamingStreamingExpandDisneyHBONetflixYouTubeCreatorsSee all streamingTransportationExpandElectric CarsAutonomous CarsRide-sharingScootersSee all transportationFeaturesVerge VideoExpandTikTokYouTubeInstagramPodcastsExpandDecoderThe VergecastVersion HistoryNewslettersArchivesStoreVerge Product UpdatesSubscribeFacebookThreadsInstagramYoutubeRSSThe VergeThe Verge logo.New standards for masculinity are stacked against men’s healthNotificationsNotificationsComments DrawerNotificationsCommentsLoading commentsGetting the conversation ready...ColumnCloseColumnPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ColumnScienceCloseSciencePosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ScienceHealthCloseHealthPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All HealthNew standards for masculinity are stacked against men’s healthChasing unrealistic standards encourages men to turn themselves into DIY science experiments.by Victoria SongCloseVictoria SongSenior Reviewer, Wearable TechPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Victoria SongSep 10, 2026, 2:00 PM UTCLinkShareGift Photo: Getty ImagesColumnCloseColumnPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ColumnScienceCloseSciencePosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ScienceHealthCloseHealthPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All HealthNew standards for masculinity are stacked against men’s healthChasing unrealistic standards encourages men to turn themselves into DIY science experiments.by Victoria SongCloseVictoria SongSenior Reviewer, Wearable TechPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Victoria SongSep 10, 2026, 2:00 PM UTCLinkShareGiftVictoria SongCloseVictoria SongPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Victoria Song is a senior reporter and author of the Optimizer newsletter. She has more than 13 years of experience reporting on wearables, health tech, and more. Before coming to The Verge, she worked for Gizmodo and PC Magazine.This is Optimizer, a weekly newsletter sent from Verge senior reviewer Victoria Song that dissects and discusses the latest gizmos and potions that swear they’re going to change your life. Opt in for Optimizer here.Whenever the algorithm serves up a steaming pile of looksmaxxing, I flash back to an old sketch from That Mitchell and Webb Look. An ordinary woman is told by a commercial narrator that she’s “leaking, hairy, aging, overweight, and everything hurts.” Women, the smug narrator says, for god’s sake, sort yourselves out by buying roughly $300 of products. After a jump cut, an average man is told to shave and get drunk, guitars blaring in the background. The reason? Because he’s already brilliant.Back when that sketch first aired in 2009, it was funny because it felt broadly true. But in the age of looksmaxxing, where men are increasingly obsessed with testosterone, smashing their bones in pursuit of a sharp jawline, and optimizing their penises, that sketch feels like a glimpse into antiquity.Today, you have men in subreddits and Facebook groups posting before-and-after pics at the gym, arms flexed for maximum veiny bicep effect. In the comments, they ask for each other’s stacks, protocols, and dosing advice, which include everything from T to unapproved gray-market peptides. Some say it’s to score baddies. Others say it’s to maximize their gains at the gym. A few seem to think turning themselves into science experiments is how they’ll find the fountain of youth. To me, it feels similar to what women have done for ages: buying snake oil that preys on their insecurities.“I take Cialis, but not for sex,” begins one of biohacker and tech entrepreneur Bryan Johnson’s X posts. “It’s actually a longevity medicine. Cialis (Tadalafil) is great for the same reason it gives you fantastic erections… it improves blood flow.”Tadalafil does, in fact, improve blood flow. The medicine is a vasodilator, meaning it relaxes muscles and widens blood vessels. It’s most widely known as a treatment for erectile dysfunction. (To be clear, it doesn’t cause erections but helps them last when they occur.) It’s also prescribed to alleviate urinary issues in people with enlarged prostates and high blood pressure in the pulmonary artery. Biohackers like Johnson tout a low dose of tadalafil daily as helping lower cardiovascular risk and cognitive decline. Gym rats often microdose tadalafil as a preworkout supplement because, well, the erections are supposedly better and dilating blood vessels is thought to lead to better “muscle pumps.”Enhanced, the company behind the pro-doping Enhanced Games, sells low-dose tadalafil on its site. Clavicular, the most infamous looksmaxxer, has also stated that he’s taken about 5mg of tadalafil in the past as part of an extensive stack. This, despite the fact that he’s 20 years old and far from the conventional profile of someone a doctor might prescribe tadalafil to. Popular podcaster Andrew Huberman has also recommended on his show that every man over 40 should be taking a low dose of tadalafil as a preventative measure.Cialis, or tadalafil, works by relaxing muscles and improving blood flow. Photo: Getty ImagesOf course, tadalafil is just like any other medicine. While many may not experience adverse effects at low daily dosages, some will. And like any medication, there are some people who shouldn’t take it and there are drug interactions to be wary of.It’d be one thing if these influencers were just promoting tadalafil. But most are promoting multiple substances, seemingly all of which you need to be a man. Testosterone, for instance, is massively popular in the same cohort. Ninety-one percent of the athletes at the inaugural Enhanced Games dabbled with testosterone. Notably, Pete Hegseth recently announced mandatory testosterone screenings for the troops. Some also hype up retatrutide, an unapproved peptide currently undergoing phase three clinical trials, along with TB-500 and BPC-157, two gray-market peptides colloquially known as the Wolverine stack for their supposed wound healing and muscle recovery benefits. And the more things you stack, the greater the risk that a combination has an unintended effect. In the case of lesser-studied experimental treatments, even doctors may not know what those effects are — and might not know for a long time.The stated reasons for taking these risks are myriad. But whether it’s because it’ll help someone get jacked, live longer, perform better in bed, or just “have more energy,” it boils down to a singular message: It’ll make you more of a man.“This kind of masculinity is a little bit fantastical,” says Dr. Arthur Burnett, the Patrick C. Walsh professor of urology at Johns Hopkins, referring to the current cultural obsession with “maxxing.” Burnett should know. On top of over three decades as a men’s health expert, his research into nitric oxide biochemical mechanisms in erectile tissue helped pave the way for drugs like Viagra.Regarding men taking on all of these additional requirements, he says that “there’s not really a scientific basis.”“I think it’s unfortunate that we’ve pushed the pendulum in a direction that may be harmful, frankly, psychologically at the very least but possibly even physically to the body. It could be problematic trying to adopt medical terms like ‘prevention’ and ‘men’s health’.”Are you a peptide user?I’m researching a story on peptide use, and I’m looking to interview regular people who are using gray-market peptides. If you’re interested in participating, email me at victoria.song@theverge.com or message me at Signal @vicmsong.14.Burnett is essentially pointing to the divide between how clinicians and the biohacking / looksmaxxing communities view medicine. On the one side, you have medical professionals who largely view drugs as a way to treat deficiencies and bring people back to a “normal” baseline. On the other, you have influencers and enthusiasts (which can include clinicians) who believe that drugs can and ought to be used to “enhance” people beyond their natural limits. It’s a tension that’s at the heart of so many debates in the wellness wild west.“Preventative care should really be something that those who are at risk or have health adversities can make changes in a way that’s going to correct a problem. What you have here is completely healthy people doing things that can be problematic,” explains Burnett.Testosterone, he says, is a classic example. Otherwise healthy men who over-supplement the hormonal steroid often inadvertently make themselves infertile. For some men, too much testosterone can also trigger a genetic predisposition for hair thinning — which looksmaxxers often address by taking minoxidil. Add another supplement, drug, or product to combat the side effects of minoxidil — which include dizziness, headaches, and bloating — and that’s how you end up with a stack.What gets lost in all these stacks and protocols is that health isn’t about optimization. For many young men, “optimizing” seems to be less of a goal than a vaguely defined baseline they’re expected to maintain forever. Anything less is a failure, a weakness — unhealthy.A depressing way to spend an afternoon is rifling through looksmaxxing and gear forums. (I don’t recommend staying too long — unless you feel like torturing yourself reading 4chan-esque insults and slurs about penis size and “weekly slays.”)In one post, a supposed 18-year-old asks for advice dosing Cialis to have better erections and “get more flaccid hang.” In a biohacking subreddit, a 30-year-old essentially crowdsources whether he’s developing a “dependency” on tadalafil. At no point, despite all the posturing, do any of the men in the posts I read seem to be genuinely happy. They’re often boastful about how good they feel or how many conquests they’ve had. But mostly, there seems to be an undercurrent of angry self-loathing. A desperate urge to “fix” oneself for… what or whom exactly? I never find a coherent answer.I can’t believe I’m writing about Cialismaxxing. Photo: Bloomberg via Getty ImagesAdmittedly, I’m not a man. I will never know what it means to be a man or experience the societal pressures that men face. But there’s something strange about how the internet is amplifying a subsect of men turning themselves into science experiments. There’s a veritable pipeline from relatively benign trends like boy kibble protein-washing and news stories about RFK Jr. working out shirtless with Kid Rock to whatever it is the Enhanced Games and Bryan Johnson are doing. It’s easy to write off, until Whoop’s AI recommends your boss up his testosterone levels — not because he’s deficient, but because he’s not optimized for performance.“It happens in my clinic periodically — guys thinking they need enhancements, or they’re unhappy with certain interventions, or they feel they’re not performing at a certain level,” says Burnett. “It’s counterproductive as it actually promotes stigma [around men’s health] because they can’t live up to what they think is the notion of the ideal man.” That, he says, creates more anxiety, stress, embarrassment, and shame. On top of that, it makes it hard for men to speak more openly about genuine health issues or seek a professional’s help. Anything “abnormal” becomes something to be suffered in silence or supplemented away.For now, it’s probably contained to a chronically online niche. (Burnett says these behaviors aren’t heavily prevalent in his practice just yet, but then again — how likely are the most susceptible men to trust the medical establishment when that’s the first thing wellness grifters seek to discredit?) But this niche is loud and it loves to post. Eventually, those messages embed themselves in the broader culture — even if everyone knows better.The only thing I can conclude is that the looksmaxxers are not okay. I hope that one day they will be, that this is a passing fad that one day we’ll look back and laugh at. But in the meantime, I’ll leave this with some advice from Burnett.“As long as we’re living healthy, we’re doing the right thing. Please accept that you are a good man for who you are, and don’t be swayed by the influencers.”Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.Victoria SongCloseVictoria SongSenior Reviewer, Wearable TechPosts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All by Victoria SongColumnCloseColumnPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ColumnHealthCloseHealthPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All HealthOptimizerCloseOptimizerPosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All OptimizerScienceCloseSciencePosts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.FollowFollowSee All ScienceMost PopularMost PopularThe iPhone Duo is Apple’s first foldableHands-on with the foldable iPhone DuoApple’s iPhone 18 Pro has a dynamic aperture main cameraiPhone 18 live blog: On the ground at Apple’s biggest eventiPhone 18 Pro and Pro Max: Our first hands-on impressionsVideoThe Verge DailyA free daily digest of the news that matters most.Email (required)Sign UpBy submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.Advertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native adMore in ColumnSolar power is having its toaster momentExplore the globe in field recordingsWe spent the week testing IFA’s best (and weirdest) gadgets, ask us anythingContinuous glucose monitors are about to get more complicatedProfessor Murder Rides the Subway is a forgotten slice of dance punk perfectionVicariously hike the Appalachian in the gorgeous A Trail TaleSolar power is having its toaster momentThomas RickerSep 6Explore the globe in field recordingsTerrence O'BrienSep 5We spent the week testing IFA’s best (and weirdest) gadgets, ask us anythingDominic PrestonSep 4Continuous glucose monitors are about to get more complicatedVictoria SongSep 2Professor Murder Rides the Subway is a forgotten slice of dance punk perfectionTerrence O'BrienAug 30Vicariously hike the Appalachian in the gorgeous A Trail TaleTerrence O'BrienAug 29Advertiser Content FromThis is the title for the native adTop StoriesSep 9Hands-on with the foldable iPhone Duo10:00 AM UTCThe variable aperture isn’t the cool part of the iPhone 18 Pro’s cameraSep 9Verge staffers react to the iPhone Duo: What we love and don’t love11:00 AM UTCMathematicians want proof OpenAI didn’t use their work Sep 9I spent an hour riding inside Tesla’s steering-wheel-free CybercabThe VergeThe Verge logo.FacebookThreadsInstagramYoutubeRSSContactTip UsCommunity GuidelinesArchivesAboutEthics StatementHow We Rate and Review ProductsCookie SettingsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy RightsYour Privacy ChoicesCookie NoticeAdChoicesLicensing FAQAccessibilityPlatform StatusPenske Media CorporationThe Verge is a part of PMX Global, LLC, a subsidiary of Penske Media Corporation.© 2026 VM Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.Our SitesThe American PavilionARTnewsArt in AmericaArtforumArt Week NYCBeauty IncBillboardDeadlineDick Clark ProductionsThe DodoEaterFlow SpaceFNGold DerbyGolden GlobesThe Hollywood ReporterIndieWireLife is BeautifulPopsugarPunchSJ DenimRobb ReportRolling StoneSB NationSHE MediaShe KnowsSourcing JournalSoapsSporticoStyleCasterSXSWThrillistVarietyThe VergeVibeWWDNotifications DrawerThe VergeThe Verge logo.Sign in to see your notifications or create an account to join the conversation.Sign in

The pursuit of new standards for masculinity often places men into the role of self-directed science experiments, driven by the chase for unrealistic ideals that fuel a trend known as looksmaxxing. This environment encourages men to explore various substances and protocols, often sourced from gray markets, seeking enhancements related to physical appearance, strength, and perceived longevity. For instance, discussions on platforms like Reddit and Facebook frequently involve sharing methods and dosages for compounds, ranging from testosterone to unapproved peptides.

The text examines the complex relationship between pharmaceutical interventions, biohacking culture, and men’s health. Tadalafil, or Cialis, is presented as an example, not just for treating erectile dysfunction but also for improving blood flow, a mechanism that biohackers utilize to claim benefits for cardiovascular risk reduction and cognitive decline. This use illustrates the tension between clinical medicine, which focuses on treating deficiencies to restore a normal baseline, and the biohacking community's desire to enhance performance beyond those natural limits.

The discussion highlights a disparity in how medicine is viewed: medical professionals tend to focus on correcting deficiencies, whereas enthusiasts and influencers advocate for using substances to enhance attributes. This creates friction, particularly concerning testosterone supplementation, where some men over-supplementing steroids risk infertility or genetic predispositions for hair thinning, necessitating further interventions. The layering of supplements, drugs, and products to counteract side effects, such as those from minoxidil, results in complex stacks where the combined effects are often unknown.

The central argument posits that this pursuit of optimization often ignores the fundamental principle that health is not about infinite optimization but about maintaining a healthy baseline. For many, optimization becomes an unending goal, which can lead to anxiety and distress. As Dr. Arthur Burnett, a specialist in urology, suggests, there is often no clear scientific basis for these "maxxing" endeavors. He argues that pushing this direction can be psychologically damaging and potentially physically harmful, including creating stigma around men's health because men who do not achieve the idealized standard are perceived as lacking.

The online sphere, while amplifying these trends, also fosters a cycle where individuals, regardless of their self-proclaimed status, often exhibit underlying self-loathing masked by boasting. The text concludes by suggesting that the focus on external optimization distracts from genuine well-being, and advises that individuals should resist the immediate sway of influencers, emphasizing that living a healthy life is inherently correct.