New $100K H-1B Visa Fee Pushes Tech Jobs Offshore - IEEE SpectrumIEEE.orgIEEE XploreIEEE StandardsIEEE Job SiteMore SitesSign InJoin IEEEU.S. Tech Firms Change Strategies to Hire International TalentShareFOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDERSearch: Explore by topicAerospaceAIBiomedicalClimate TechComputingConsumer ElectronicsEnergyHistory of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductorsTelecommunicationsTransportation
IEEE Spectrum
FOR THE TECHNOLOGY INSIDERTopicsAerospaceAIBiomedicalClimate TechComputingConsumer ElectronicsEnergyHistory of TechnologyRoboticsSemiconductorsTelecommunicationsTransportationSectionsFeaturesNewsOpinionCareersDIYEngineering ResourcesMoreNewslettersSpecial ReportsCollectionsExplainersTop Programming LanguagesRobots Guide ↗IEEE Job Site ↗For IEEE MembersCurrent IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute ArchiveFor IEEE MembersCurrent IssueMagazine ArchiveThe InstituteThe Institute ArchiveIEEE SpectrumAbout UsContact UsReprints & Permissions ↗Advertising ↗Follow IEEE SpectrumSupport IEEE SpectrumIEEE Spectrum is the flagship publication of the IEEE — the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences. Our articles, videos, and infographics inform our readers about developments in technology, engineering, and science.SubscribeAbout IEEEContact & SupportAccessibilityNondiscrimination PolicyTermsIEEE Privacy PolicyCookie PreferencesAd Privacy Options© Copyright 2026 IEEE — All rights reserved. A public charity, IEEE is the world's largest technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.
Enjoy more free content and benefits by creating an account

Saving articles to read later requires an IEEE Spectrum account

The Institute content is only available for members

Downloading full PDF issues is exclusive for IEEE Members

Downloading this e-book is exclusive for IEEE Members

Access to
Spectrum
's Digital Edition is exclusive for IEEE Members

Following topics is a feature exclusive for IEEE Members

Adding your response to an article requires an IEEE Spectrum account

Create an account to access more content and features on
IEEE Spectrum
, including the ability to save articles to read later, download Spectrum Collections, and participate in
conversations with readers and editors. For more exclusive content and features, consider
Joining IEEE
.

Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to
all of Spectrum’s articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits.
Learn more about IEEE →
Join the world’s largest professional organization devoted to engineering and applied sciences and get access to
this e-book plus all of
IEEE Spectrum’s
articles, archives, PDF downloads, and other benefits.
Learn more about IEEE →CREATE AN ACCOUNTSIGN INJOIN IEEESIGN INCloseAccess Thousands of Articles — Completely Free
Create an account and get exclusive content and features:
Save articles, download collections,
and
post comments
— all free! For full access and benefits,

subscribe

to Spectrum.
CREATE AN ACCOUNTSIGN INCareersNews
U.S. Tech Firms Change Strategies to Hire International Talent
Shifting rules around H-1B visas have companies building and hiring elsewhereLucas Laursen12 Sep 20265 min readLucas Laursen is the technology policy editor at IEEE Spectrum.
iStock
Over the last 21 months, the U.S. federal government has created a series of high-profile barriers to legal immigration by highly-skilled students and workers: Cancelling visa extensions, cutting interview opportunities, and attempting to charge US $100,000 or more for certain immigrant visas. “Whether they go into effect or not, it’s really an unrelenting barrage of government-sponsored propaganda against highly-skilled workers in the U.S.,” says former congressional immigration policy advisor David Bier, now an immigration scholar at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. The effect is that U.S. tech companies are adapting their search for top talent in part by both building offices and hiring workers abroad to get around the onslaught of new rules. And they’re doing so without wanting to talk about it: IEEE Spectrum contacted 25 U.S. tech companies to learn how they were adapting to the shifting environment. All of them either did not respond to a request to comment or declined to participate in this story.New H-1B Rules Create Uncertainty, Impose CostsBy July 2025, the new U.S. presidential administration tightened visa interview requirements and imposed social media checks on new visa holders, and international students were already showing less interest in studying in the U.S., which IEEE Spectrum reported at the time.Then, in September 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump proclaimed a $100,000 tax on applications for new H-1B visas, up from around $5,000. H-1B visas allow certain skilled workers to temporarily live and work in the U.S. and serve as a common bridge to permanent residency. One category, for workers at universities, hospitals, and other non-profit institutions, is uncapped, but for-profit companies together can only hire up to 85,000 H-1B workers a year across the U.S., assigned through an annual lottery.Tech giants including Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Walmart advised some of their visa-holding employees not to travel abroad for fear of having trouble re-entering the country. They also lobbied the federal government, which narrowed the proclamation to applications from outside the U.S. Most applications for H-1B visas are by companies trying to hire foreign workers already in the U.S. with a different legal status.In fact, most companies that might have hired H-1B workers decided against applying for visas for candidates subject to the $100,000 tax, a March court filing revealed. DHS recorded collecting fees for only 85 qualifying H-1B applications between the presidential proclamation in September 2025 and 15 February 2026. The department also reported processing 87 percent fewer applications for the H-1B visas subject to the tax than the year before. The government ended up earning $20 million less than the previous year on H-1Bs, because so few companies were willing to pay the new price for hiring H-1B workers from abroad.“Some of those jobs might just be relocated abroad or maybe companies will make more efforts to recruit U.S. workers,” says sociologist Julia Gelatt, an immigration demography scholar at the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C. “Some immigrant workers may have found a different pathway, like the L visa for transfers inside multinational companies or the highly-skilled may have been able to get O visas for extraordinary ability.”“Whether they go into effect or not, it’s really an unrelenting barrage of government-sponsored propaganda against highly-skilled workers in the U.S.” —David Bier, Cato InstituteThe U.S. government also continued targeting foreign students. In July, it set a fixed 4-year time limit on student visas. In the past, those visas lasted as long as the student’s course of study. The federal government is also studying a proposal to charge students on such visas between $70,000 and $100,000 to stay for 1 to 3 years after graduation—something that they can currently do for free. “If there is a $100,000 fee for that, it’s going to cut the talent pipeline,” Gelatt says.A non-peer-reviewed discussion paper by economist Michael Clemens of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore estimates that the proposal to put time limits on student visas could cost U.S. universities between hundreds of millions and several billion dollars a year. That’s without getting into the longer-term cost to the wider economy: Many foreign students who remain in the U.S. eventually apply for H-1B visas. “For many talented individuals the H-1B is the only way to stay after studying here and eventually getting a green card,” Gelatt says.For a few weeks earlier this year, things were looking better for H-1B applicants: In July, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (covering Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and Rhode Island) upheld a lower court ruling that the September 2025 H-1B tax was illegal, removing that particular barrier. But a few weeks later, on 25 August, the administration responded with a proposed rule that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) charge $103,265 for the 85,000 H-1B visas it issues annually to for-profit companies. If it goes into effect, the rule would apply to a far larger number of people than the overturned 2025 proclamation, because even applicants already in the country would need to pay.“This is a pivot to find another way to enact a policy that was ruled illegal in federal court,” says Clemens.The proposed rule is open for public comments through 24 September, and DHS must address those comments before issuing a final rule. Plenty of commenters welcome any barrier to the H-1B program, which they blame for taking jobs from U.S. workers, despite a consensus among economists that foreign skilled workers in the U.S. enable their American colleagues to patent more and earn more.Other commenters point out flaws in the rule’s legality. As one commenter puts it: “It exceeds DHS’s statutory authority, functions as an unlegislated tax that bypasses Congress, rests on an unsupported revenue projection, and will drive high-skilled talent out of the United States.”Companies Seek H-1B WorkaroundsWhile few U.S. tech companies have issued public pronouncements on U.S. immigration policy, their staff are talking about it at a pragmatic level: for instance, the Society for Human Resource Management organized a webinar on navigating H-1B policy soon after the 2025 presidential proclamation. The society recommended employers plan for longer hiring timelines, especially from countries such as China, India, and the Philippines, from which many immigrants are hired. It also notes that companies may want to focus on retention of existing talent by helping them switch from temporary visas to permanent residency.Changes to immigration policy are also reshaping the flow of future workers. As of March, U.S. universities were reporting 20 percent fewer international enrollments in bachelor’s programs than the year before, according to Studyportals, an international student placement advisory. It was worse for master’s degrees: a 24 percent annual decline. 84 percent of the participating universities listed government policy as a significant obstacle to enrollment. Many U.S. tech companies currently hire foreign students to work summer internships or part-time while still on their student visas, or in the immediate years after they graduate. Experts say the existing program is good for both workers and companies. “Companies don’t want to have to learn how to recruit their talent from abroad, they want to hire the young smart worker who’s right in front of them,” Gelatt says. Companies also do not appear eager to provoke the federal authorities on whom they depend for visas. Of the 25 U.S. companies IEEE Spectrum contacted, 20 are among the top 100 users of H-1B visas for comment. Only two replied. They both declined to participate in this story.In unpublished, preliminary research, Clemens says, he and other economists have found clues in online job sites that fewer high-skill Indian tech workers are moving to the U.S. than in the past. “People around the world have very clearly gotten the message,” Clemens says. From Your Site ArticlesThe STEM Crisis Is a Myth ›How an Immigration Raid Complicated the U.S.’s Push for EV Manufacturing ›Related Articles Around the WebH-1B Program | U.S. Department of Labor ›H-1B Specialty Occupations | USCIS ›trump administrationunited statesh-1bimmigrationLucas LaursenLucas Laursen is the technology policy editor at IEEE Spectrum. He covers how emerging technologies are changing the balance of power between companies, governments, and individuals. The rest of the time, he worries about his own balance on a bicycle, skis, or the side of a mountain.The Conversation (3)AKEEM AMUSAT13 Sep, 2026
INDV
It is crazy what the US government is doing. I personally have lost the interest to do any graduate study in the US. It is very discouraging 1
Reply

Hide replies
AKEEM AMUSAT13 Sep, 2026
INDV
The current administration policy is very discouraging. Show More RepliesAnjan Saha13 Sep, 2026
M
H1B Visa for Brain or the Brawl. Definitely US need Neuro Smart guys with sharp shooting brain to control AI with Agentic Library and designing Algorithm without much coding assistant. Despite AI Robot ,US needs physically abled man to work in height & Deep Sea for laying pipelines and high altitude Towering Structure for supervision ,testing and Inspection. A good Carpenter, Weilder, Technician,Masonand hard working labourer with physical strength and ordinary common sense intelligence is far better than verbose ellocutor .H1B Visa should be for man with substance rather than meaning less frothy lectures and interpersonal talking skill.0
Replies

Hide replies
Show More RepliesSemiconductorsAINewsComputing
How OpenAI Used Its Own LLMs to Design Its Jalapeño Chip
43m6 min readRoboticsSponsored Article
Protecting Dynamic Industrial Robot Cable Carriers
03 Sep 20263 min readTransportationMagazineFeature
Rivian’s Gambit for Full Autonomy
08 Sep 202613 min read
Related Stories
SemiconductorsNews
The U.S. Is Building CHIPS Act Fabs but Neglecting R&D
ComputingNews
The Trump Administration Doubles Down on Quantum
History of TechnologyOpinion
How America Engineered Its Independence

The shifts in U.S. immigration policies, particularly concerning H-1B visas, are prompting technology firms to alter their strategies for acquiring top talent, often by seeking opportunities abroad. Over the past twenty-one months, the U.S. federal government has implemented various measures, including curtailing visa extensions, reducing interview opportunities, and attempting to levy substantial fees on immigrant visas, which some observers view as a sustained effort against highly-skilled workers. This environment has led some technology companies, such as Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Walmart, to advise some of their H-1B visa holders against relocating abroad due to potential reentry complications, leading them to build offices and hire employees internationally to circumvent the new regulations.

The specific changes involved a significant action in September 2025 when President Donald Trump announced a tax of $100,000 on applications for new H-1B visas, an increase from the previous amount of approximately $5,000. While the category for workers at universities, hospitals, and non-profit institutions remains uncapped, for-profit companies are limited to hiring up to 85,000 H-1B workers annually through a lottery system. This development created uncertainty among potential applicants. Despite these changes, the data recorded by the Department of Homeland Security showed that the federal government collected fees for only 85 qualifying H-1B applications between September 2025 and February 2026, and the department processed 87 percent fewer applications for these visas than in the preceding year, resulting in a net loss of $20 million in revenue for the H-1B program.

Sociologists and economists suggest that these policies represent a form of government-sponsored pressure against highly-skilled workers. Julia Gelatt, a sociologist at the Migration Policy Institute, posits that imposing a $100,000 fee on student visas, a measure currently free, would significantly deplete the talent pipeline. Research by Michael Clemens estimated that time limits on student visas could impose costs between hundreds of millions and several billion dollars annually on U.S. universities, a cost that is compounded when considering the long-term economic impact on the wider economy. Furthermore, many foreign students who remain in the U.S. ultimately pursue H-1B visas as the primary route to permanent residency.

The legal status of the H-1B tax has been contested; a lower court ruling in July 2025 had found the September 2025 tax illegal. Subsequently, the administration proposed a rule requiring the Department of Homeland Security to charge $103,265 for annual H-1B visas for for-profit companies, which would apply to even applicants already in the country. Critics of this proposed rule argue that it exceeds the Department of Homeland Security’s statutory authority, functions as an unlegislated tax that bypasses congressional authority, and ultimately risks driving high-skilled talent out of the United States. Commenters have expressed concern that such measures undermine the consensus among economists that foreign skilled workers enable American colleagues to achieve greater patents and higher earnings.

In response to these regulatory pressures, technology companies have adopted pragmatic strategies. The Society for Human Resource Management recommended that employers plan for longer hiring timelines, especially from countries like China, India, and the Philippines, and focus on retaining existing talent by facilitating transitions from temporary visas to permanent residency. There is also a broader trend affecting student enrollment, with U.S. universities reporting declining international bachelor’s and master’s program enrollments, with many attributing this decline to government policy obstacles. Despite these challenges, experts maintain that the existing programs benefit both workers and companies, noting that companies prioritize hiring talent already available domestically over attempting to recruit from abroad. Preliminary research also suggests that job site data indicate fewer high-skill Indian tech workers are moving to the U.S. than in the past, suggesting that global awareness of these policy shifts is influencing talent migration.