New evidence for hidden chambers beyond Tutankhamun's tomb
Recorded: Sept. 19, 2026, 5:09 p.m.
| Original | Summarized |
Exclusive: New evidence for hidden chambers beyond Tutankhamun’s tomb | Nature Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain Advertisement View all journals Saved research Search Log in Content About the journal Publish with us Subscribe Sign up for alerts RSS feed nature news article NEWS 17 September 2026 Exclusive: New evidence for hidden chambers beyond Tutankhamun’s tomb Geophysical survey yields ‘tantalizing’ data that could point to Nefertiti’s burial place — but it’s too early to draw definitive conclusions. By Jo Marchant0 Jo Marchant Jo Marchant is a science journalist and host of the creative-thinking podcast Where the Wild Thoughts Are. View author publications Search author on: Bluesky X Save article View saved research Ancient Egyptian queen Nefertiti, thought to have ruled as Pharaoh, might be buried near Tutankhamun. Credit: Filo/GettyTutankhamun’s tomb in Egypt’s Valley of the Kings has long puzzled archaeologists. Might hidden chambers — suspected to hold the remains of Nefertiti — lie beyond its walls? Now, researchers say they have found new evidence pointing to this controversial conclusion. The decision of whether to peek into the supposed chambers, a few metres from the existing tomb, is in the hands of Egypt’s Supreme Council of Antiquities. If approved, careful drilling to deploy miniature tractors equipped with cameras could start in November, co-author of the study George Ballard told Nature.The researchers conducted a range of geophysical surveys, including the first use of gravitational techniques to probe the density of ground around the site, as well as ground-penetrating radar (GPR) from inside the tomb. Taken together with studies of the tomb structure, the ground around it and wall paintings, the data strongly suggest that there is a “hidden complex” of corridors and rooms that pre-dates the entombment of Tutankhamun, says lead researcher Mamdouh Eldamaty, an archaeologist at Ain Shams University in Cairo and former antiquities minister of the Egyptian government. Is this Nefertiti’s tomb? Radar clues reignite debate over hidden chambersIf confirmed, this could “rank among the most transformative archaeological discoveries of the modern era”, he adds. The team’s conclusions were published online on 17 September in the Occasional Papers of the Amarna Royal Tombs Project1.Teasing out dataThe study is the latest in a string of attempts to picture what lies behind the walls of the tomb, known as KV62, since co-author Nicholas Reeves, an independent British Egyptologist who has worked extensively in the Valley of the Kings, suggested in 2015 that it could be hiding the resting place of Tutankhamun’s predecessor, Nefertiti. Many Egyptologists think she briefly ruled as a Pharaoh.The tomb, which was built in the fourteenth century bc and discovered in 1922, is perplexing because it is unexpectedly small for a royal burial. On the basis of lines and cracks in the north wall of the burial chamber, as well as ancient alterations to the room’s paintings, Reeves suggested that the structure was a false wall, of a type often used by ancient Egyptian tomb builders to hide further chambers2.Reeves proposed that KV62 was originally a much larger royal tomb: when young Tutankhamun died unexpectedly, the entranceway was enlarged and modified for his burial, and the deeper sections were blocked off. But geophysical analyses aiming to test his theory have so far yielded mixed results. Some researchers concluded that chambers were indeed present; others found that the data revealed nothing.Now, Eldamaty and his colleagues at Egypt’s National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics have once more used GPR to probe the interior walls of the tomb. Ballard, a structural engineer and president of the GBG Group, an international geophysics consultancy, analysed the results, as well as all available data from the previous surveys. Ballard is confident that they show a 2-metre-wide corridor, densely packed with rubble, leading away from the burial chamber. He argues that previous teams missed it because they were looking instead for a large void immediately behind the wall.GPR, conducted through the walls from inside the tomb, has a limited range, so the team also turned to a microgravity survey — a non-invasive technique that measures density through tiny variations in Earth’s gravitational field — to investigate the area over and around the tomb. Ballard says that the data, from more than 1,200 readings across a 35-square-metre area, show what could be artificial chambers: “structures with right angles, of low density — and those structures are interestingly parallel on their axes to the north wall”. Data collected in 20173 by electrical-resistivity tomography, a technique that maps sub-surface structures, show anomalies in similar locations, although these were dismissed at the time as not being related to KV62.Ballard highlights one feature, ‘anomaly 7’, as particularly intriguing: a mostly low-density zone hosting a roughly square, high-density area within it. This feature might be a chamber filled with objects, he suggests — although he admits that he is “looking at the very limits of detection”. The proposed chambers do not seem to link to any other entrances, suggesting that — if they exist — they have not been entered since ancient times. A further possible room lies immediately to the west of the burial chamber, although Ballard says the signal here is complicated by the gravitational effect of another tomb that lies nearby.Other geophysicists are intrigued but cautious. Christopher Gaffney, an archaeologist and GPR specialist at the University of Bradford, UK, describes the report as “fascinating” but says that it doesn’t provide enough information to draw definitive conclusions. “I’m feeling pretty ambivalent,” he says.From the microgravity data, the presence of chambers “looks plausible”, says Peter Styles, a geophysicist at Keele University, UK. But he, too, would like to see more details. Ballard says he doesn’t yet have permission from the Egyptian authorities to release all of the data.Egyptologists rejoice Enjoying our latest content? Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team Access through your institution or Sign in or create an account Continue with Google Continue with ORCiD doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-02621-2 ReferencesEldamaty, M., Abbas, A. M., Ballard, G. & Reeves, N. Occasional Papers of the Amarna Royal Tombs Project No. 8 (2026).Reeves, N. Occasional Papers of the Amarna Royal Tombs Project No. 1 (2015).Fischanger, F. et al. J. Cult. Herit. 36, 63–71 (2019).Article Reprints and permissions Related Articles Subjects Archaeology History Geophysics Latest on: Archaeology History Geophysics Ruins of ancient Asian city show engineering prowess and organization Denisovans from southwestern China and their subsistence strategies Ancient proteins identify various Denisovan remains from Southwest China The geometric genius of René Descartes The Kelvin scale’s creator William Thomson made many scientific advances ‘Mother of Hubble’: how Nancy Grace Roman ushered in a new era of astronomy The leap second is dead. Long live the leap hour? Tidal tomography reveals a thermal anomaly beneath Mars’s crustal dichotomy Earth-shaking thunder probes underground geology Jobs Talent Recruitment Announcement at the College of Plant Science & Technology Gather Global Talents, Forge Great Achievements Recruitment Announcement for High-Level Talent at the Center for Agricultural Microbiology Join HZAU's global faculty team to advance research with competitive benefits. Faculty Search, Vanderbilt University Nashville, Tennessee Tenure-Track: Assistant Professor in Marine Biology Assistant Professor - Marine Biology; dynamic marine biologist whose research advances understanding of marine organisms, habitats, & ecosystems Associate or Senior Editor, Nature Communications (Polymer Materials) Title: Associate or Senior Editor, Nature Communications (Polymer Materials) Locations: Shanghai, Beijing, Nanjing, New Delhi or Pune (Hybrid) Appl... Related Articles Subjects Archaeology History Geophysics Sign up to Nature Briefing Email address Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Sign up Explore content Research articles News Opinion Research Analysis Careers Books & Culture Podcasts Videos Current issue Browse issues Collections Subjects Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Bluesky Follow us on X Subscribe Sign up for alerts RSS feed About the journal Journal Staff About the Editors Research Cross-Journal Editorial Team Journal Information Journal Metrics Our publishing models Editorial Values Statement Editorial policies Journalistic Principles History of Nature Awards Contact Send a news tip Publish with us For Authors For Referees Language editing services Open access funding Submit manuscript Search Search articles by subject, keyword or author Show results from All journals Search Advanced search Quick links Explore articles by subject Nature ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print) nature.com footer links About Nature Portfolio About us Discover content Journals A-Z Publishing policies Nature portfolio policies Author & Researcher services Reprints & permissions Libraries & institutions Librarian service & tools Advertising & partnerships Advertising Branded Professional development Nature Awards Regional websites Nature Africa Privacy Your privacy choices/Manage cookies Legal © 2026 Springer Nature Limited Close banner Close Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address Sign up I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close banner Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. |
Geophysical surveys conducted around Tutankhamun’s tomb in the Valley of the Kings have provided new evidence suggesting the existence of hidden chambers beyond the existing structure, which could pertain to the burial place of Nefertiti. Researchers have utilized a range of techniques, including the first application of gravitational methods to measure ground density and ground-penetrating radar (GPR) from within the tomb, alongside structural studies of the tomb and its surrounding features. Lead researcher Mamdouh Eldamaty concluded that this data strongly suggests a "hidden complex" of corridors and rooms that predate Tutankhamun’s entombment, raising the possibility that these chambers might be Nefertiti’s burial site. This investigation builds upon earlier speculation, such as that proposed by Nicholas Reeves in 2015, who suggested that the tomb might conceal the resting place of Tutankhamun’s predecessor, Nefertiti, based on indications that the structure incorporated false walls common in ancient Egyptian tomb construction to conceal additional chambers. While previous tests of this theory yielded mixed results, the most recent analysis by Eldamaty and colleagues, who collaborated with structural engineer George Ballard, points toward significant subterranean structures. Ballard analyzed the GPR results and other data, confidently indicating the presence of a two-meter-wide corridor densely packed with rubble leading away from the burial chamber. The team also employed a microgravity survey, a non-invasive technique measuring subtle variations in Earth’s gravitational field, to investigate the area surrounding the tomb. The data from this survey indicated structures with right angles and low density, which are interestingly parallel to the north wall. Furthermore, electrical-resistivity tomography data gathered in 2017 revealed anomalies in similar locations, although these were initially dismissed as unrelated to the tomb. One particularly intriguing feature highlighted by Ballard is ‘anomaly 7’, which is characterized by a mostly low-density zone containing a roughly square, high-density area, which he suggests could represent a chamber filled with objects. Although some geophysicists, such as Christopher Gaffney, have found the report fascinating, they remain cautious, noting that the current information does not allow for definitive conclusions. Peter Styles also expressed interest based on the microgravity data, but emphasized the need for further detailed information. Although Ballard notes he does not yet have permission from Egyptian authorities to release all the data, the findings offer compelling geological and archaeological clues regarding the complex architecture of the tomb area. |