LmCast :: Stay tuned in

Meet the Academics Trying to Stop You From Having Sex in Robotaxis

Recorded: Sept. 20, 2026, 10:08 a.m.

Original Summarized

Meet the Academics Trying to Stop You From Having Sex in Robotaxis | WIREDSkip to main contentTHE WIRED APP IS HEREDOWNLOAD NOW »MenuWIREDSECURITYPOLITICSTHE BIG STORYBUSINESSSCIENCECULTUREREVIEWSMenuWIREDAccountAccountNewslettersBest Android PhonesBest Robot VacuumsBest 2-in-1 LaptopsBest SoundbarsDeals DeliveredSecurityPoliticsThe Big StoryBusinessScienceCultureReviewsChevronMoreExpandThe Big InterviewMagazineEventsWIRED InsiderWIRED ConsultingNewslettersPodcastsVideoLivestreamsWIRED StoreSearchSearchAarian MarshallGearSep 20, 2026 6:00 AMMeet the Academics Trying to Stop You From Having Sex in Robotaxis“You know ‘Bang Bus’? We don’t want that.”Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff; Getty ImagesCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyCommentLoaderSave StorySave this storyPavlo Bazilinskyy still can’t believe he was on PornHub for work. He’s an assistant professor at the Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands, and has spent more than a decade researching AI-driven interactions between humans and robots. But he found himself typing “public transport” into the search bar of a very specific website’s “amateur section.” 297 hits.“People are hard to predict,” Bazilinskyy says. It’s why he researches what he does. So his prurient pursuit had a point. Robotaxis without cabbies behind the wheel have started picking up passengers in a handful of countries, including the US. Meanwhile, there’s a long history of people getting up to antisocial behavior inside the quasi-private or straight-up public spaces of trains, planes, and automobiles—think the prom night limo, the “Mile High Club,” Tom Cruise in slow motion aboard the Chicago L in Risky Business, the stuff he found on PornHub.What might riders do when there’s no authority figure inside a vehicle to say, “Hey, stop that!”? What do they do? Can people be convinced to stop before they start?This week, Bazilinskyy and academic colleagues with backgrounds in systems engineering, computer science, psychology, and tourism studies are hosting an industry workshop asking participants to brainstorm along those very lines: How do you stop people from doing it in self-driving cars? Thinking about sex in autonomous vehicles, they theorize, can let anyone who cares about the future of mobility “stress-test” the role the vehicles might eventually play as communal spaces, where social norms get acted out every day.The event focuses on prevention not just because these academics are no fun (though Alexandros Rouchitsas, an engineering psychologist who is also hosting the event, admits they are “taking the side of the parents, the elderly—we are not the cool people here”). They don’t want people to have sex in self-driving cars because they’re worried it will give a potentially positive technology a really bad rep.“We want to see automated mobility solutions accepted, trusted by the general public,” Rouchitsas says. Self-driving could have huge upsides for the elderly, children, and people with disabilities, who have a harder time getting around places where driving is quicker and sometimes necessary. The tech might eventually move beyond private taxis and into public transit, where all sorts of people should be able to travel safely and comfortably. “We want automated mobility solutions to be seen as something that is equitable, serious, societally minded,” he says.Rouchitsas’ biggest fear is that self-driving gets co-opted by the partiers, the drug users, the sort of hedonistic folk who have descended on some islands of his native Greece. “You know ‘Bang Bus’?” he says. “We don’t want that.”The four-hour workshop—rise and shine, it starts at 8:30 am—is part of an industry conference in Gothenburg, Sweden, focusing on how people interact with vehicles and larger mobility systems. The organizers expect participants from academia but also the wider industry. (Gothenburg is home to Volvo Cars and the tech supplier SmartEye; BMW and Google are conference sponsors.) Those who show up will be prompted to come up with physical and design interventions that encourage people to not do that. The workshop will focus on preventing consensual interactions, its organizers say.Rouchitsas, who studies human-machine interactions, says he hopes participants will get creative with their anti-action designs. But just off the top of his head: Maybe the vehicles could be transparent? Maybe a light begins to blink if the technology senses behavior it disapproves of? The organizers intend to publish a paper based on the workshop’s results.Sex is the fun, eye-catching part here, made all the more alluring because it’s “the elephant in the room” for those thinking about how humans might interact with machines in the future, says Bazilinskyy—very under-studied. But the results of this sort of inquiry could help designers, companies, and lawmakers figure out how to compel people to safely share communal spaces like public self-driving buses in the future.Prevent sex and maybe you’ll also prevent robbery, bullying, and homicide. “It could be helpful for the industry and academics to use this example to design other things,” he says.CommentsBack to topJoin the discussionCommentsBack to topTriangleYou Might Also LikeIn your inbox: WIRED's most ambitious, future-defining storiesAI slop backlash is actually having an impactBig Story: The cop who took on FlockThe rise of the 1am job interviewWatch: I stole a car by hacking this hidden deviceAarian Marshall is a staff writer covering transportation systems and cities. Before joining WIRED, she wrote for The Atlantic’s CityLab. Marshall is based in San Diego and is developing opinions about tacos. ... Read MoreStaff WriterXTopicsrobotaxissexSelf-Driving Carsdriverless carsAutonomous CarsTeslaWaymopublic transportationtransportationRead MoreSelf-Driving Cars Might Change Crash Testing ForeverLie down in a car, and you’re more likely to get seriously hurt in a crash. But a driverless future is forcing governments to revisit long-standing safety issues.Aarian MarshallThe EU Wants to Break Up Kids and Their ChatbotsChatGPT, Character.ai, and Snapchat’s My AI will all be in the crosshairs as the EU Kids Act aims to strip minor-facing chatbots of all the things that make people love them.Isabella WardTesla’s Make-or-Break Cybercab Had a Quiet DebutAn invite-only event in Austin, Texas, kept online fans in the dark for hours.Aarian MarshallThe Cybercab Is Almost Here. Now Comes the Hard PartThe electric-auto maker will officially debut its steering-wheel-free robotaxi on Thursday. But building the vehicle is the easy part.Aarian Marshall‘I Felt Super Violated’: Men Wearing Meta Glasses on Dates Is an Instant Red FlagAs anxieties over surveillance tech grow, unsuspecting singles are sharing stories of being covertly filmed on dates by Meta smart glasses.Jason ParhamLyft Sees a Future for Its Drivers in a Driverless World: Servicing WaymosA team-up with Waymo in Nashville has former Lyft drivers maintaining self-driving cars. What’s next?Aarian MarshallAI Agents Are Thirsty for PowerSilicon Valley is shifting away from chatbot queries toward a future filled with resource-intensive agentic AI—and it's driving the data center buildout.Molly TaftWhy AI Isn’t Likely to Wipe Out Humanity With BioweaponsOf all the threats presented by uncontrollable artificial intelligence, scientists say death by plague ranks low.Kate KnibbsIf the AI Industry Followed Its Own Research, It Might Have Paused AlreadyAnthropic’s CEO says that safety hinges on understanding how AI “thinks.” So far the evidence is disturbing.Steven LevyThe AI Researcher Who Just Quit Anthropic Says It’s ‘Crunch Time for Humanity’Jacob Coxon talks to WIRED about the “mini Manhattan project” inside Anthropic, the problem with alignment, and why AI labs have just a few years left to make their systems safe.Maxwell ZeffA Teen Girl’s Death Is Prompting Calls to Ban Choking in PornDespite the many health risks, sexual strangulation has become popular among young people—with some experts blaming adult content for normalizing it.Kat TenbargeWho Cares if AI Is Conscious—It’s Basically AliveWhile philosophers ponder AI consciousness, the models have ideas of their own.Steven LevyWired CouponsCode promo Canon10% Off Canon Promo Code + Up to 30% OffVeriizon Promo CodeBest Verizon Smartphone DealsAT&T Promo CodeAT&T Top Deals: Wireless, Internet, Bundles and More!VistaPrint promo codeTake Up to 25% Off Custom Prints with VistaPrint Promo CodePeacock Promo CodeSave With a Peacock Promo Code: 3 Months FreeSquarespace Promo CodeSquarespace Promo Code: 50% OffWIRED is obsessed with what comes next. Through rigorous investigations and game-changing reporting, we tell stories that don’t just reflect the moment—they help create it. When you look back in 10, 20, even 50 years, WIRED will be the publication that led the story of the present, mapped the people, products, and ideas defining it, and explained how those forces forged the future. WIRED: For Future Reference.More From WIREDSubscribeNewslettersDownload the WIRED AppLivestreamsTravelFAQContact UsWIRED StaffWIRED EducationEditorial StandardsArchiveRSSSite MapAccessibility HelpReviews and GuidesReviewsBuying GuidesStreaming GuidesCouponsAdvertiseManage AccountJobsPress CenterCondé Nast StoreUser AgreementPrivacy PolicyYour California Privacy Rights© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesSelect international siteUnited StatesLargeChevronItaliaJapónCzech Republic & SlovakiaFacebookXPinterestYouTubeInstagramTiktok

Academics specializing in human-robot interactions are investigating methods to prevent undesirable behavior, specifically sexual misconduct, within the context of autonomous robotaxis. This research stems from the observation that in environments like public transportation, where there is no direct authority figure to intervene, antisocial behavior has historically occurred. Pavlo Bazilinskyy and his colleagues, who have spent over a decade researching human-robot interactions, explored this issue by examining the searches related to public transport, noting that people are difficult to predict.

The core objective of the research, which involves academics from fields such as systems engineering, computer science, psychology, and tourism studies, is to brainstorm how to prevent such behavior in self-driving cars. They theorize that analyzing sexual interactions within autonomous vehicles can serve as a stress test for how these technologies might eventually function as communal spaces where social norms are enacted daily.

The motivation behind this focus on prevention is rooted in concerns about public acceptance and the potential societal role of automated mobility solutions. Alexandros Rouchitsas, an engineering psychologist who co-hosted the event, emphasized that the goal is to ensure that automated mobility solutions are accepted and trusted by the public. He expressed a major fear that self-driving technology could be co-opted by hedonistic groups, citing concerns about a type of behavior referenced by the term “Bang Bus.” Rouchitsas believes that the technology should be viewed as equitable and societally minded, offering significant benefits to vulnerable populations, including the elderly, children, and people with disabilities, by providing safer and more convenient travel options.

A four-hour industry workshop was organized to facilitate this discussion, inviting academics and industry participants interested in how people interact with vehicles and larger mobility systems. Participants were tasked with developing physical and design interventions aimed at discouraging certain actions. Potential solutions discussed included novel design features, such as transparent vehicles or systems that provide sensory feedback based on disapproving behaviors. The organizers intend to publish findings from this workshop.

Bazilinskyy suggests that while the sexual aspect is the most attention-grabbing element, the inquiry is broader. He posits that understanding this dynamic could aid designers, companies, and lawmakers in developing methods to compel safe behavior in future communal settings, suggesting that controlling these interactions could also offer preventative measures against other crimes such as robbery, bullying, and homicide. Ultimately, the inquiry aims to leverage this examination of human-machine interaction to shape the design of safer and more socially responsible autonomous mobility systems.