With a Better Understanding of Physics, We Could Predict Volcanic Eruptions | WIREDSkip to main contentMenuWIREDSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuWIREDAccountAccountNewslettersSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoLivestreamsWIRED StoreSearchSearchRobin George AndrewsScienceSep 13, 2026 5:30 AMHow Scientists Could One Day Predict Volcanic Eruptions Like the WeatherIt will take a better understanding of underground physics, but volcanologists believe it may be possible.Photo-Illustration: Courtesy of Quanta MagazineCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyThe original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine.In the summer of 1991, Pinatubo, a volcano in the Philippines, self-destructed. The eruption started on June 12, and three days later it culminated in a tremendous explosion. By the time pyroclastic flows—incandescent avalanches of molten rock and gas—tumbled down its sterilized slopes, Pinatubo’s peak had been obliterated and replaced by a 2.5-kilometer-wide chasm.The eruption killed more than 800 people, mainly because roofs, weighed down by rain-saturated ash, collapsed. But it could have been so much worse: About 250,000 people, across multiple cities and a sprawling US Air Force base, lived in the volcano’s shadow. When Pinatubo started convulsing and belching steam in April of that year, scientists from the US and the Philippines deployed an array of instruments that tracked the volcano’s inner tumult.“We didn’t know much about that volcano, and so there was this really rapid geological assessment. And the assessment said, ‘Oh, crap, when this thing erupts, it only erupts big,’” says Mike Poland, current scientist in charge at the US Geological Service’s Yellowstone Volcano Observatory. “And that became the basis for a forecast.”By early June, ash and lava were escaping Pinatubo’s flanks, and an evacuation was ordered, just a few days before the cataclysmic hammer fell. It was, in other words, a very close call.Those scientists saved countless lives, but their forecast was more of an educated guess than it might have appeared. It was nothing like a weather forecast; they couldn’t say with anything resembling certainty that on June 12 an explosive eruption was going to occur, nor could they predict the evolution of that eruption.With very few exceptions, this imprecision is true of all well-monitored volcanoes. But volcanology, as a field, has made great leaps since Pinatubo blew its top. The instrumentation is more advanced, machine learning has made interpreting data far more efficient, and scientists have a much better understanding of the magmatic plumbing that drives volcanism. That’s prompted me—as a professionally trained volcanologist who now writes a lot about the field—to wonder: How close are we to forecasting volcano behavior the way we forecast the weather?In this award-winning image, photographer Alberto Garcia captured a truck fleeing the cataclysmic eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines.
Photograph: Courtesy of Quanta Magazine/Alberto GarciaToday, we know that a storm of a certain magnitude will fall on a specific city in a few days’ time. Will scientists ever be able to say that a week from now, a certain volcano has an 80 percent chance of erupting in a particular way—with lava gushing, with a certain explosive force, with pyroclastic flows that will travel down its western flank? I asked around, and I found both skepticism and a surprising degree of optimism. “The short answer—otherwise I wouldn’t be doing this—is yes,” says Diana Roman, a volcanologist at Carnegie Science in Washington, DC.Though sky watchers have anticipated the weather for millennia, contemporary scientific prediction of weather is a recent invention: The first mathematical equations grounding these models were derived at the start of the 20th century. Today, meteorologists can take a pandemoniac system—Earth’s atmosphere, oceans, and landforms—and make accurate forecasts up to two weeks into the future.Weather affects more people than volcanism—namely, everyone, all the time—but some 800 million people live within 100 kilometers of an active volcano, and some (very rare) eruptions can also affect the entire planet. Both weather and volcanism are complex systems that we want to understand, but the problems they present for forecasting are different.“The big difference between [volcanoes] and the weather forecasting is the weather is always happening,” says Jenni Barclay, a volcanologist at the University of Bristol in England. The atmosphere is perpetually visible and measurable to meteorologists. “Even they would say they need more observations.” Magma, on the other hand, resides kilometers below Earth’s crust, and at most, active volcanoes erupt once every few decades.Each volcano is also unique. The architecture of the subterranean pathways that funnel magma to the surface, the chemistry of the magma, the cadence of eruptions, and the assortment of eruption styles differ from place to place. And eruptions don’t have just one trigger. The temperature and pressure of the magma reservoir, the weakness of the enclosing rock, the gas and crystal content, the depth of the magma, the regional motion of tectonic plates—these factors all contribute to whether a paroxysm happens or fizzles out.“Geology is chaotic,” says Marius Isken, a geophysicist at the GFZ Helmholtz Center for Geosciences in Potsdam, Germany. But there is order buried in the chaos. Can we find it?A volcanologist from the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology in Italy installs a gravitmetry station to measure magma movement within Sicily’s Mount Etna.
Photograph: Courtesy of Quanta Magazine/Tom Pfeiffer/AlamyI imagine volcanoes as orchestras composed of hundreds of different instruments. Forecasting eruptions isn’t about hearing the music. We already do that: Seismometers sense the cracking of rock as magma ascends; ground sensors and satellites can track shifts in the crust, indicating where magma is flowing; gas detectors reveal when magma rises to shallow depths, depressurizes, and emits noxious fumes.The challenge comes in knowing how the symphony will develop to a climax, long before it gets underway. Today, at the most comprehensively monitored volcanoes, the best that volcanologists can normally offer is not prediction but a form of acute caution. Often, alert systems—including those used by the US Geological Survey—notify the public if a volcano is exhibiting heightened or escalating unrest. But that doesn’t mean an eruption is imminent. “Only 50 percent of volcanic unrest that looks like it’s going to be an eruption ends up in an eruption,” says Jessica Johnson, a geophysicist at the University of East Anglia in England.“The big difference between [volcanoes] and the weather forecasting is the weather is always happening.”Jenni Barclay, University of BristolOn the other hand, some volcanoes prefer to ambush us, even when smothered in instrumentation. Pockets of highly pressurized water trapped just below the surface can be heated by adjacent bodies of magma. If that pocket ruptures, a dangerous steam explosion follows, which can then unleash imprisoned magma. This type of eruption often occurs with no discernible warning signs, and it’s like a land mine going off next to a buried mountain of dynamite.Small eruptions of the Soufrière Hills volcano on the Caribbean island of Montserrat preceded destructive large eruptions in 1997.
Photograph: Courtesy of Quanta Magazine/Peter Cripps/Alamy Stock PhotoMore predictive detail can come if a volcano has been studied over the course of several eruption cycles. At certain peaks, such as Italy’s Stromboli and Etna volcanoes, which regularly spout fountains of lava, scientists can confidently forecast an outburst. “We have systems that can tell us that in a few hours, the volcano will erupt,” says Maurizio Ripepe, a geophysicist at the University of Florence.Using seismology and ground deformation measurements, scientists at other volcanoes, including Hawaii’s Kīlauea and those on Iceland’s Reykjanes Peninsula, can track magma migrating underground with such staggering precision that they know exactly where it will emerge as lava, to within an hour or so. But such precise forecasts are “relatively unusual,” says Tom Winder, a volcano seismologist at the University of Iceland. These are frequently active volcanoes, unlikely to produce a major explosive event, and people in surrounding communities generally know to be wary of them. In most other cases, the earliest warning times—perhaps an hour or so before the eruption—aren’t always enough to get people to safety.Forecasting eruptions is a big ask, because volcanoes cannot be reduced to simple models. They’re baroque geologic beasts with hidden, labyrinthine plumbing. Twenty years ago, during my first year as a geoscience undergraduate, a lecturer told me that predicting when and where the next major eruption would take place was a pipe dream—the implication being that volcanoes are far too idiosyncratic and mercurial to have much in common with one another. That comment felt off even then. After all, they are all vessels of immense pressure and heat. Their schematics may differ. But molten rock flows through all of them, and eventually, something cracks, breaks, and explodes.There were many signals that Mount St. Helens was going to erupt in 1980, but the form of the eruption was unexpected. The event led to the development of more sophisticated monitoring systems in the United States.
Photograph: Courtesy of Quanta Magazine/J Marshall—Tribaleye Images/Alamy Stock PhotoEveryone I spoke to agreed that scientists still need to crack a vital piece of the volcano forecasting puzzle. “We don’t even fully understand the underlying physics,” Roman says. What causes a magma reservoir to transition from a stable state to catastrophic failure?“They have to have shared physics,” she says. If those underlying equations can be discovered, perhaps we can apply them to all volcanoes and output values that tell us, with high accuracy, when the next eruption is due and what its shape may be.Scientists have identified some of these governing equations, but they only apply after eruptions have begun. Using more than a century of observations, researchers have largely derived the physics of volcanic hazards—particularly lava flows and pyroclastic flows. For examples, the Navier-Stokes equations, which describe how fluids of all kinds move, have been successfully applied to both of these hazards, while the heat equation reveals how and when these volcanic fluids cool down. Today, they allow experts to predict, for specific volcanoes, where outpourings will emerge, how far the different kinds of flows will reach, and how quickly it will all happen.This work saves lives, but it’s a fraction of the forecasting dilemma. Using our weather analogy, this is like saying, “Once the rain starts to fall, we can forecast what watersheds might flood,” Poland says. Knowing when the storm will start requires getting at the subsurface physics of magma reservoirs.For now, eruption warnings are based on recognizing patterns in measurable geophysical signals, such as an escalation of seismic activity, that precede eruptions. But correlation isn’t enough for prediction if the patterns aren’t consistent, which is often the case. “What we’re trying to do is looking at the causative relationships there … to understand the physics,” Johnson says. “If you understand what those patterns mean, [then] when those patterns change, we’re not that stuck.”Johnson is part of a new project named Ex-X: Expecting the Unexpected, a multidisciplinary effort led by the University of Bristol to investigate the drivers of dangerous volcanic escalations. Researchers are focusing on the volcanoes of the Eastern Caribbean, which erupt relatively frequently and can quickly transition from effusive-style, lava-heavy eruptions to sudden, catastrophic, explosive ones. La Soufrière, on the island of St. Vincent, provided a recent example of this: In December 2020, the volcano began expelling a viscous mass of lava, which continued for several months. Then multiple explosions threw pyroclastic flows down its slopes.The eruption of Pinatubo in 1991 left a 2.5-kilometer-wide caldera where the summit has once been. It is now Lake Pinatubo.
Photograph: Courtesy of Quanta Magazine/T. J. Casadevall/US Geological SurveyAs part of this work, hundreds of seismometers, as well as networks of fiber-optic cables, will be used to record even the tiniest of earthquakes during periods of tranquility and unrest. This monitoring effort will be aided by machine learning programs that will be taught to identify minute shifts in the seismic soundtrack of these volcanoes. In recent years, these programs have been used to process a huge volume of data far more proficiently and efficiently than scientists can manage alone. This work has already revealed myriad previously hidden magmatic pathways beneath volcanoes while also permitting scientists to track, almost in real time, magma barreling through the crust.The idea of Ex-X is to gain unprecedented detail on how tiny changes in the behavior or position of magma can lead to eruptions. Those insights can, in turn, illuminate some of the underlying physics. All these Caribbean volcanoes, diverse though they may be, could have a shared set of fluid dynamics equations.However, seismology won’t be enough by itself. “We lack the physical understanding of what exactly is going on in a magma chamber,” Poland says. What causes the unstoppable nucleation of bubbles within a body of magma, which can propel hot, buoyant magma through the crust above with soda can-like effervescence? What combination of molten rock, crystals, and gas is primed to trigger an eruption? What drives an eruption to switch from expelling oozing lava to blasting ash and rock into the sky?Geochemistry is essential to this effort, too. Today, scientists scoop up lava or ash, fresh or ancient, around volcanoes—both during an eruption and in the interregnum between them—to identify subtle changes in chemical makeup. Scientists use sophisticated numerical models to simulate volcanic viscera, but this is still educated guesswork. Laboratory experiments, though, may be able to ground these models.Replicating the most extreme phenomena in laboratory settings is not easy. But in successful experiments in the fall of 2025, scientists re-created the conditions present at the birth of planets, complete with simulacra of magma and miniature hydrogen atmospheres. “You can’t just make a magma chamber at the surface of the Earth,” Poland says. “But we’re a heck of a lot closer to that sort of thing than we were a while ago.”Ideally, volcanologists want to try something else truly ambitious: “Drill all the way down to where there is some magma sitting at depth, and really see these processes in situ, rather than just seeing the results of them,” Winder says. That is one of the objectives of the Krafla Magma Testbed in Iceland. This literally groundbreaking facility is set to become the world’s first direct magma observatory.“There’s no reason we can’t think that, at some point in the future, we can have volcano forecasts that are like weather forecasts,” Poland says. But deriving a unified theory of volcanism will require a geologic Manhattan Project.First, a constellation of highly diverse volcanoes will need to be slathered in geophysical instrumentation and consistently monitored over multiple eruption cycles—meaning many decades. “You would like to think, ‘OK, volcanoes are pretty well monitored.’ But they’re not,” Roman says. “There’s a handful of Cadillac volcanoes that have permanent networks.” Even many of the United States’ most dangerous volcanoes, along the Cascades in the Pacific Northwest (home to the notorious Mount St. Helens, for example, and the precarious Mount Rainier), are only partly covered in a limited number of sensors.The Soufrière Hills volcano in Montserrat buried the small town of Plymouth in 30 feet of mud and ash.
Photograph: Courtesy of Quanta Magazine/Stocktrek Images, Inc./Alamy Stock PhotoWith such a torrent of geophysical and geochemical information, scientists (aided by machine learning) can determine the commonalities that would allow them to derive foundational geophysical laws. Then they can build the archetypal volcano model: one that is very generic but can be layered onto any volcano in the world.Let’s say you’re concerned about Japan’s explosion-prone Mount Fuji. Scientists could feed its current state of seismicity, its magmatic geochemistry, and the rate at which it’s deforming into the model. Software driven by those governing equations could then virtually fast-forward the volcano toward its most probable eruption date, while also describing the likeliest eruption style and duration.Some experts suspect that there may be several volcano archetypes—ones that prefer to throw out lava, for instance, or the especially explosive kind. Either way, this eruption forecasting concept finds favor with several volcanologists. “That’s definitely the right way to be thinking about it,” says Zach Ross, a geophysicist and machine learning researcher at the California Institute of Technology.“You would like to think, ‘OK, volcanoes are pretty well monitored.’ But they’re not.”Diana Roman, Carnegie ScienceBut skepticism about accurate forecasting remains. “At the moment, I can only imagine it in exceptional circumstances,” Winder says, citing volcanoes that erupt with great frequency, like those in Hawaii or Iceland.Other people I spoke with are more sanguine, suggesting that while certain volcanoes will always be troublesome—those that erupt once every few centuries, for example, or those that seem to go from silent to violent in a matter of hours—many eruptions should be forecastable. “What we’re really missing is more data. We have not really observed that many different systems going off,” Isken says. “But I think that gap will fill over time.”Roman is part of the in-development Subduction Zones in Four Dimensions project, or SZ4D. If sufficiently funded, this international effort will carry out an intense monitoring campaign along various subduction zones—vast areas where one tectonic plate dives underneath another, including sites in Chile, Alaska, and the Cascades—to study the triggers of major landslides, earthquakes, and eruptions. She hopes that the underlying physics leading to each of these hazards will emerge.SZ4D would be a colossal scientific undertaking. But similarly mammoth endeavors were needed to understand how the weather works, and how Earth’s climate is rapidly changing. You’ve got to start somewhere. “It’s time for a big push,” Roman says.Every day, volcanologists perform scientific miracles to protect millions of people from eruptions. It’s thrilling for me to imagine a future in which people get not just hours but days or even weeks to get themselves out of harm’s way.Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.CommentsBack to topJoin the discussionCommentsBack to topTriangleYou Might Also LikeIn your inbox: Maxwell Zeff's dispatch on the business of AIWhy normal people aren’t using AI agentsBig Story: How data centers broke American politicsHackers stalked me by hijacking a cheap pink plastic watchSpecial edition: The WIRED guide to expanding your mindTopicsvolcanoesevacuationQuanta MagazineGeologyphysicsRead MoreWhat Is El Niño, and What Does It Mean for Weather, Water, and the Global Economy?This year’s El Niño is shaping up to be the strongest on record. Here’s what to expect.Ritsuko KawaiA One-Two Punch Has Atlantic Hurricane Season on the RopesEl Niño coupled with Saharan dust is making this year’s hurricane season a dud. But there’s still potential for dangerous storms.Dennis MersereauWhat the Heck? Another Perfect Geometric Shape Has Been Detected on SaturnThe discovery adds to the planet’s history of strange atmospheric phenomena that scientists don’t fully understand.Jorge GarayWe’ve Got a ‘Supersized’ El Niño on Our HandsThe World Meteorological Organization is warning that the climate phenomenon that has the Pacific running a fever will last until at least February, with dire consequences for weather worldwide.Molly TaftInside the Experimental Traps Scientists Set for Ghostly NeutrinosObservatories have been built in mines, deep under the Antarctic ice sheet, and elsewhere in an effort to detect the fleeting particles.Simon FrantzCongratulations! You Just Lived Through the Hottest Month Ever RecordedWhile the strengthening El Niño helped boost temperatures, climate change is the main culprit for making August so hot.Molly TaftHow Rising Temperatures Likely Contributed to Nepal’s Deadly FloodClimate change is causing glaciers to retreat and become less stable, upping the odds of catastrophic collapses.Molly TaftScientists Create the Littlest Big Bang to Study the Universe's OriginsThe discovery redefines how large atoms need to be to produce the extreme state of matter found in the early universe.Jorge GarayAstronomers Discover the Existence of a Black Hole StarAn object observed by the James Webb Space Telescope lends credence to a strange explanation for the mysterious red spots in the early universe.Jorge GarayThe Super El Niño Won’t Fix the West’s Water Crisis“People have talked about the Colorado River crisis for decades—we’re now in it,” says one expert. “Everyone you talk to is like, ‘Shit, man.’”Molly TaftJapan Is Launching a Probe to Collect the First-Ever Samples From a Martian MoonThe mission to Phobos, Japan’s first Mars probe launch in 28 years, may reveal new information about our closest planetary neighbor.Ritsuko KawaiScientists Have Found the Most Convincing Evidence Yet of a Dark Matter ParticleAn underground detector recorded a strange interaction pointing to a particle with some properties that signify dark matter. The detection is small but promising.Jorge GarayWIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersLivestreamsTravelFAQContact UsWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesCouponsAdvertiseManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

The prospect of predicting volcanic eruptions with the accuracy of weather forecasting hinges on a significantly deeper understanding of underground physics, although volcanologists believe this is attainable. The 1991 eruption of Pinatubo in the Philippines served as a stark example, where the initial assessment of the volcano's behavior, while timely, was an educated guess rather than a certain prediction of the explosive event and its evolution. This incident highlights the inherent difficulty in forecasting volcanism, which contrasts sharply with weather forecasting because the atmosphere is perpetually visible to meteorologists, whereas magma resides deep within the Earth’s crust.

The fundamental difference between forecasting weather and volcanism lies in the nature of the systems involved. Weather involves the atmosphere, which is constantly visible and measurable; in contrast, volcanism involves magma situated kilometers below the crust, with eruptions occurring infrequently, often only once every few decades. Furthermore, each volcano possesses unique characteristics determined by the architecture of subterranean magma pathways, the chemistry of the magma, the cadence of eruptions, and the assortment of eruption styles, which differ significantly across locations. Eruptions are not triggered by a single factor; they result from complex interactions between the temperature and pressure of the magma reservoir, the weakness of the surrounding rock, the gas and crystal content, magma depth, and regional tectonic plate motion.

Volcanologists approach this challenge by viewing eruptions as complex systems, like orchestras, where seismometers detect rock cracking from magma ascent, ground sensors and satellites track crustal shifts caused by magma flow, and gas detectors reveal magma migration to shallow depths. The core challenge is understanding how this complex "symphony" will climax, long before it begins. Currently, the best prediction offered by well-monitored volcanoes is acute caution, alerting the public to heightened unrest based on recognizing patterns in measurable geophysical signals, such as seismic activity, rather than making definitive predictions.

To move toward true prediction, scientists must seek a unified understanding of the underlying physics governing volcanic systems. This requires discovering the shared physics that influence magma reservoirs and catastrophic failure. While researchers have successfully applied physical laws, such as the Navier-Stokes equations for fluid motion and the heat equation for cooling, to predict lava flows and pyroclastic flows, a complete understanding of the processes leading to an eruption remains elusive.

Current research efforts are focused on investigating the drivers of dangerous volcanic escalations through multidisciplinary approaches, such as the project Ex-X, which focuses on volcanoes in the Eastern Caribbean. This effort aims to use monitoring of geophysical signals, including seismology and ground deformation, along with machine learning, to identify subtle changes in magma behavior that precede eruptions. The goal is to gain unprecedented detail on how minute changes in magma position and behavior lead to eruptions, hopefully illuminating the underlying physical principles.

To overcome the limitations of current monitoring, further investigation is necessary into the physics within the magma chamber itself. Geochemistry is also essential, involving the collection of erupted materials to identify chemical changes, alongside numerical modeling constrained by laboratory experiments. Future ambitions involve creating direct observations of magma processes in situ, such as the proposed Krafla Magma Testbed in Iceland, which aims to be the world’s first direct magma observatory. Ultimately, the long-term goal is to establish a unified theory of volcanism by monitoring a constellation of diverse volcanoes over many eruption cycles to derive generalized geophysical laws. Through analyzing this comprehensive data, scientists hope to develop archetypal volcano models that could, in theory, allow for sophisticated, accurate forecasts of eruption timing and style.